The Realism of Purposes: Schelling and Hegel on Kant’s Critique of Teleological Judgement
The paper addresses Schelling’s and Hegel’s interpretation of Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement (1790), focusing especially on the so-called ‘problem of teleology.’ We reconstruct Schelling’s and Hegel’s reading of the second part of the Critique, dedicated to ‘teleological judgement’ and th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7080 |
Summary: | The paper addresses Schelling’s and Hegel’s interpretation of Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement (1790), focusing especially on the so-called ‘problem of teleology.’ We reconstruct Schelling’s and Hegel’s reading of the second part of the Critique, dedicated to ‘teleological judgement’ and the question of natural purposiveness. We first propose a brief reconstruction of Kant’s argument about the possibility of using teleological judgment with reference to nature; we then show why Hegel and Schelling were unsatisfied with Kant’s argument; Finally, we argue that Schelling’s and Hegel’s dissatisfaction with the Kantian theory of teleological judgement led them to move beyond Kant, towards a different understanding of the relation between epistemology and ontology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-6212 2421-5864 |