Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus

Introduction: Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus (LP) are uncommon and may not always have classical clinical features of LP. A variety of morphological types has been described in literature. Aim and Objectives: The aim was to study and classify the clinical variants into distinct easily recogni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Surabhi Sinha, Rashmi Sarkar, Vijay Kumar Garg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2018;volume=63;issue=1;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Sinha
_version_ 1819229785273925632
author Surabhi Sinha
Rashmi Sarkar
Vijay Kumar Garg
author_facet Surabhi Sinha
Rashmi Sarkar
Vijay Kumar Garg
author_sort Surabhi Sinha
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus (LP) are uncommon and may not always have classical clinical features of LP. A variety of morphological types has been described in literature. Aim and Objectives: The aim was to study and classify the clinical variants into distinct easily recognisable categories for quick recognition and early treatment initiation. Methods: All patients diagnosed with LP over a period of 5 years were evaluated for palmoplantar lesions in our hospital. The clinical and histopathological features of the palmoplantar lesions were then studied. Results: Out of 424 patients of LP, 55 (12.9%) had palmoplantar lesions. Histopathology was consistent or at least compatible with LP in 44/55 patients. For the purpose of assessment, only patients with histopathology consistent with LP were included (n = 44) in the study. Just over half of the patients were male, with most patients (43.2%) having had LP lesions elsewhere for 6 months before palmoplantar lesions were noticed. Soles were more frequently involved than palms. The sites most often involved were the centre of the palms (45.2%), and the instep of the soles (63.9%). The predominant morphological presentation was psoriasiform (47.7%). One patient had ulcerative lesions of LP on both his soles which is a very rare variant. Notably, nearly half of the patients (20/44) had mucosal (mostly oral) lesions characteristic of LP. This was significant as typical oral lesions of LP help in identifying palmoplantar lesions that do not have classical lichenoid morphology. Conclusion: LP lesions on palms and soles need to be identified keeping a high index of suspicion and differentiated from other papulosquamous conditions so that specific treatment can be initiated early.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T11:18:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c625e1c6f9ea4ee9aec4cc2b5b4f6c4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T11:18:41Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
spelling doaj.art-c625e1c6f9ea4ee9aec4cc2b5b4f6c4c2022-12-21T17:49:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112018-01-01631576110.4103/ijd.IJD_161_17Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planusSurabhi SinhaRashmi SarkarVijay Kumar GargIntroduction: Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus (LP) are uncommon and may not always have classical clinical features of LP. A variety of morphological types has been described in literature. Aim and Objectives: The aim was to study and classify the clinical variants into distinct easily recognisable categories for quick recognition and early treatment initiation. Methods: All patients diagnosed with LP over a period of 5 years were evaluated for palmoplantar lesions in our hospital. The clinical and histopathological features of the palmoplantar lesions were then studied. Results: Out of 424 patients of LP, 55 (12.9%) had palmoplantar lesions. Histopathology was consistent or at least compatible with LP in 44/55 patients. For the purpose of assessment, only patients with histopathology consistent with LP were included (n = 44) in the study. Just over half of the patients were male, with most patients (43.2%) having had LP lesions elsewhere for 6 months before palmoplantar lesions were noticed. Soles were more frequently involved than palms. The sites most often involved were the centre of the palms (45.2%), and the instep of the soles (63.9%). The predominant morphological presentation was psoriasiform (47.7%). One patient had ulcerative lesions of LP on both his soles which is a very rare variant. Notably, nearly half of the patients (20/44) had mucosal (mostly oral) lesions characteristic of LP. This was significant as typical oral lesions of LP help in identifying palmoplantar lesions that do not have classical lichenoid morphology. Conclusion: LP lesions on palms and soles need to be identified keeping a high index of suspicion and differentiated from other papulosquamous conditions so that specific treatment can be initiated early.http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2018;volume=63;issue=1;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=SinhaEczematoushyperkeratoticlichen planuspalmoplantarpsoriasiform
spellingShingle Surabhi Sinha
Rashmi Sarkar
Vijay Kumar Garg
Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Eczematous
hyperkeratotic
lichen planus
palmoplantar
psoriasiform
title Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
title_full Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
title_fullStr Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
title_full_unstemmed Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
title_short Palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
title_sort palmoplantar lesions of lichen planus
topic Eczematous
hyperkeratotic
lichen planus
palmoplantar
psoriasiform
url http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2018;volume=63;issue=1;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Sinha
work_keys_str_mv AT surabhisinha palmoplantarlesionsoflichenplanus
AT rashmisarkar palmoplantarlesionsoflichenplanus
AT vijaykumargarg palmoplantarlesionsoflichenplanus