A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children

Background and Aims: We studied the efficacy and safety of different total intravenous anesthesia used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods: Children of 1–7 years age (n = 88), undergoing MRI received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min, ketamine 1 m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhuvaneswari Balasubramanian, Anila D Malde, Shantanu B Kulkarni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2019;volume=35;issue=3;spage=379;epage=385;aulast=Balasubramanian
_version_ 1819098049623883776
author Bhuvaneswari Balasubramanian
Anila D Malde
Shantanu B Kulkarni
author_facet Bhuvaneswari Balasubramanian
Anila D Malde
Shantanu B Kulkarni
author_sort Bhuvaneswari Balasubramanian
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: We studied the efficacy and safety of different total intravenous anesthesia used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods: Children of 1–7 years age (n = 88), undergoing MRI received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min, ketamine 1 mg/kg, and propofol 1 mg/kg in sequence. University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) of 3 was considered an acceptable level for starting the scan. Rescue ketamine 0.25–0.5 mg/kg was given if UMSS remained <3. After the loading dose of drugs, some children attained UMSS = 4 or progressive decline in heart rate, therefore, did not receive any infusion. The rest received either dexmedetomidine (0.7 μg/kg/h) (n = 35) or propofol (3 mg/kg/h) (n = 38) infusion for maintenance. Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg was used as rescue. Sedation failure was considered if either there was inability to complete the scan at the pre-set infusion rate, or there was need for >3 ketamine boluses or serious adverse events occurred. Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20 was used for analysis. Results: Initiation of scan was 100% successful with median induction time of 10 min. Maintenance of sedation was successful in 100% with dexmedetomidine and 97.4% with propofol infusion. Recovery time (25 min v/s 30 min), discharge time (35 min v/s 60 min), and total care duration (80 min v/s 105 min) were significantly less with propofol as compared to dexmedetomidine (P = 0.002, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively). There were no significant adverse events observed. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg, ketamine 1 mg/kg, and propofol 1 mg/kg provide good conditions for initiation of MRI. Although dexmedetomidine at 0.7μg/kg/h and propofol at 3 mg/kg/h are safe and effective for maintenance, propofol provides faster recovery.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:24:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5f709bdadf94cafa323e5a7733cc0b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9185
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:24:48Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-c5f709bdadf94cafa323e5a7733cc0b92022-12-21T18:45:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852019-01-0135337938510.4103/joacp.JOACP_289_17A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in childrenBhuvaneswari BalasubramanianAnila D MaldeShantanu B KulkarniBackground and Aims: We studied the efficacy and safety of different total intravenous anesthesia used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods: Children of 1–7 years age (n = 88), undergoing MRI received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min, ketamine 1 mg/kg, and propofol 1 mg/kg in sequence. University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) of 3 was considered an acceptable level for starting the scan. Rescue ketamine 0.25–0.5 mg/kg was given if UMSS remained <3. After the loading dose of drugs, some children attained UMSS = 4 or progressive decline in heart rate, therefore, did not receive any infusion. The rest received either dexmedetomidine (0.7 μg/kg/h) (n = 35) or propofol (3 mg/kg/h) (n = 38) infusion for maintenance. Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg was used as rescue. Sedation failure was considered if either there was inability to complete the scan at the pre-set infusion rate, or there was need for >3 ketamine boluses or serious adverse events occurred. Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20 was used for analysis. Results: Initiation of scan was 100% successful with median induction time of 10 min. Maintenance of sedation was successful in 100% with dexmedetomidine and 97.4% with propofol infusion. Recovery time (25 min v/s 30 min), discharge time (35 min v/s 60 min), and total care duration (80 min v/s 105 min) were significantly less with propofol as compared to dexmedetomidine (P = 0.002, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively). There were no significant adverse events observed. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg, ketamine 1 mg/kg, and propofol 1 mg/kg provide good conditions for initiation of MRI. Although dexmedetomidine at 0.7μg/kg/h and propofol at 3 mg/kg/h are safe and effective for maintenance, propofol provides faster recovery.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2019;volume=35;issue=3;spage=379;epage=385;aulast=BalasubramanianAmbulatorydexmedetomidineketaminemagnetic resonance imagingpediatricpropofolsedation
spellingShingle Bhuvaneswari Balasubramanian
Anila D Malde
Shantanu B Kulkarni
A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Ambulatory
dexmedetomidine
ketamine
magnetic resonance imaging
pediatric
propofol
sedation
title A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
title_full A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
title_fullStr A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
title_full_unstemmed A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
title_short A non-randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
title_sort non randomized controlled study of total intravenous anesthesia regimens for magnetic resonance imaging studies in children
topic Ambulatory
dexmedetomidine
ketamine
magnetic resonance imaging
pediatric
propofol
sedation
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2019;volume=35;issue=3;spage=379;epage=385;aulast=Balasubramanian
work_keys_str_mv AT bhuvaneswaribalasubramanian anonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren
AT aniladmalde anonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren
AT shantanubkulkarni anonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren
AT bhuvaneswaribalasubramanian nonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren
AT aniladmalde nonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren
AT shantanubkulkarni nonrandomizedcontrolledstudyoftotalintravenousanesthesiaregimensformagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinchildren