Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness.
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
NIHR Journals Library
2000-01-01
|
| Series: | Health Technology Assessment |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070 |
| _version_ | 1819327202766880768 |
|---|---|
| author | French Cowan Mansour Morris Procter Hughes Robinson Guillebaud |
| author_facet | French Cowan Mansour Morris Procter Hughes Robinson Guillebaud |
| author_sort | French |
| collection | DOAJ |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T13:07:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c5c9d3bdc2bc4a02bc46eb5fb0115333 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1366-5278 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T13:07:06Z |
| publishDate | 2000-01-01 |
| publisher | NIHR Journals Library |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Health Technology Assessment |
| spelling | doaj.art-c5c9d3bdc2bc4a02bc46eb5fb01153332022-12-21T16:53:58ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782000-01-014710.3310/hta4070Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness.FrenchCowanMansourMorrisProcterHughesRobinsonGuillebaudhttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070 |
| spellingShingle | French Cowan Mansour Morris Procter Hughes Robinson Guillebaud Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment |
| title | Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. |
| title_full | Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. |
| title_fullStr | Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. |
| title_short | Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. |
| title_sort | implantable contraceptives subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems versus other forms of reversible contraceptives two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness acceptability tolerability and cost effectiveness |
| url | https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT french implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT cowan implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT mansour implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT morris implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT procter implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT hughes implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT robinson implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness AT guillebaud implantablecontraceptivessubdermalimplantsandhormonallyimpregnatedintrauterinesystemsversusotherformsofreversiblecontraceptivestwosystematicreviewstoassessrelativeeffectivenessacceptabilitytolerabilityandcosteffectiveness |