Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Despite growing evidence of rapid evolution in protein coding genes, the contribution of positive selection to intra- and interspecific differences in protein coding regions of the genome is unclear. We attempted to see if genes coding for secreted proteins and g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McCulloch Alan, Mather Andrew, McEwan John, MacEachern Sean, Sunnucks Paul, Goddard Mike
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2006-04-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gsejournal.org/content/38/3/321
_version_ 1819087268444372992
author McCulloch Alan
Mather Andrew
McEwan John
MacEachern Sean
Sunnucks Paul
Goddard Mike
author_facet McCulloch Alan
Mather Andrew
McEwan John
MacEachern Sean
Sunnucks Paul
Goddard Mike
author_sort McCulloch Alan
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Despite growing evidence of rapid evolution in protein coding genes, the contribution of positive selection to intra- and interspecific differences in protein coding regions of the genome is unclear. We attempted to see if genes coding for secreted proteins and genes with narrow expression, specifically those preferentially expressed in the mammary gland, have diverged at a faster rate between domestic cattle (<it>Bos taurus</it>) and humans (<it>Homo sapiens</it>) than other genes and whether positive selection is responsible. Using a large data set, we identified groups of genes based on secretion and expression patterns and compared them for the rate of nonsynonymous (<it>dN</it>) and synonymous (<it>dS) </it>substitutions per site and the number of radical (<it>Dr</it>) and conservative (<it>Dc</it>) amino acid substitutions. We found evidence of rapid evolution in genes with narrow expression, especially for those expressed in the liver and mammary gland and for genes coding for secreted proteins. We compared common human polymorphism data with human-cattle divergence and found that genes with high evolutionary rates in human-cattle divergence also had a large number of common human polymorphisms. This argues against positive selection causing rapid divergence in these groups of genes. In most cases <it>dN</it>/<it>dS </it>ratios were lower in human-cattle divergence than in common human polymorphism presumably due to differences in the effectiveness of purifying selection between long-term divergence and short-term polymorphism.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:33:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5dde6910126408f9e917a7f9b2b840c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0999-193X
1297-9686
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:33:27Z
publishDate 2006-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genetics Selection Evolution
spelling doaj.art-c5dde6910126408f9e917a7f9b2b840c2022-12-21T18:49:33ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution0999-193X1297-96862006-04-0138332134110.1186/1297-9686-38-3-321Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptomeMcCulloch AlanMather AndrewMcEwan JohnMacEachern SeanSunnucks PaulGoddard Mike<p>Abstract</p> <p>Despite growing evidence of rapid evolution in protein coding genes, the contribution of positive selection to intra- and interspecific differences in protein coding regions of the genome is unclear. We attempted to see if genes coding for secreted proteins and genes with narrow expression, specifically those preferentially expressed in the mammary gland, have diverged at a faster rate between domestic cattle (<it>Bos taurus</it>) and humans (<it>Homo sapiens</it>) than other genes and whether positive selection is responsible. Using a large data set, we identified groups of genes based on secretion and expression patterns and compared them for the rate of nonsynonymous (<it>dN</it>) and synonymous (<it>dS) </it>substitutions per site and the number of radical (<it>Dr</it>) and conservative (<it>Dc</it>) amino acid substitutions. We found evidence of rapid evolution in genes with narrow expression, especially for those expressed in the liver and mammary gland and for genes coding for secreted proteins. We compared common human polymorphism data with human-cattle divergence and found that genes with high evolutionary rates in human-cattle divergence also had a large number of common human polymorphisms. This argues against positive selection causing rapid divergence in these groups of genes. In most cases <it>dN</it>/<it>dS </it>ratios were lower in human-cattle divergence than in common human polymorphism presumably due to differences in the effectiveness of purifying selection between long-term divergence and short-term polymorphism.</p>http://www.gsejournal.org/content/38/3/321adaptive evolution<it>Bos taurus</it><it>Homo sapiens</it>mammary glandtissue specific genes
spellingShingle McCulloch Alan
Mather Andrew
McEwan John
MacEachern Sean
Sunnucks Paul
Goddard Mike
Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
Genetics Selection Evolution
adaptive evolution
<it>Bos taurus</it>
<it>Homo sapiens</it>
mammary gland
tissue specific genes
title Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
title_full Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
title_fullStr Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
title_full_unstemmed Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
title_short Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data: a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
title_sort testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution using genomic data a comparison of the human and bovine transcriptome
topic adaptive evolution
<it>Bos taurus</it>
<it>Homo sapiens</it>
mammary gland
tissue specific genes
url http://www.gsejournal.org/content/38/3/321
work_keys_str_mv AT mccullochalan testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome
AT matherandrew testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome
AT mcewanjohn testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome
AT maceachernsean testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome
AT sunnuckspaul testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome
AT goddardmike testingtheneutraltheoryofmolecularevolutionusinggenomicdataacomparisonofthehumanandbovinetranscriptome