Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the measles epidemiological surveillance system, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: This was a descriptive evaluation of the quality (duplicity; completeness; consistency), timeliness and usefulness attributed, classified as ex...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ministério da Saúde do Brasil
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-96222023000300307&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1827631662729527296 |
---|---|
author | Cinthia Regina Albuquerque de Souza Lygia Carmen de Moraes Vanderlei Paulo Germano de Frias |
author_facet | Cinthia Regina Albuquerque de Souza Lygia Carmen de Moraes Vanderlei Paulo Germano de Frias |
author_sort | Cinthia Regina Albuquerque de Souza |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective: To evaluate the measles epidemiological surveillance system, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: This was a descriptive evaluation of the quality (duplicity; completeness; consistency), timeliness and usefulness attributed, classified as excellent ≥ 90.0%, regular ≥ 70.0% and < 90.0%, and poor (< 70.0%). Data from the Notifiable Health Conditions Information System and Laboratory Environment Management System were used, before (03/11/2018-03/10/2020) and during (03/11/2020-03/10/2022) the pandemic. Results: 1,548 suspected measles cases were registered (1,469 before and 79 during the pandemic). In the two periods studied, there were 11 and 1 duplicate records, average completeness in filling out the variables was 99.2% and 95.7%, while average consistency was 96.7% and 97.5%, respectively. Timeliness (receipt of samples, 16.2% and 33.0%. Release of results, 1.3% and 1.3%) and usefulness (43.5% and 24.4%) were poor. Conclusion: Quality was classified as excellent in the periods studied, timeliness and usefulness were classified as poor, signaling non-compliance with the purpose of the system. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T14:25:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c6a21329d6324f3bb7865c1decb708dd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2237-9622 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T14:25:10Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | Ministério da Saúde do Brasil |
record_format | Article |
series | Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde |
spelling | doaj.art-c6a21329d6324f3bb7865c1decb708dd2023-11-28T07:47:15ZengMinistério da Saúde do BrasilEpidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde2237-96222023-11-0132310.1590/s2237-96222023000300008.enMeasles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluationCinthia Regina Albuquerque de Souzahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-6348Lygia Carmen de Moraes Vanderleihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3610-3699Paulo Germano de Friashttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-8898Abstract Objective: To evaluate the measles epidemiological surveillance system, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: This was a descriptive evaluation of the quality (duplicity; completeness; consistency), timeliness and usefulness attributed, classified as excellent ≥ 90.0%, regular ≥ 70.0% and < 90.0%, and poor (< 70.0%). Data from the Notifiable Health Conditions Information System and Laboratory Environment Management System were used, before (03/11/2018-03/10/2020) and during (03/11/2020-03/10/2022) the pandemic. Results: 1,548 suspected measles cases were registered (1,469 before and 79 during the pandemic). In the two periods studied, there were 11 and 1 duplicate records, average completeness in filling out the variables was 99.2% and 95.7%, while average consistency was 96.7% and 97.5%, respectively. Timeliness (receipt of samples, 16.2% and 33.0%. Release of results, 1.3% and 1.3%) and usefulness (43.5% and 24.4%) were poor. Conclusion: Quality was classified as excellent in the periods studied, timeliness and usefulness were classified as poor, signaling non-compliance with the purpose of the system.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-96222023000300307&lng=en&tlng=enHealth EvaluationEpidemiological MonitoringMeaslesCOVID-19Communicable DiseasesHealth Information System |
spellingShingle | Cinthia Regina Albuquerque de Souza Lygia Carmen de Moraes Vanderlei Paulo Germano de Frias Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde Health Evaluation Epidemiological Monitoring Measles COVID-19 Communicable Diseases Health Information System |
title | Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation |
title_full | Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation |
title_fullStr | Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation |
title_short | Measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2018-2022: a descriptive evaluation |
title_sort | measles epidemiological surveillance system before and during the covid 19 pandemic in pernambuco brazil 2018 2022 a descriptive evaluation |
topic | Health Evaluation Epidemiological Monitoring Measles COVID-19 Communicable Diseases Health Information System |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-96222023000300307&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cinthiareginaalbuquerquedesouza measlesepidemiologicalsurveillancesystembeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicinpernambucobrazil20182022adescriptiveevaluation AT lygiacarmendemoraesvanderlei measlesepidemiologicalsurveillancesystembeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicinpernambucobrazil20182022adescriptiveevaluation AT paulogermanodefrias measlesepidemiologicalsurveillancesystembeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicinpernambucobrazil20182022adescriptiveevaluation |