Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students

The internationalisation of higher education generates several issues related to quality, uniformity of subjects taught across campuses and the role of differences in English-speaking ability, which may affect student learning and skills development. This study used a self-assessment survey framewor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerry Rayner, Theo Papakonstantinou, Roslyn Gleadow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1179164
_version_ 1797727449438486528
author Gerry Rayner
Theo Papakonstantinou
Roslyn Gleadow
author_facet Gerry Rayner
Theo Papakonstantinou
Roslyn Gleadow
author_sort Gerry Rayner
collection DOAJ
description The internationalisation of higher education generates several issues related to quality, uniformity of subjects taught across campuses and the role of differences in English-speaking ability, which may affect student learning and skills development. This study used a self-assessment survey framework to investigate Australian (native English speaking) and Malaysian (non-native English speaking) students’ perceptions of their writing-related competencies. These perceptions were then correlated with students’ grades for specific writing tasks at the Australian and Malaysian campuses of Monash University, a research-intensive tertiary institution. Student perceptions of six competencies were determined upon commencement and completion of a core science subject, SCI2010. Australian and Malaysian student perceptions of their abilities improved for all six, and four of the surveyed competencies, respectively. Upon commencement of the science unit, Malaysian students’ self-efficacy was higher than that of Australian students for three competencies. However, by completion, Australian students had higher self-efficacy for all six competencies, which correlated with their higher literature review grades. There was no difference in grades for the annotated bibliography assignment. These results have important implications for the delivery of university subjects across international campuses.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:59:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c663d5a3b6b14784a2ab173e171b48ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-186X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:59:53Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Education
spelling doaj.art-c663d5a3b6b14784a2ab173e171b48ed2023-09-02T05:51:34ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2016-12-013110.1080/2331186X.2016.11791641179164Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking studentsGerry Rayner0Theo Papakonstantinou1Roslyn Gleadow2Monash UniversityMonash UniversityMonash UniversityThe internationalisation of higher education generates several issues related to quality, uniformity of subjects taught across campuses and the role of differences in English-speaking ability, which may affect student learning and skills development. This study used a self-assessment survey framework to investigate Australian (native English speaking) and Malaysian (non-native English speaking) students’ perceptions of their writing-related competencies. These perceptions were then correlated with students’ grades for specific writing tasks at the Australian and Malaysian campuses of Monash University, a research-intensive tertiary institution. Student perceptions of six competencies were determined upon commencement and completion of a core science subject, SCI2010. Australian and Malaysian student perceptions of their abilities improved for all six, and four of the surveyed competencies, respectively. Upon commencement of the science unit, Malaysian students’ self-efficacy was higher than that of Australian students for three competencies. However, by completion, Australian students had higher self-efficacy for all six competencies, which correlated with their higher literature review grades. There was no difference in grades for the annotated bibliography assignment. These results have important implications for the delivery of university subjects across international campuses.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1179164demographic differencesstudent perceptionswriting skillseslcomparative assessmentpedagogy
spellingShingle Gerry Rayner
Theo Papakonstantinou
Roslyn Gleadow
Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
Cogent Education
demographic differences
student perceptions
writing skills
esl
comparative assessment
pedagogy
title Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
title_full Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
title_fullStr Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
title_short Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students
title_sort comparing the self efficacy and writing related abilities of native and non native english speaking students
topic demographic differences
student perceptions
writing skills
esl
comparative assessment
pedagogy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1179164
work_keys_str_mv AT gerryrayner comparingtheselfefficacyandwritingrelatedabilitiesofnativeandnonnativeenglishspeakingstudents
AT theopapakonstantinou comparingtheselfefficacyandwritingrelatedabilitiesofnativeandnonnativeenglishspeakingstudents
AT roslyngleadow comparingtheselfefficacyandwritingrelatedabilitiesofnativeandnonnativeenglishspeakingstudents