Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia

Abstract Objective: There has been increased use of prescription opioid analgesics in Australia in the past 20 years with increasing evidence of related problems. A number of data sources collect information about the dispensed prescribing for opioid medications, but little is known about the extent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha A. Hollingworth, Martyn Symons, Mohsina Khatun, Bill Loveday, Sue Ballantyne, Wayne D. Hall, Jake M. Najman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-04-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12030
_version_ 1797722367389073408
author Samantha A. Hollingworth
Martyn Symons
Mohsina Khatun
Bill Loveday
Sue Ballantyne
Wayne D. Hall
Jake M. Najman
author_facet Samantha A. Hollingworth
Martyn Symons
Mohsina Khatun
Bill Loveday
Sue Ballantyne
Wayne D. Hall
Jake M. Najman
author_sort Samantha A. Hollingworth
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: There has been increased use of prescription opioid analgesics in Australia in the past 20 years with increasing evidence of related problems. A number of data sources collect information about the dispensed prescribing for opioid medications, but little is known about the extent to which these data sources agree on levels of opioid prescribing. Methods: In Queensland, all opioid prescriptions (S8 prescriptions) dispensed by community pharmacies must be submitted to the Drugs of Dependence Unit (DDU). This potentially comprises a ‘gold standard’ against which other data sources may be judged. There are two national data sources: the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (PBS) for all medications subsidised by government; and an annual national survey of representative pharmacies, which assesses non‐subsidised opioid prescribing. We examined the agreement between these data sources. Results: The three data sources provided consistent estimates of use over time. The correlations between different data sources were high for most opioid analgesics. There was a substantial (60%) increase in the dispensed use of opioid analgesics and a 180% increase in the dispensed use of oxycodone over the period 2002–2009. Tramadol was the most used opioid‐like medication. Conclusions: Since 2002 different data sources reveal similar trends, namely a substantial increase in the prescribing of opioid medications. With few exceptions, the conclusions derived from using any of these data sources were similar. Implications: Improved access to PBS data for relevant stakeholders could provide an efficient and cost‐effective way to monitor use of prescription opioid analgesics.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:47:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c638f1430c744bea9e90b042449c8df4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:47:29Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-c638f1430c744bea9e90b042449c8df42023-09-02T12:48:39ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052013-04-0137213213810.1111/1753-6405.12030Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in AustraliaSamantha A. Hollingworth0Martyn Symons1Mohsina Khatun2Bill Loveday3Sue Ballantyne4Wayne D. Hall5Jake M. Najman6School of Pharmacy, The University of QueenslandDrugs of Dependence Unit, Queensland HealthSchool of Population Health, The University of QueenslandDrugs of Dependence Unit, Queensland HealthDrugs of Dependence Unit, Queensland HealthCentre for Clinical Research, The University of QueenslandSchool of Population Health, The University of QueenslandAbstract Objective: There has been increased use of prescription opioid analgesics in Australia in the past 20 years with increasing evidence of related problems. A number of data sources collect information about the dispensed prescribing for opioid medications, but little is known about the extent to which these data sources agree on levels of opioid prescribing. Methods: In Queensland, all opioid prescriptions (S8 prescriptions) dispensed by community pharmacies must be submitted to the Drugs of Dependence Unit (DDU). This potentially comprises a ‘gold standard’ against which other data sources may be judged. There are two national data sources: the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (PBS) for all medications subsidised by government; and an annual national survey of representative pharmacies, which assesses non‐subsidised opioid prescribing. We examined the agreement between these data sources. Results: The three data sources provided consistent estimates of use over time. The correlations between different data sources were high for most opioid analgesics. There was a substantial (60%) increase in the dispensed use of opioid analgesics and a 180% increase in the dispensed use of oxycodone over the period 2002–2009. Tramadol was the most used opioid‐like medication. Conclusions: Since 2002 different data sources reveal similar trends, namely a substantial increase in the prescribing of opioid medications. With few exceptions, the conclusions derived from using any of these data sources were similar. Implications: Improved access to PBS data for relevant stakeholders could provide an efficient and cost‐effective way to monitor use of prescription opioid analgesics.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12030analgesicsopioidsoxycodoneprescribingdatabases
spellingShingle Samantha A. Hollingworth
Martyn Symons
Mohsina Khatun
Bill Loveday
Sue Ballantyne
Wayne D. Hall
Jake M. Najman
Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
analgesics
opioids
oxycodone
prescribing
databases
title Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
title_full Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
title_fullStr Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
title_short Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
title_sort prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in australia
topic analgesics
opioids
oxycodone
prescribing
databases
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12030
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthaahollingworth prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT martynsymons prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT mohsinakhatun prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT billloveday prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT sueballantyne prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT waynedhall prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia
AT jakemnajman prescribingdatabasescanbeusedtomonitortrendsinopioidanalgesicprescribinginaustralia