Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy

Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). Materials and Methods A total of 909 elderly non‐me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuiqing He, Yan‐Ling Wu, Yongxiang Gao, Danjie He, Ying Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789
_version_ 1827259922825347072
author Shuiqing He
Yan‐Ling Wu
Yongxiang Gao
Danjie He
Ying Huang
author_facet Shuiqing He
Yan‐Ling Wu
Yongxiang Gao
Danjie He
Ying Huang
author_sort Shuiqing He
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). Materials and Methods A total of 909 elderly non‐metastatic NPC patients treated with cisplatin‐based CCRT or IC + CCRT between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Prognostic nomograms were generated according to clinical characteristics and serum biomarkers. The survival outcomes of patients treated with CCRT versus IC + CCRT were compared in three well‐matched risk groups (high, medium, and low risk) after PSM analysis. Benefit of IC in people older or younger than 70 years and effect of different IC regimens and cycles on prognosis were analyzed. Results Nomograms of overall survival (OS) (C‐index: 0.64, 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) and disease special survival (DSS) (C‐index: 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62–0.71) showed good prognostic accuracy. The nomogram for DSS included variables of age, gender, ACE, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. OS included variables of age, smoking history, ACE, ALB, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. The corresponding 5‐year OS rates of high, medium and low risk groups were 87.4%, 82.2%, and 60.9%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 5‐year DSS rates were 92.2%, 84.3%, and 69.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high risk group, IC + CCRT led to significantly higher 5‐year OS and DSS rate compared with CCRT (5‐year OS rate, 73.5% versus 51.8%, p = 0.006; 5‐year DSS rate, 81.4% versus 61.3%, p = 0.002). While in the medium and low risk groups, OS and DSS were not significantly different (OS: p = 0.259, 0.186; DSS: p = 0.29, 0.094). Subgroup analysis showed in the high risk group, only people younger than 70 years old could benefit from IC. TPF and IC cycles of three could lead to the best survival results. Conclusion Compared with CCRT, OS, and DSS among high risk elderly patients were significantly improved by the addition of IC in patients younger than 70 years old. TPF and three IC cycles were recommended.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:56:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5def1d35c3143fe830d647a65c0b6cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-22T02:34:17Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c5def1d35c3143fe830d647a65c0b6cb2024-05-04T06:40:57ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-05-01129105361055210.1002/cam4.5789Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapyShuiqing He0Yan‐Ling Wu1Yongxiang Gao2Danjie He3Ying Huang4Department of Radiation Oncology Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen ChinaDepartment of Data Mining and Analysis Guangzhou Tianpeng Technology Co., Ltd Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine Guangzhou ChinaAbstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). Materials and Methods A total of 909 elderly non‐metastatic NPC patients treated with cisplatin‐based CCRT or IC + CCRT between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Prognostic nomograms were generated according to clinical characteristics and serum biomarkers. The survival outcomes of patients treated with CCRT versus IC + CCRT were compared in three well‐matched risk groups (high, medium, and low risk) after PSM analysis. Benefit of IC in people older or younger than 70 years and effect of different IC regimens and cycles on prognosis were analyzed. Results Nomograms of overall survival (OS) (C‐index: 0.64, 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) and disease special survival (DSS) (C‐index: 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62–0.71) showed good prognostic accuracy. The nomogram for DSS included variables of age, gender, ACE, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. OS included variables of age, smoking history, ACE, ALB, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. The corresponding 5‐year OS rates of high, medium and low risk groups were 87.4%, 82.2%, and 60.9%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 5‐year DSS rates were 92.2%, 84.3%, and 69.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high risk group, IC + CCRT led to significantly higher 5‐year OS and DSS rate compared with CCRT (5‐year OS rate, 73.5% versus 51.8%, p = 0.006; 5‐year DSS rate, 81.4% versus 61.3%, p = 0.002). While in the medium and low risk groups, OS and DSS were not significantly different (OS: p = 0.259, 0.186; DSS: p = 0.29, 0.094). Subgroup analysis showed in the high risk group, only people younger than 70 years old could benefit from IC. TPF and IC cycles of three could lead to the best survival results. Conclusion Compared with CCRT, OS, and DSS among high risk elderly patients were significantly improved by the addition of IC in patients younger than 70 years old. TPF and three IC cycles were recommended.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789concurrent chemotherapyelderlyEpstein–Barr virusinduction chemotherapynasopharyngeal carcinomaprognostic nomograms
spellingShingle Shuiqing He
Yan‐Ling Wu
Yongxiang Gao
Danjie He
Ying Huang
Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
Cancer Medicine
concurrent chemotherapy
elderly
Epstein–Barr virus
induction chemotherapy
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
prognostic nomograms
title Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_full Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_fullStr Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_short Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_sort risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
topic concurrent chemotherapy
elderly
Epstein–Barr virus
induction chemotherapy
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
prognostic nomograms
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789
work_keys_str_mv AT shuiqinghe riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT yanlingwu riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT yongxianggao riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT danjiehe riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT yinghuang riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy