Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus

Category: Ankle; Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex pathology of the foot that often results from dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon (PTTD) and encompasses a wide spectrum of deformity. A high-degree of continued morbidity f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kempland C. Walley MD, Chris M. Stauch, Jeremy Silver, Patrick Wise BSc, Thomas Harper, Christopher Ehret, Jesse King BSc, Mark Dunleavy, Paul J. Juliano MD, Michael C. Aynardi MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00486
_version_ 1818329215007719424
author Kempland C. Walley MD
Chris M. Stauch
Jeremy Silver
Patrick Wise BSc
Thomas Harper
Christopher Ehret
Jesse King BSc
Mark Dunleavy
Paul J. Juliano MD
Michael C. Aynardi MD
author_facet Kempland C. Walley MD
Chris M. Stauch
Jeremy Silver
Patrick Wise BSc
Thomas Harper
Christopher Ehret
Jesse King BSc
Mark Dunleavy
Paul J. Juliano MD
Michael C. Aynardi MD
author_sort Kempland C. Walley MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Ankle; Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex pathology of the foot that often results from dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon (PTTD) and encompasses a wide spectrum of deformity. A high-degree of continued morbidity following flatfoot reconstruction exists for which prognostic indicators of future poor outcomes are uncertain. AP and lateral weight-bearing radiographs are commonly utilized to assess the severity of deformity including forefoot abduction, medial arch collapse, and hindfoot valgus. However, the relationship between pre-operative radiographic severity of deformity and predilection for future surgical treatment failure remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to perform pre-operative radiographic measurements of patients with stage IIb PTTD and determine which preoperative radiographic parameters, if any, predict future surgical treatment failure. Methods: Following IRB approval, an institutional electronic medical record database was queried from January 2000-2014 to identify all patients undergoing surgical correction for stage IIb PTTD. 256 patients with stage IIb PTTD underwent medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer, with possible spring ligament repair and/or Achilles lengthening. Patients undergoing concomitant lateral column lengthening or midfoot fusion, patients with previous hardware, and patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. Preoperative radiographs were retrospectively analyzed to assess preoperative deformity. Talonavicular coverage angle was measured using AP radiographs. Lateral radiographs were used to measure talar-1st metatarsal angle (Meary’s) angle, calcaneal pitch and medial cuneiform-floor height. Patient charts were also reviewed to determine whether patients experienced treatment failure, defined as return to the operating room for unplanned revision surgery (e.g. broken/painful hardware, nonunion, residual deformity, infection, nerve damage, blood clot/DVT). The degree of pre-operative deformity was compared between treatment failure and non-failure groups. Results: Out of the 256 patient cohort, a total of 58 patients (22.7%) experienced treatment failure indicated by the need for an unplanned revision surgery, while 198 patients (77.3%) did not experience failure. There were no significant differences in the severity of pre-operative radiographic deformity between the treatment failure and non-failure groups including Meary’s angle (p = 0.93), calcaneal pitch (p = 0.70), talonavicular coverage angle (p = 0.99), and medial cuneiform height (p = 0.52, Table 1). Conclusion: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in pre-operative radiographic deformity between patients who experienced failure versus non-failure following surgical flatfoot correction suggesting that the degree of pre- operative deformity is not significantly associated with an increased risk for future surgical failure. The analysis of these results, may underscore the relative importance of the physical exam in the evaluation of patients with symptomatic stage IIb PTTD and a relative lack of prognostic value in radiographic parameters commonly used to describe patients’ deformity.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:44:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5f5410f0f174a9cb2d19ff270beafa9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:44:31Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-c5f5410f0f174a9cb2d19ff270beafa92022-12-21T23:45:33ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142020-10-01510.1177/2473011420S00486Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes PlanusKempland C. Walley MDChris M. StauchJeremy SilverPatrick Wise BScThomas HarperChristopher EhretJesse King BScMark DunleavyPaul J. Juliano MDMichael C. Aynardi MDCategory: Ankle; Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex pathology of the foot that often results from dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon (PTTD) and encompasses a wide spectrum of deformity. A high-degree of continued morbidity following flatfoot reconstruction exists for which prognostic indicators of future poor outcomes are uncertain. AP and lateral weight-bearing radiographs are commonly utilized to assess the severity of deformity including forefoot abduction, medial arch collapse, and hindfoot valgus. However, the relationship between pre-operative radiographic severity of deformity and predilection for future surgical treatment failure remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to perform pre-operative radiographic measurements of patients with stage IIb PTTD and determine which preoperative radiographic parameters, if any, predict future surgical treatment failure. Methods: Following IRB approval, an institutional electronic medical record database was queried from January 2000-2014 to identify all patients undergoing surgical correction for stage IIb PTTD. 256 patients with stage IIb PTTD underwent medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer, with possible spring ligament repair and/or Achilles lengthening. Patients undergoing concomitant lateral column lengthening or midfoot fusion, patients with previous hardware, and patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. Preoperative radiographs were retrospectively analyzed to assess preoperative deformity. Talonavicular coverage angle was measured using AP radiographs. Lateral radiographs were used to measure talar-1st metatarsal angle (Meary’s) angle, calcaneal pitch and medial cuneiform-floor height. Patient charts were also reviewed to determine whether patients experienced treatment failure, defined as return to the operating room for unplanned revision surgery (e.g. broken/painful hardware, nonunion, residual deformity, infection, nerve damage, blood clot/DVT). The degree of pre-operative deformity was compared between treatment failure and non-failure groups. Results: Out of the 256 patient cohort, a total of 58 patients (22.7%) experienced treatment failure indicated by the need for an unplanned revision surgery, while 198 patients (77.3%) did not experience failure. There were no significant differences in the severity of pre-operative radiographic deformity between the treatment failure and non-failure groups including Meary’s angle (p = 0.93), calcaneal pitch (p = 0.70), talonavicular coverage angle (p = 0.99), and medial cuneiform height (p = 0.52, Table 1). Conclusion: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in pre-operative radiographic deformity between patients who experienced failure versus non-failure following surgical flatfoot correction suggesting that the degree of pre- operative deformity is not significantly associated with an increased risk for future surgical failure. The analysis of these results, may underscore the relative importance of the physical exam in the evaluation of patients with symptomatic stage IIb PTTD and a relative lack of prognostic value in radiographic parameters commonly used to describe patients’ deformity.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00486
spellingShingle Kempland C. Walley MD
Chris M. Stauch
Jeremy Silver
Patrick Wise BSc
Thomas Harper
Christopher Ehret
Jesse King BSc
Mark Dunleavy
Paul J. Juliano MD
Michael C. Aynardi MD
Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
title_full Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
title_fullStr Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
title_short Pre-Operative Radiographic Parameters of Arch Collapse Do Not Predict Future Treatment Failure in Patients with Stage IIb Pes Planus
title_sort pre operative radiographic parameters of arch collapse do not predict future treatment failure in patients with stage iib pes planus
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00486
work_keys_str_mv AT kemplandcwalleymd preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT chrismstauch preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT jeremysilver preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT patrickwisebsc preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT thomasharper preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT christopherehret preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT jessekingbsc preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT markdunleavy preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT pauljjulianomd preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus
AT michaelcaynardimd preoperativeradiographicparametersofarchcollapsedonotpredictfuturetreatmentfailureinpatientswithstageiibpesplanus