Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: The Cases of the Nagoya Protocol and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)
This article addresses the intertwined and contentious relationship between knowledge production and policy-making inside the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). We develop the argument that international biodiversity politics is constituted by epistemic selectivities, in which a set of favour...
Main Author: | Ulrich Brand and Alice B.M. Vadrot |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
School of Oriental and African Studies
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Law, Environment and Development Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://lead-journal.org/content/13202.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Country Representatives’ Perceptions of the Biodiversity Science-Policy Interface
by: André Derek Mader, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
A Singular Concept of Biodiversity Remains the Best Way to Address the Plural Values of Nature in Conservation Planning
by: Daniel P. Faith
Published: (2021-12-01) -
The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), up and walking
by: Lars Opgenoorth, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Institutional entrepreneurship and techniques of inclusiveness in the creation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
by: Isabelle Arpin, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Avoiding paradigm drifts in IPBES: reconciling "nature's contributions to people," biodiversity, and ecosystem services
by: Daniel P. Faith
Published: (2018-06-01)