Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania

Abstract Background Fixed-dose combinations (FDC) are medicine formulations that combine two or more ingredients in fixed ratios in a single dose form. Although advantageous in tuberculosis and malaria (efficacy, adherence, protection against resistance), only a few antibiotic FDC (FDC-AB) have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, Jan Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01238-8
_version_ 1797840815403302912
author Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed
Jan Jacobs
author_facet Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed
Jan Jacobs
author_sort Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Fixed-dose combinations (FDC) are medicine formulations that combine two or more ingredients in fixed ratios in a single dose form. Although advantageous in tuberculosis and malaria (efficacy, adherence, protection against resistance), only a few antibiotic FDC (FDC-AB) have been developed along full microbiological, pharmacological and clinical validation and safety studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) database of Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) antibiotics contains, since 2021, a list of “Not Recommended” FDC-AB (n = 103) which are rejected for use in clinical practice. Body The share of non-recommended FDC-AB in global antimicrobial use (2000–2015) was < 3% but substantially higher in middle income countries. The share increases over time, but recent data particular concerning sub-Saharan Africa are rare. Along three non-recommended FDC-AB listed in the Tanzanian National Essential Medicine List (ampicillin-cloxacillin, flucloxacillin-amoxicillin and ceftriaxone-sulbactam) we discuss the concerns and reasons behind use of these products. Non-recommended FDC-AB have poor rationale (ratios of both ingredients), lack evidence of efficacy (pharmacological, microbiological and clinical), have difficulties in dosing (underdosing of the single ingredients, absence of pediatric dosing) and risks of safety (additive toxicity). They are expected to fuel antimicrobial resistance (unnecessary broad spectrum coverage) and are incompatible with antimicrobial stewardship. The specific context of low- and middle-income countries contributes to their increased use: at the side of prescriber and supplier are the lack of diagnostics, poor training in antibiotic prescribing, patients’ preferences, role-model of senior prescribers and pharmaceutical promotion. International market mechanisms include economic motivation for development, branding and promotion, poor access to the single antibiotic forms and weak national regulatory capacity. Conclusion and implications There is an urgent need for monitoring consumption of non-recommended FDC-AB in low- and middle-income countries, particular in Sub-Saharan Africa. A multinational and multisectoral antimicrobial stewardship strategy is needed in order to abolish the use of non-recommended FDC-AB.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:20:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c66d33d3294647b7b9039aef23a92f92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:20:49Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj.art-c66d33d3294647b7b9039aef23a92f922023-04-23T11:28:36ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942023-04-0112111010.1186/s13756-023-01238-8Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of TanzaniaKlaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed0Jan Jacobs1Haydom Lutheran HospitalDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine AntwerpAbstract Background Fixed-dose combinations (FDC) are medicine formulations that combine two or more ingredients in fixed ratios in a single dose form. Although advantageous in tuberculosis and malaria (efficacy, adherence, protection against resistance), only a few antibiotic FDC (FDC-AB) have been developed along full microbiological, pharmacological and clinical validation and safety studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) database of Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) antibiotics contains, since 2021, a list of “Not Recommended” FDC-AB (n = 103) which are rejected for use in clinical practice. Body The share of non-recommended FDC-AB in global antimicrobial use (2000–2015) was < 3% but substantially higher in middle income countries. The share increases over time, but recent data particular concerning sub-Saharan Africa are rare. Along three non-recommended FDC-AB listed in the Tanzanian National Essential Medicine List (ampicillin-cloxacillin, flucloxacillin-amoxicillin and ceftriaxone-sulbactam) we discuss the concerns and reasons behind use of these products. Non-recommended FDC-AB have poor rationale (ratios of both ingredients), lack evidence of efficacy (pharmacological, microbiological and clinical), have difficulties in dosing (underdosing of the single ingredients, absence of pediatric dosing) and risks of safety (additive toxicity). They are expected to fuel antimicrobial resistance (unnecessary broad spectrum coverage) and are incompatible with antimicrobial stewardship. The specific context of low- and middle-income countries contributes to their increased use: at the side of prescriber and supplier are the lack of diagnostics, poor training in antibiotic prescribing, patients’ preferences, role-model of senior prescribers and pharmaceutical promotion. International market mechanisms include economic motivation for development, branding and promotion, poor access to the single antibiotic forms and weak national regulatory capacity. Conclusion and implications There is an urgent need for monitoring consumption of non-recommended FDC-AB in low- and middle-income countries, particular in Sub-Saharan Africa. A multinational and multisectoral antimicrobial stewardship strategy is needed in order to abolish the use of non-recommended FDC-AB.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01238-8Fixed-dose combinations (FDC)AntibioticsWHO AWaRe classificationLow- and middle-income countriesAntimicrobial stewardshipPrescriber
spellingShingle Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed
Jan Jacobs
Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Fixed-dose combinations (FDC)
Antibiotics
WHO AWaRe classification
Low- and middle-income countries
Antimicrobial stewardship
Prescriber
title Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
title_full Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
title_fullStr Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
title_short Not recommended fixed-dose antibiotic combinations in low- and middle-income countries – the example of Tanzania
title_sort not recommended fixed dose antibiotic combinations in low and middle income countries the example of tanzania
topic Fixed-dose combinations (FDC)
Antibiotics
WHO AWaRe classification
Low- and middle-income countries
Antimicrobial stewardship
Prescriber
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01238-8
work_keys_str_mv AT klaskevliegenthartjongbloed notrecommendedfixeddoseantibioticcombinationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriestheexampleoftanzania
AT janjacobs notrecommendedfixeddoseantibioticcombinationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriestheexampleoftanzania