Quantifying empirical support for theories of consciousness: a tentative methodological framework
Understanding consciousness is central to understanding human nature. We have competing theories of consciousness. In interdisciplinary consciousness studies most believe that consciousness can be naturalized (i.e., consciousness depends in some substantial way on processes in — or states of — the b...
Main Author: | Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1341430/full |
Similar Items
-
Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism
by: Igor eDouven, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Abduction, Bayesianism and Best Explanations in Physics
by: Andrés Rivadulla
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Does consciousness even appear unified?
by: Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Is Higher-Order Misrepresentation Empirically Plausible? An Argument From Corruption
by: Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
The Supremacy of IBE over Bayesian Conditionalization
by: Seungbae Park
Published: (2023-04-01)