Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death

Aim: This study aimed to present 96 cases evaluated by the 1st Specialization Committee of The Council of Forensic Medicine, which included medical malpractice claims about urologists resulting in death between 2010 and 2015 and to increase the awareness of urologists about medical malpractice claim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İbrahim Üzün, Bilgin Hösükler, Erdem Hösükler, Buğra Kaan Yazgı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rabia Yılmaz 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2122935
_version_ 1827980154653114368
author İbrahim Üzün
Bilgin Hösükler
Erdem Hösükler
Buğra Kaan Yazgı
author_facet İbrahim Üzün
Bilgin Hösükler
Erdem Hösükler
Buğra Kaan Yazgı
author_sort İbrahim Üzün
collection DOAJ
description Aim: This study aimed to present 96 cases evaluated by the 1st Specialization Committee of The Council of Forensic Medicine, which included medical malpractice claims about urologists resulting in death between 2010 and 2015 and to increase the awareness of urologists about medical malpractice claims. Materials and methods: The reports prepared by the 1st Specialization Committee of The Council of Forensic Medicine between 2010–2015 were reviewed retrospectively. All of the cases treated in Urology clinics, alleged medical malpractice, and resulted in death, participated in the study. Results: In this study, 96 cases were included. It was reported that there was medical malpractice in 16 (16.7%) cases. Seventy–six of the patients (79.2%) were female; the most common age range was ≥ 60 years (n:46 47.9%); the mean age was 54,90±19,59 years. Seventy–three (76%) cases were followed up under elective conditions. Complications developed in 20 (20.8%) of the cases during their treatment course. Surgical treatment was applied in 68 (70.8%) patients. Twenty (20.8%) cases were diagnosed with urinary system stone disease and 16 (16.7%) cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The committee attributed malpractice to the doctors most frequently due to lack of treatment (n:6, 37.5%). Conclusion: We think that a comprehensive review of the cases with medical malpractice claims will contribute to a better understanding of these cases, the improvement of the medical service provided, and public health.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:49:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5c8999ae3b44b68ae5cd7e0c73c54fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-7180
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:49:11Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Rabia Yılmaz
record_format Article
series Journal of Contemporary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c5c8999ae3b44b68ae5cd7e0c73c54fb2023-03-24T19:43:26ZengRabia YılmazJournal of Contemporary Medicine2667-71802022-05-0112343143610.16899/jcm.10344111809Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Deathİbrahim Üzün0Bilgin Hösükler1Erdem Hösükler2Buğra Kaan Yazgı3ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, CERRAHPAŞA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC MEDICINEUSAK UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC MEDICINEABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC MEDICINEABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC MEDICINEAim: This study aimed to present 96 cases evaluated by the 1st Specialization Committee of The Council of Forensic Medicine, which included medical malpractice claims about urologists resulting in death between 2010 and 2015 and to increase the awareness of urologists about medical malpractice claims. Materials and methods: The reports prepared by the 1st Specialization Committee of The Council of Forensic Medicine between 2010–2015 were reviewed retrospectively. All of the cases treated in Urology clinics, alleged medical malpractice, and resulted in death, participated in the study. Results: In this study, 96 cases were included. It was reported that there was medical malpractice in 16 (16.7%) cases. Seventy–six of the patients (79.2%) were female; the most common age range was ≥ 60 years (n:46 47.9%); the mean age was 54,90±19,59 years. Seventy–three (76%) cases were followed up under elective conditions. Complications developed in 20 (20.8%) of the cases during their treatment course. Surgical treatment was applied in 68 (70.8%) patients. Twenty (20.8%) cases were diagnosed with urinary system stone disease and 16 (16.7%) cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The committee attributed malpractice to the doctors most frequently due to lack of treatment (n:6, 37.5%). Conclusion: We think that a comprehensive review of the cases with medical malpractice claims will contribute to a better understanding of these cases, the improvement of the medical service provided, and public health.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2122935medical malprtacticeurologyforensic medicinetıbbi uygulama hatasıürolojiadli tıp
spellingShingle İbrahim Üzün
Bilgin Hösükler
Erdem Hösükler
Buğra Kaan Yazgı
Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
medical malprtactice
urology
forensic medicine
tıbbi uygulama hatası
üroloji
adli tıp
title Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
title_full Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
title_fullStr Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
title_short Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Urology Cases Resulting in Death
title_sort evaluation of medical malpractice in urology cases resulting in death
topic medical malprtactice
urology
forensic medicine
tıbbi uygulama hatası
üroloji
adli tıp
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2122935
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimuzun evaluationofmedicalmalpracticeinurologycasesresultingindeath
AT bilginhosukler evaluationofmedicalmalpracticeinurologycasesresultingindeath
AT erdemhosukler evaluationofmedicalmalpracticeinurologycasesresultingindeath
AT bugrakaanyazgı evaluationofmedicalmalpracticeinurologycasesresultingindeath