Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years real-time PCR has become a leading technique for nucleic acid detection and quantification. These assays have the potential to greatly enhance efficiency in the clinical laboratory. Choice of primer and probe sequence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gardner Shea N, Lemmon Gordon H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-09-01
Series:Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
Online Access:http://www.ann-clinmicrob.com/content/7/1/18
_version_ 1819034754583887872
author Gardner Shea N
Lemmon Gordon H
author_facet Gardner Shea N
Lemmon Gordon H
author_sort Gardner Shea N
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years real-time PCR has become a leading technique for nucleic acid detection and quantification. These assays have the potential to greatly enhance efficiency in the clinical laboratory. Choice of primer and probe sequences is critical for accurate diagnosis in the clinic, yet current primer/probe signature design strategies are limited, and signature evaluation methods are lacking.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We assessed the quality of a signature by predicting the number of true positive, false positive and false negative hits against all available public sequence data. We found real-time PCR signatures described in recent literature and used a BLAST search based approach to collect all hits to the primer-probe combinations that should be amplified by real-time PCR chemistry. We then compared our hits with the sequences in the NCBI taxonomy tree that the signature was designed to detect.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that many published signatures have high specificity (almost no false positives) but low sensitivity (high false negative rate). Where high sensitivity is needed, we offer a revised methodology for signature design which may designate that multiple signatures are required to detect all sequenced strains. We use this methodology to produce new signatures that are predicted to have higher sensitivity and specificity.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We show that current methods for real-time PCR assay design have unacceptably low sensitivities for most clinical applications. Additionally, as new sequence data becomes available, old assays must be reassessed and redesigned. A standard protocol for both generating and assessing the quality of these assays is therefore of great value. Real-time PCR has the capacity to greatly improve clinical diagnostics. The improved assay design and evaluation methods presented herein will expedite adoption of this technique in the clinical lab.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:38:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6344a9194684db0a8f5f5310c3d124c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-0711
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:38:46Z
publishDate 2008-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
spelling doaj.art-c6344a9194684db0a8f5f5310c3d124c2022-12-21T19:11:22ZengBMCAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials1476-07112008-09-01711810.1186/1476-0711-7-18Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assaysGardner Shea NLemmon Gordon H<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years real-time PCR has become a leading technique for nucleic acid detection and quantification. These assays have the potential to greatly enhance efficiency in the clinical laboratory. Choice of primer and probe sequences is critical for accurate diagnosis in the clinic, yet current primer/probe signature design strategies are limited, and signature evaluation methods are lacking.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We assessed the quality of a signature by predicting the number of true positive, false positive and false negative hits against all available public sequence data. We found real-time PCR signatures described in recent literature and used a BLAST search based approach to collect all hits to the primer-probe combinations that should be amplified by real-time PCR chemistry. We then compared our hits with the sequences in the NCBI taxonomy tree that the signature was designed to detect.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that many published signatures have high specificity (almost no false positives) but low sensitivity (high false negative rate). Where high sensitivity is needed, we offer a revised methodology for signature design which may designate that multiple signatures are required to detect all sequenced strains. We use this methodology to produce new signatures that are predicted to have higher sensitivity and specificity.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We show that current methods for real-time PCR assay design have unacceptably low sensitivities for most clinical applications. Additionally, as new sequence data becomes available, old assays must be reassessed and redesigned. A standard protocol for both generating and assessing the quality of these assays is therefore of great value. Real-time PCR has the capacity to greatly improve clinical diagnostics. The improved assay design and evaluation methods presented herein will expedite adoption of this technique in the clinical lab.</p>http://www.ann-clinmicrob.com/content/7/1/18
spellingShingle Gardner Shea N
Lemmon Gordon H
Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
title Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
title_full Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
title_fullStr Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
title_short Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays
title_sort predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real time pcr assays
url http://www.ann-clinmicrob.com/content/7/1/18
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnershean predictingthesensitivityandspecificityofpublishedrealtimepcrassays
AT lemmongordonh predictingthesensitivityandspecificityofpublishedrealtimepcrassays