Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s

This paper deals with the historical and cultural heritage of an important industrial centre of the Urals, the city of Zlatoust, namely, its constructivist architecture which emerged during the age of the first five-year plans, and which remained out of researchers’ view. The specifics of the urban...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Konstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ural Federal University Press 2022-06-01
Series:Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/5992
_version_ 1818156046245429248
author Konstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov
author_facet Konstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov
author_sort Konstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov
collection DOAJ
description This paper deals with the historical and cultural heritage of an important industrial centre of the Urals, the city of Zlatoust, namely, its constructivist architecture which emerged during the age of the first five-year plans, and which remained out of researchers’ view. The specifics of the urban process of the industrialisation age in older industrial settlements of the Urals was defined by the deployment of new constructivist buildings in the existing dense urban environment and in the proximity to production sites. The author describes two key locations of new construction in detail. In the old centre, around the Square of the Third International and along Lenin Street, the old dominants were demolished in the early 1930s (cathedral, Lutheran church) and replaced by new ones (club, bank, fire station, 4-storey residential buildings). In the northern part of the town, the residential zone was developed by the Zlatoust Steel Mill, which was heavily reconstructed in the early 1930s, its settlement had a peculiar planning (terraces on the steep slope of a mountain). Drawing upon archival sources, the author traces the process of planning and construction of key residential and public buildings of Zlatoust (factory kitchen, public bath), shows the peculiarities of urban development in the industrial settlement in the Urals, and outlines the projects of particular structures as well as the course of construction. In the second half of the 1930s, the urban development of Zlatoust was stagnating, and most projects from this period (House of Specialists, House of the Soviets) remained on paper. The author specially describes the housing policy of the Zlatoust Steel Mill. Also, he demonstrates that Zlatoust was a leader among the old (pre-revolutionary) industrial settlements in terms of construction, however, due to the outpacing population growth, administrative changes in the second half of the 1930s and the complex natural landscape, the social infrastructure of the city remained underdeveloped. That, in turn, provoked an acute shortage of housing and communal crises during the Great Patriotic War. The constructivist heritage of Zlatoust was incapable of becoming a cultural symbol of the city in the second half of the twentieth century, and even suffered major losses associated with both the expansion of industrial sites and the outflow of the population from the old part of the settlement.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:52:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6c18fe8497b4ab8b2c4fcabdbfc51cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-2283
2587-6929
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:52:04Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Ural Federal University Press
record_format Article
series Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
spelling doaj.art-c6c18fe8497b4ab8b2c4fcabdbfc51cc2022-12-22T01:01:25ZrusUral Federal University PressИзвестия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки2227-22832587-69292022-06-0124210.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.0224457Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930sKonstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov01) Институт истории и археологии УрО РАН, Екатеринбург 2) Уральский федеральный университет, ЕкатеринбургThis paper deals with the historical and cultural heritage of an important industrial centre of the Urals, the city of Zlatoust, namely, its constructivist architecture which emerged during the age of the first five-year plans, and which remained out of researchers’ view. The specifics of the urban process of the industrialisation age in older industrial settlements of the Urals was defined by the deployment of new constructivist buildings in the existing dense urban environment and in the proximity to production sites. The author describes two key locations of new construction in detail. In the old centre, around the Square of the Third International and along Lenin Street, the old dominants were demolished in the early 1930s (cathedral, Lutheran church) and replaced by new ones (club, bank, fire station, 4-storey residential buildings). In the northern part of the town, the residential zone was developed by the Zlatoust Steel Mill, which was heavily reconstructed in the early 1930s, its settlement had a peculiar planning (terraces on the steep slope of a mountain). Drawing upon archival sources, the author traces the process of planning and construction of key residential and public buildings of Zlatoust (factory kitchen, public bath), shows the peculiarities of urban development in the industrial settlement in the Urals, and outlines the projects of particular structures as well as the course of construction. In the second half of the 1930s, the urban development of Zlatoust was stagnating, and most projects from this period (House of Specialists, House of the Soviets) remained on paper. The author specially describes the housing policy of the Zlatoust Steel Mill. Also, he demonstrates that Zlatoust was a leader among the old (pre-revolutionary) industrial settlements in terms of construction, however, due to the outpacing population growth, administrative changes in the second half of the 1930s and the complex natural landscape, the social infrastructure of the city remained underdeveloped. That, in turn, provoked an acute shortage of housing and communal crises during the Great Patriotic War. The constructivist heritage of Zlatoust was incapable of becoming a cultural symbol of the city in the second half of the twentieth century, and even suffered major losses associated with both the expansion of industrial sites and the outflow of the population from the old part of the settlement.https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/5992конструктивизмзлатоустградостроительствоистория архитектурыистория ураласоциалистический городизучение культурного наследия
spellingShingle Konstantin Dmitrievich Bugrov
Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
конструктивизм
златоуст
градостроительство
история архитектуры
история урала
социалистический город
изучение культурного наследия
title Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
title_full Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
title_fullStr Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
title_full_unstemmed Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
title_short Constructivist Architecture of Zlatoust: The Urban Heritage of the 1920s–1930s
title_sort constructivist architecture of zlatoust the urban heritage of the 1920s 1930s
topic конструктивизм
златоуст
градостроительство
история архитектуры
история урала
социалистический город
изучение культурного наследия
url https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/5992
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantindmitrievichbugrov constructivistarchitectureofzlatousttheurbanheritageofthe1920s1930s