Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences

Aim. To study and compare genotypic and phenotypic signs in patients with non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), to conduct a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and 5-year cumulative survival of patients with NCM and DCM.Material and methods. The study included...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. G. Vaykhanskaya, L. N. Sivitskaya, O. D. Levdansky, T. V. Kurushko, N. G. Danilenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 2022-11-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5191
_version_ 1826561013212774400
author T. G. Vaykhanskaya
L. N. Sivitskaya
O. D. Levdansky
T. V. Kurushko
N. G. Danilenko
author_facet T. G. Vaykhanskaya
L. N. Sivitskaya
O. D. Levdansky
T. V. Kurushko
N. G. Danilenko
author_sort T. G. Vaykhanskaya
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To study and compare genotypic and phenotypic signs in patients with non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), to conduct a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and 5-year cumulative survival of patients with NCM and DCM.Material and methods. The study included 144 unrelated patients with cardiomyopathy: NCM (n=74) and DCM (n=70). Mean age was 39 [30; 49] years (men, 96 (66,7%); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 30,5 [24; 46]%. A comprehensive clinical examination included electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography, DNA diagnostics (NGS+Sanger), cascade screening, and cosegregation analysis. To assess clinical outcomes, the NCM group was divided into 2 subtypes according to baseline LV systolic function (NCM/DCM phenotype — 50 individuals with LVEF ≤49%; and isolated NCM — 24 patients with LVEF ≥50%). The following adverse events were assessed as the composite endpoint: cardiovascular death, heart transplantation (HT), sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cerebral thromboembolism. The follow-up period was 62 months.Results. Among patients with LVEF ≤49% at a 5-year follow-up, 37 (74,0%) of 50 patients with the NCM/DCM phenotype and 41 (58,6%) of 70 patients with DCM achieved composite endpoint. Out of 24 patients with NCM with LVEF ≥50% (median LVEF, 56 [51; 61]%), 2 (8,3%) patients achieved composite endpoint (χ2=28,8; p=0,001). In the NCM/DCM group with LVEF ≤49%, a higher level of pathogenic genetic variants (64% vs 41,4%/DCM vs 29,2%/NCM; χ2=11,4; p=0,003), cerebral thromboembolism (χ2=11,8; p=0,003) and HT (χ2=10,6; p=0,005). The results of the 5-year survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed a worse prognosis for NCM with LVEF ≤49% compared with DCM (log rang: χ2=11,5; p=0,001) and isolated NCM (log rang: χ2=17,02; p=0,0001). In the overall cohort (n=144), gene-positivity was also associated with worse prognosis (log rang: χ2=5,38; p=0,02).Conclusion. In the present study, patients with dilated subtype of NCM showed a worse prognosis compared with DCM and isolated NCM. Heart failure progression and cerebral thromboembolism were the most common complications in patients with NCM/DCM.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:43:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5f9e278c9d6446fafc1b7da151646ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T09:25:25Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
record_format Article
series Российский кардиологический журнал
spelling doaj.art-c5f9e278c9d6446fafc1b7da151646ae2025-03-02T11:42:59Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202022-11-01271010.15829/1560-4071-2022-51913660Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differencesT. G. Vaykhanskaya0L. N. Sivitskaya1O. D. Levdansky2T. V. Kurushko3N. G. Danilenko4Republican Scientific and Practical Center "Cardiology"Genomed Health Care CentreInstitute of Genetics and CytologyRepublican Scientific and Practical Center "Cardiology"Institute of Genetics and CytologyAim. To study and compare genotypic and phenotypic signs in patients with non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), to conduct a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and 5-year cumulative survival of patients with NCM and DCM.Material and methods. The study included 144 unrelated patients with cardiomyopathy: NCM (n=74) and DCM (n=70). Mean age was 39 [30; 49] years (men, 96 (66,7%); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 30,5 [24; 46]%. A comprehensive clinical examination included electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography, DNA diagnostics (NGS+Sanger), cascade screening, and cosegregation analysis. To assess clinical outcomes, the NCM group was divided into 2 subtypes according to baseline LV systolic function (NCM/DCM phenotype — 50 individuals with LVEF ≤49%; and isolated NCM — 24 patients with LVEF ≥50%). The following adverse events were assessed as the composite endpoint: cardiovascular death, heart transplantation (HT), sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cerebral thromboembolism. The follow-up period was 62 months.Results. Among patients with LVEF ≤49% at a 5-year follow-up, 37 (74,0%) of 50 patients with the NCM/DCM phenotype and 41 (58,6%) of 70 patients with DCM achieved composite endpoint. Out of 24 patients with NCM with LVEF ≥50% (median LVEF, 56 [51; 61]%), 2 (8,3%) patients achieved composite endpoint (χ2=28,8; p=0,001). In the NCM/DCM group with LVEF ≤49%, a higher level of pathogenic genetic variants (64% vs 41,4%/DCM vs 29,2%/NCM; χ2=11,4; p=0,003), cerebral thromboembolism (χ2=11,8; p=0,003) and HT (χ2=10,6; p=0,005). The results of the 5-year survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed a worse prognosis for NCM with LVEF ≤49% compared with DCM (log rang: χ2=11,5; p=0,001) and isolated NCM (log rang: χ2=17,02; p=0,0001). In the overall cohort (n=144), gene-positivity was also associated with worse prognosis (log rang: χ2=5,38; p=0,02).Conclusion. In the present study, patients with dilated subtype of NCM showed a worse prognosis compared with DCM and isolated NCM. Heart failure progression and cerebral thromboembolism were the most common complications in patients with NCM/DCM.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5191non-compaction cardiomyopathydilated cardiomyopathyphenotypegenotypethromboembolic eventsprognosis
spellingShingle T. G. Vaykhanskaya
L. N. Sivitskaya
O. D. Levdansky
T. V. Kurushko
N. G. Danilenko
Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
Российский кардиологический журнал
non-compaction cardiomyopathy
dilated cardiomyopathy
phenotype
genotype
thromboembolic events
prognosis
title Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
title_full Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
title_fullStr Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
title_full_unstemmed Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
title_short Non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy: genotypic, phenotypic and prognostic differences
title_sort non compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy genotypic phenotypic and prognostic differences
topic non-compaction cardiomyopathy
dilated cardiomyopathy
phenotype
genotype
thromboembolic events
prognosis
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5191
work_keys_str_mv AT tgvaykhanskaya noncompactionanddilatedcardiomyopathygenotypicphenotypicandprognosticdifferences
AT lnsivitskaya noncompactionanddilatedcardiomyopathygenotypicphenotypicandprognosticdifferences
AT odlevdansky noncompactionanddilatedcardiomyopathygenotypicphenotypicandprognosticdifferences
AT tvkurushko noncompactionanddilatedcardiomyopathygenotypicphenotypicandprognosticdifferences
AT ngdanilenko noncompactionanddilatedcardiomyopathygenotypicphenotypicandprognosticdifferences