Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures

Abraham Kuyper wanted his fellow countrymen to accept biblically informed academic output as scientific and therefore authoritative. If Kuyper’s plans were to come to fruition, he would have to state the case for a Christian science in a way that made sense to an audience enamoured with empirical sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolaas J. Grönum, Fika Janse van Rensburg
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2014-12-01
Series:In die Skriflig
Subjects:
Online Access:https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/1786
_version_ 1818007452492234752
author Nicolaas J. Grönum
Fika Janse van Rensburg
author_facet Nicolaas J. Grönum
Fika Janse van Rensburg
author_sort Nicolaas J. Grönum
collection DOAJ
description Abraham Kuyper wanted his fellow countrymen to accept biblically informed academic output as scientific and therefore authoritative. If Kuyper’s plans were to come to fruition, he would have to state the case for a Christian science in a way that made sense to an audience enamoured with empirical science. Kuyper did this when he adopted foundationalism as epistemological thought structure, just like empirical scientists did. He did also differ from empirical science in the sense that he took faith as the foundation for his epistemological thought structure. Although Kuyper’s choice for faith as foundation gave him the opportunity to introduce the Bible to scientific endeavour, his acceptance of foundationalism resulted in him dehumanising knowledge the same way empiricist scientist’s did. Abraham Kuyper se Christelike en empiriese wetenskappe - verskillend, dog dieselfde:‘n Ondersoek na epistemologiede denkstrukture. Abraham Kuyper wou dat sy tydgenote bybels-gefundeerde akademiese arbeid as wetenskaplike arbeid aanvaar. Ten einde dit tebewerkstellig moes Kuyper sy saak vir ’n Christen-wetenskap so stel dat dit sin kon maak vir sy tydgenote wat sterk onder die invloed van die waarde van empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening was. Kuyper het dit gedoen deur, soos die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening, ook van ’n foundationalist epistemologiese denkstruktuur gebruik te maak. Hy het wel van die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening verskil deur geloof as fondasie vir sy epistemologiese denkstruktuurte neem. Hoewel Kuyper se aandrang op geloof as fondasie hom die geleentheid gegee het om die Bybel by wetenskapsbeoefening te betrek, het sy aanvaarding van foundationalism tot gevolg gehad dat hy kennis op dieselfde wyse as die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening dehumaniseer.   [Full text article to follow]
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:15:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6ae9a5a944d40dcb6c9cc3190dd0fb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1018-6441
2305-0853
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:15:44Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series In die Skriflig
spelling doaj.art-c6ae9a5a944d40dcb6c9cc3190dd0fb52022-12-22T02:10:23ZafrAOSISIn die Skriflig1018-64412305-08532014-12-01481e1e810.4102/ids.v48i1.17861860Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structuresNicolaas J. Grönum0Fika Janse van Rensburg1University of Pretoria, Faculty of Theology, Department Science of Religion and MissiologyFaculty of Theology, North-West University, Potchefstroom CampusAbraham Kuyper wanted his fellow countrymen to accept biblically informed academic output as scientific and therefore authoritative. If Kuyper’s plans were to come to fruition, he would have to state the case for a Christian science in a way that made sense to an audience enamoured with empirical science. Kuyper did this when he adopted foundationalism as epistemological thought structure, just like empirical scientists did. He did also differ from empirical science in the sense that he took faith as the foundation for his epistemological thought structure. Although Kuyper’s choice for faith as foundation gave him the opportunity to introduce the Bible to scientific endeavour, his acceptance of foundationalism resulted in him dehumanising knowledge the same way empiricist scientist’s did. Abraham Kuyper se Christelike en empiriese wetenskappe - verskillend, dog dieselfde:‘n Ondersoek na epistemologiede denkstrukture. Abraham Kuyper wou dat sy tydgenote bybels-gefundeerde akademiese arbeid as wetenskaplike arbeid aanvaar. Ten einde dit tebewerkstellig moes Kuyper sy saak vir ’n Christen-wetenskap so stel dat dit sin kon maak vir sy tydgenote wat sterk onder die invloed van die waarde van empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening was. Kuyper het dit gedoen deur, soos die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening, ook van ’n foundationalist epistemologiese denkstruktuur gebruik te maak. Hy het wel van die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening verskil deur geloof as fondasie vir sy epistemologiese denkstruktuurte neem. Hoewel Kuyper se aandrang op geloof as fondasie hom die geleentheid gegee het om die Bybel by wetenskapsbeoefening te betrek, het sy aanvaarding van foundationalism tot gevolg gehad dat hy kennis op dieselfde wyse as die empiriese wetenskapsbeoefening dehumaniseer.   [Full text article to follow]https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/1786Worldview, Epistemology, Scientific method
spellingShingle Nicolaas J. Grönum
Fika Janse van Rensburg
Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
In die Skriflig
Worldview, Epistemology, Scientific method
title Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
title_full Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
title_fullStr Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
title_full_unstemmed Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
title_short Abraham Kuyper’s Christian science and empirical science – different yet similar: An investigation into epistemological structures
title_sort abraham kuyper s christian science and empirical science different yet similar an investigation into epistemological structures
topic Worldview, Epistemology, Scientific method
url https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/1786
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaasjgronum abrahamkuyperschristianscienceandempiricalsciencedifferentyetsimilaraninvestigationintoepistemologicalstructures
AT fikajansevanrensburg abrahamkuyperschristianscienceandempiricalsciencedifferentyetsimilaraninvestigationintoepistemologicalstructures