Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of the Stanford Type B traumatic aortic dissection (TAD) with non-traumatic aortic dissection (NTAD), and assess better management for TAD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qingwei Gang, Yu Lun, Liwei Pang, Xinyang Li, Bingchen Hou, Shijie Xin, Jian Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7535
_version_ 1797380570850787328
author Qingwei Gang
Yu Lun
Liwei Pang
Xinyang Li
Bingchen Hou
Shijie Xin
Jian Zhang
author_facet Qingwei Gang
Yu Lun
Liwei Pang
Xinyang Li
Bingchen Hou
Shijie Xin
Jian Zhang
author_sort Qingwei Gang
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of the Stanford Type B traumatic aortic dissection (TAD) with non-traumatic aortic dissection (NTAD), and assess better management for TAD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection at The First Hospital of China Medical University between 2014 and 2022. The patients were divided into TAD and NTAD groups based on whether they had a history of acute trauma. This study ultimately included 65 patients with TAD and 288 with NTAD. We assessed and compared the baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators, imaging features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results between the groups. Results: The TAD group was younger compared to the NTAD group (50.00 [IQR40.00–59.00] vs. 55.00 [IQR 47.00–61.00] years, <i>p</i> = 0.020). A lower percentage of the TAD group had a history of hypertension (20% vs. 71.18%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The length of aortic dissection was shorter in the TAD group compared to the NTAD group (30.00 [IQR 22.00–40.00] vs. 344.00 [IQR 237.25–400.00] mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). All patients with TAD underwent TEVAR following the same strategy as NTAD. The mean preoperative duration was 7.00 (IQR 2.00–14.00) days in the TAD group and 11.00 (IQR 8.00–15.00) days in the NTAD group (<i>p <</i> 0.001). TAD showed fewer complications after TEVAR in mid-to-long-term follow-up. Conclusions: TAD is distinct from NTAD. TAD typically presents with more localized lesions than NTAD, and the patients experience a shorter preoperative duration and a better mid-to-long-term outcome.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:40:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6c6b2d0b5bd45bea7f60525754e85ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:40:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c6c6b2d0b5bd45bea7f60525754e85ab2023-12-22T14:16:54ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-12-011224753510.3390/jcm12247535Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective StudyQingwei Gang0Yu Lun1Liwei Pang2Xinyang Li3Bingchen Hou4Shijie Xin5Jian Zhang6Department of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, ChinaBackground: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of the Stanford Type B traumatic aortic dissection (TAD) with non-traumatic aortic dissection (NTAD), and assess better management for TAD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection at The First Hospital of China Medical University between 2014 and 2022. The patients were divided into TAD and NTAD groups based on whether they had a history of acute trauma. This study ultimately included 65 patients with TAD and 288 with NTAD. We assessed and compared the baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators, imaging features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results between the groups. Results: The TAD group was younger compared to the NTAD group (50.00 [IQR40.00–59.00] vs. 55.00 [IQR 47.00–61.00] years, <i>p</i> = 0.020). A lower percentage of the TAD group had a history of hypertension (20% vs. 71.18%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The length of aortic dissection was shorter in the TAD group compared to the NTAD group (30.00 [IQR 22.00–40.00] vs. 344.00 [IQR 237.25–400.00] mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). All patients with TAD underwent TEVAR following the same strategy as NTAD. The mean preoperative duration was 7.00 (IQR 2.00–14.00) days in the TAD group and 11.00 (IQR 8.00–15.00) days in the NTAD group (<i>p <</i> 0.001). TAD showed fewer complications after TEVAR in mid-to-long-term follow-up. Conclusions: TAD is distinct from NTAD. TAD typically presents with more localized lesions than NTAD, and the patients experience a shorter preoperative duration and a better mid-to-long-term outcome.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7535aortic dissectiontraumaticstanford type Bblunt aortic injurythoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
spellingShingle Qingwei Gang
Yu Lun
Liwei Pang
Xinyang Li
Bingchen Hou
Shijie Xin
Jian Zhang
Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
aortic dissection
traumatic
stanford type B
blunt aortic injury
thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
title Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_short Traumatic Aortic Dissection as a Unique Clinical Entity: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_sort traumatic aortic dissection as a unique clinical entity a single center retrospective study
topic aortic dissection
traumatic
stanford type B
blunt aortic injury
thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7535
work_keys_str_mv AT qingweigang traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT yulun traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liweipang traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT xinyangli traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT bingchenhou traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT shijiexin traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT jianzhang traumaticaorticdissectionasauniqueclinicalentityasinglecenterretrospectivestudy