Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective

Aim: Understanding the Indian perspective, effectiveness, and acceptability of prepuce conservation in children with phimosis. Circumcision is performed and recommended far too often for nonphysiological phimosis. Will a less radical approach be acceptable in the subcontinent? Method: A two-arm stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B S Balaji, Tarun John K. Jacob, M S Gowri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=5;spage=2297;epage=2302;aulast=Balaji
_version_ 1818406578484674560
author B S Balaji
Tarun John K. Jacob
M S Gowri
author_facet B S Balaji
Tarun John K. Jacob
M S Gowri
author_sort B S Balaji
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Understanding the Indian perspective, effectiveness, and acceptability of prepuce conservation in children with phimosis. Circumcision is performed and recommended far too often for nonphysiological phimosis. Will a less radical approach be acceptable in the subcontinent? Method: A two-arm study with the first arm as KAP (knowledge, attitude, and practice) study (n = 502). The second arm recruited deserving boys (n = 47) with symptomatic phimosis (see inclusion criteria). Betamethasone ointment was applied twice daily over the foreskin and gently massaged to stretch the phimotic band. Those who failed were offered lateral preputioplasty or circumcision. Religious beliefs influence attitude and practice and these were looked at with subgroup analysis. Results: Most (85%) knew that circumcision was not the only treatment for phimosis. Though many parents (93%) knew the importance of foreskin cleanliness, few practiced it. The success of the steroid application was 81% (n = 38/47). Eight underwent preputioplasty. Minor discomfort as morbidity was noted. All parents were able to completely retract the foreskin of their children by the end of one month and were happy about the cosmetic result. Conclusions: KAP data on foreskin health is not available in the subcontinent, and this is a landmark study. Religious belief and community identity play a strong role in decisions related to foreskin preservation. Prepuce hygiene and knowledge about the usefulness of the foreskin is poor. The combination of medical and surgical methods of conserving the prepuce was effective. A high rate of success and the non-mutilating cosmetic result of prepuce preservation were acceptable to these parents.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:14:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c64966de6f1941e68f2474ea20b46a7b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-4863
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:14:10Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj.art-c64966de6f1941e68f2474ea20b46a7b2022-12-21T23:08:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632020-01-01952297230210.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_49_20Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspectiveB S BalajiTarun John K. JacobM S GowriAim: Understanding the Indian perspective, effectiveness, and acceptability of prepuce conservation in children with phimosis. Circumcision is performed and recommended far too often for nonphysiological phimosis. Will a less radical approach be acceptable in the subcontinent? Method: A two-arm study with the first arm as KAP (knowledge, attitude, and practice) study (n = 502). The second arm recruited deserving boys (n = 47) with symptomatic phimosis (see inclusion criteria). Betamethasone ointment was applied twice daily over the foreskin and gently massaged to stretch the phimotic band. Those who failed were offered lateral preputioplasty or circumcision. Religious beliefs influence attitude and practice and these were looked at with subgroup analysis. Results: Most (85%) knew that circumcision was not the only treatment for phimosis. Though many parents (93%) knew the importance of foreskin cleanliness, few practiced it. The success of the steroid application was 81% (n = 38/47). Eight underwent preputioplasty. Minor discomfort as morbidity was noted. All parents were able to completely retract the foreskin of their children by the end of one month and were happy about the cosmetic result. Conclusions: KAP data on foreskin health is not available in the subcontinent, and this is a landmark study. Religious belief and community identity play a strong role in decisions related to foreskin preservation. Prepuce hygiene and knowledge about the usefulness of the foreskin is poor. The combination of medical and surgical methods of conserving the prepuce was effective. A high rate of success and the non-mutilating cosmetic result of prepuce preservation were acceptable to these parents.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=5;spage=2297;epage=2302;aulast=Balajicircumcisionforeskinphimosisreligious beliefs
spellingShingle B S Balaji
Tarun John K. Jacob
M S Gowri
Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
circumcision
foreskin
phimosis
religious beliefs
title Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
title_full Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
title_fullStr Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
title_short Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
title_sort acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis an indian perspective
topic circumcision
foreskin
phimosis
religious beliefs
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=5;spage=2297;epage=2302;aulast=Balaji
work_keys_str_mv AT bsbalaji acceptabilityandoutcomesofforeskinpreservationforphimosisanindianperspective
AT tarunjohnkjacob acceptabilityandoutcomesofforeskinpreservationforphimosisanindianperspective
AT msgowri acceptabilityandoutcomesofforeskinpreservationforphimosisanindianperspective