Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy

Abstract In recent years, the concept of science diplomacy has gained remarkable ground in public policy. Calling for closer cooperation between actors from science and foreign policy, it is often being promulgated as a hitherto neglected catalyst for international understanding and global change. O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Rungius, Tim Flink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2020-09-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
_version_ 1819122620480618496
author Charlotte Rungius
Tim Flink
author_facet Charlotte Rungius
Tim Flink
author_sort Charlotte Rungius
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In recent years, the concept of science diplomacy has gained remarkable ground in public policy. Calling for closer cooperation between actors from science and foreign policy, it is often being promulgated as a hitherto neglected catalyst for international understanding and global change. On what grounds science diplomacy entertains these high hopes, however, has remained unclear, and—as a blind spot—unaddressed in a discourse mostly shaped by policy practitioners. Recognizing that the discourse on science diplomacy is still unspecific about how its means and ends should fit together and be comprehended, we reconstruct the concept and its discourse as a materialization of actors’ interpretative schemas and shared assumptions about the social world they constantly need to make sense of. Science diplomacy is presented as a panacea against looming threats and grand challenges in a world facing deterioration. The prerequisite for such a solutionistic narrative is a simplified portrait of diplomacy in need of help from science that—romanticized in this discourse—bears but positive properties and exerts rationalizing, collaborative and even pacifying effects on a generic international community in its collective efforts to tackle global challenges. We conclude that these interpretative schemas that idealize and mythify science as overall collaborative, rationalizing and complexity-reducing are problematic. First, because the discourse misconceives ideals and norms for real and will therefore disappoint social expectations, and second, because science is likely to be instrumentalised for political purposes.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:55:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6c1c891dd464f8093b10ce0e05d6ee1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:55:21Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-c6c1c891dd464f8093b10ce0e05d6ee12022-12-21T18:34:59ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922020-09-017111010.1057/s41599-020-00585-wRomancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacyCharlotte Rungius0Tim Flink1German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science StudiesGerman Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies; Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinAbstract In recent years, the concept of science diplomacy has gained remarkable ground in public policy. Calling for closer cooperation between actors from science and foreign policy, it is often being promulgated as a hitherto neglected catalyst for international understanding and global change. On what grounds science diplomacy entertains these high hopes, however, has remained unclear, and—as a blind spot—unaddressed in a discourse mostly shaped by policy practitioners. Recognizing that the discourse on science diplomacy is still unspecific about how its means and ends should fit together and be comprehended, we reconstruct the concept and its discourse as a materialization of actors’ interpretative schemas and shared assumptions about the social world they constantly need to make sense of. Science diplomacy is presented as a panacea against looming threats and grand challenges in a world facing deterioration. The prerequisite for such a solutionistic narrative is a simplified portrait of diplomacy in need of help from science that—romanticized in this discourse—bears but positive properties and exerts rationalizing, collaborative and even pacifying effects on a generic international community in its collective efforts to tackle global challenges. We conclude that these interpretative schemas that idealize and mythify science as overall collaborative, rationalizing and complexity-reducing are problematic. First, because the discourse misconceives ideals and norms for real and will therefore disappoint social expectations, and second, because science is likely to be instrumentalised for political purposes.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
spellingShingle Charlotte Rungius
Tim Flink
Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
title_full Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
title_fullStr Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
title_full_unstemmed Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
title_short Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
title_sort romancing science for global solutions on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
work_keys_str_mv AT charlotterungius romancingscienceforglobalsolutionsonnarrativesandinterpretativeschemasofsciencediplomacy
AT timflink romancingscienceforglobalsolutionsonnarrativesandinterpretativeschemasofsciencediplomacy