Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models

Simulations using IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)-class climate models are subject to fail or crash for a variety of reasons. Quantitative analysis of the failures can yield useful insights to better understand and improve the models. During the course of uncertainty quantificatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. D. Lucas, R. Klein, J. Tannahill, D. Ivanova, S. Brandon, D. Domyancic, Y. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-08-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1157/2013/gmd-6-1157-2013.pdf
_version_ 1818979846667108352
author D. D. Lucas
R. Klein
J. Tannahill
D. Ivanova
S. Brandon
D. Domyancic
Y. Zhang
author_facet D. D. Lucas
R. Klein
J. Tannahill
D. Ivanova
S. Brandon
D. Domyancic
Y. Zhang
author_sort D. D. Lucas
collection DOAJ
description Simulations using IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)-class climate models are subject to fail or crash for a variety of reasons. Quantitative analysis of the failures can yield useful insights to better understand and improve the models. During the course of uncertainty quantification (UQ) ensemble simulations to assess the effects of ocean model parameter uncertainties on climate simulations, we experienced a series of simulation crashes within the Parallel Ocean Program (POP2) component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4). About 8.5% of our CCSM4 simulations failed for numerical reasons at combinations of POP2 parameter values. We applied support vector machine (SVM) classification from machine learning to quantify and predict the probability of failure as a function of the values of 18 POP2 parameters. A committee of SVM classifiers readily predicted model failures in an independent validation ensemble, as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve metric (AUC > 0.96). The causes of the simulation failures were determined through a global sensitivity analysis. Combinations of 8 parameters related to ocean mixing and viscosity from three different POP2 parameterizations were the major sources of the failures. This information can be used to improve POP2 and CCSM4 by incorporating correlations across the relevant parameters. Our method can also be used to quantify, predict, and understand simulation crashes in other complex geoscientific models.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:06:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5d3e8cb0efe43f9b98f6ec3ccafe940
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:06:01Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-c5d3e8cb0efe43f9b98f6ec3ccafe9402022-12-21T19:32:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032013-08-01641157117110.5194/gmd-6-1157-2013Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate modelsD. D. LucasR. KleinJ. TannahillD. IvanovaS. BrandonD. DomyancicY. ZhangSimulations using IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)-class climate models are subject to fail or crash for a variety of reasons. Quantitative analysis of the failures can yield useful insights to better understand and improve the models. During the course of uncertainty quantification (UQ) ensemble simulations to assess the effects of ocean model parameter uncertainties on climate simulations, we experienced a series of simulation crashes within the Parallel Ocean Program (POP2) component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4). About 8.5% of our CCSM4 simulations failed for numerical reasons at combinations of POP2 parameter values. We applied support vector machine (SVM) classification from machine learning to quantify and predict the probability of failure as a function of the values of 18 POP2 parameters. A committee of SVM classifiers readily predicted model failures in an independent validation ensemble, as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve metric (AUC > 0.96). The causes of the simulation failures were determined through a global sensitivity analysis. Combinations of 8 parameters related to ocean mixing and viscosity from three different POP2 parameterizations were the major sources of the failures. This information can be used to improve POP2 and CCSM4 by incorporating correlations across the relevant parameters. Our method can also be used to quantify, predict, and understand simulation crashes in other complex geoscientific models.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1157/2013/gmd-6-1157-2013.pdf
spellingShingle D. D. Lucas
R. Klein
J. Tannahill
D. Ivanova
S. Brandon
D. Domyancic
Y. Zhang
Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
Geoscientific Model Development
title Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
title_full Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
title_fullStr Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
title_full_unstemmed Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
title_short Failure analysis of parameter-induced simulation crashes in climate models
title_sort failure analysis of parameter induced simulation crashes in climate models
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1157/2013/gmd-6-1157-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ddlucas failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT rklein failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT jtannahill failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT divanova failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT sbrandon failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT ddomyancic failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels
AT yzhang failureanalysisofparameterinducedsimulationcrashesinclimatemodels