The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigbjørn Berentsen, Bruno Fattizzo, Wilma Barcellini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509/full
_version_ 1797840594593120256
author Sigbjørn Berentsen
Bruno Fattizzo
Wilma Barcellini
author_facet Sigbjørn Berentsen
Bruno Fattizzo
Wilma Barcellini
author_sort Sigbjørn Berentsen
collection DOAJ
description Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:17:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c68af42595fa4d3e9c8edb0bd07b822e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:17:24Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-c68af42595fa4d3e9c8edb0bd07b822e2023-04-24T04:24:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242023-04-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.11805091180509The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?Sigbjørn Berentsen0Bruno Fattizzo1Wilma Barcellini2Department of Research and Innovation, Haugesund Hospital, Helse Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, NorwayFondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, and Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyFondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyAutoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509/fullclinical trialscomplement inhibitorscold agglutinin diseasecorticosteroidsimmune suppressionrituximab
spellingShingle Sigbjørn Berentsen
Bruno Fattizzo
Wilma Barcellini
The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
Frontiers in Immunology
clinical trials
complement inhibitors
cold agglutinin disease
corticosteroids
immune suppression
rituximab
title The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_full The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_fullStr The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_full_unstemmed The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_short The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_sort choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia how to pick from the basket
topic clinical trials
complement inhibitors
cold agglutinin disease
corticosteroids
immune suppression
rituximab
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sigbjørnberentsen thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT brunofattizzo thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT wilmabarcellini thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT sigbjørnberentsen choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT brunofattizzo choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT wilmabarcellini choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket