Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785

The cattle disease rinderpest devastated Europe throughout the eighteenth century. The practice of preventative slaughter, or stamping out, has been seen as the most effective method of containing the disease. Historians frame this strategy as a measure of the effectiveness of centralized bureaucrac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filip Van Roosbroeck, Adam Sundberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: openjournals.nl 2018-01-01
Series:Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tseg.nl/article/view/8229
_version_ 1818199087712829440
author Filip Van Roosbroeck
Adam Sundberg
author_facet Filip Van Roosbroeck
Adam Sundberg
author_sort Filip Van Roosbroeck
collection DOAJ
description The cattle disease rinderpest devastated Europe throughout the eighteenth century. The practice of preventative slaughter, or stamping out, has been seen as the most effective method of containing the disease. Historians frame this strategy as a measure of the effectiveness of centralized bureaucracy in handling epidemic outbreaks. The Austrian Netherlands, which enacted a stamping out policy during the rinderpest epidemic of 1769-1785, is often cast opposite the decentralized Dutch Republic, which did not. That mortality was more severe in Holland than in Flanders is interpreted as a consequence of this difference. This article compares the disease management of Flanders and South Holland as well as the differential mortality of cattle in the initial years of the outbreak. We argue that stamping out should not be used as the standard for evaluating effective management. Both South Holland and Flanders relied on a high degree of state intervention. No strategies were universally effective. Explanations must be sought in regional socio-ecological structures. Rather than a consequence of state action or inaction, rinderpest mortality responded to the movement of cattle for pasturing and trade, structural differences in land use, and the resultant divergences in agricultural practices and herd management. Rather than state intervention, extensive commercial cattleholding explains the highly variable mortality.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:16:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5da079a51a24d5a81e8289afc09e6e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1572-1701
2468-9068
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:16:12Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher openjournals.nl
record_format Article
series Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis
spelling doaj.art-c5da079a51a24d5a81e8289afc09e6e42022-12-22T00:41:48Zengopenjournals.nlTijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis1572-17012468-90682018-01-01143Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785Filip Van Roosbroeck0Adam Sundberg1University of AntwerpCreighton University in Omaha, USAThe cattle disease rinderpest devastated Europe throughout the eighteenth century. The practice of preventative slaughter, or stamping out, has been seen as the most effective method of containing the disease. Historians frame this strategy as a measure of the effectiveness of centralized bureaucracy in handling epidemic outbreaks. The Austrian Netherlands, which enacted a stamping out policy during the rinderpest epidemic of 1769-1785, is often cast opposite the decentralized Dutch Republic, which did not. That mortality was more severe in Holland than in Flanders is interpreted as a consequence of this difference. This article compares the disease management of Flanders and South Holland as well as the differential mortality of cattle in the initial years of the outbreak. We argue that stamping out should not be used as the standard for evaluating effective management. Both South Holland and Flanders relied on a high degree of state intervention. No strategies were universally effective. Explanations must be sought in regional socio-ecological structures. Rather than a consequence of state action or inaction, rinderpest mortality responded to the movement of cattle for pasturing and trade, structural differences in land use, and the resultant divergences in agricultural practices and herd management. Rather than state intervention, extensive commercial cattleholding explains the highly variable mortality.https://tseg.nl/article/view/8229rinderpesteighteenth centuryregional economydisaster policy
spellingShingle Filip Van Roosbroeck
Adam Sundberg
Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis
rinderpest
eighteenth century
regional economy
disaster policy
title Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
title_full Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
title_fullStr Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
title_full_unstemmed Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
title_short Culling the Herds? Regional Divergences in Rinderpest Mortality in Flanders and South Holland, 1769-1785
title_sort culling the herds regional divergences in rinderpest mortality in flanders and south holland 1769 1785
topic rinderpest
eighteenth century
regional economy
disaster policy
url https://tseg.nl/article/view/8229
work_keys_str_mv AT filipvanroosbroeck cullingtheherdsregionaldivergencesinrinderpestmortalityinflandersandsouthholland17691785
AT adamsundberg cullingtheherdsregionaldivergencesinrinderpestmortalityinflandersandsouthholland17691785