The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery

Flow batteries are promising for large‐scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low‐cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all‐vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nico Mans, Henning M. Krieg, Derik J. van der Westhuizen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2024-03-01
Series:Advanced Energy & Sustainability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202300238
_version_ 1797270099746357248
author Nico Mans
Henning M. Krieg
Derik J. van der Westhuizen
author_facet Nico Mans
Henning M. Krieg
Derik J. van der Westhuizen
author_sort Nico Mans
collection DOAJ
description Flow batteries are promising for large‐scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low‐cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all‐vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H2SO4) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 m FeCl2, 1.4 m CrCl3, 5.0 mm Bi2O3 in 1.0 m HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L−1), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h−1) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 m FeCl2, 1.0 m CrCl3 in 3.0 m HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 m HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 m H2SO4 (1.6% h−1) compared to 1.0 m HCl (0.3% h−1) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:58:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6d52c4ba98046e19bec854c378df799
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2699-9412
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:58:53Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley-VCH
record_format Article
series Advanced Energy & Sustainability Research
spelling doaj.art-c6d52c4ba98046e19bec854c378df7992024-03-07T15:36:01ZengWiley-VCHAdvanced Energy & Sustainability Research2699-94122024-03-0153n/an/a10.1002/aesr.202300238The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow BatteryNico Mans0Henning M. Krieg1Derik J. van der Westhuizen2Hydrometallurgy Group Chemical Resource Beneficiation North‐West University Potchefstroom 2520 South AfricaHydrometallurgy Group Chemical Resource Beneficiation North‐West University Potchefstroom 2520 South AfricaHydrometallurgy Group Chemical Resource Beneficiation North‐West University Potchefstroom 2520 South AfricaFlow batteries are promising for large‐scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low‐cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all‐vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H2SO4) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 m FeCl2, 1.4 m CrCl3, 5.0 mm Bi2O3 in 1.0 m HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L−1), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h−1) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 m FeCl2, 1.0 m CrCl3 in 3.0 m HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 m HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 m H2SO4 (1.6% h−1) compared to 1.0 m HCl (0.3% h−1) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202300238capacity decayefficiencyelectrolyte compositionsiron–chromium redox flow batteriessingle cell performancestorage capacity
spellingShingle Nico Mans
Henning M. Krieg
Derik J. van der Westhuizen
The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
Advanced Energy & Sustainability Research
capacity decay
efficiency
electrolyte compositions
iron–chromium redox flow batteries
single cell performance
storage capacity
title The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
title_full The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
title_fullStr The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
title_short The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
title_sort effect of electrolyte composition on the performance of a single cell iron chromium flow battery
topic capacity decay
efficiency
electrolyte compositions
iron–chromium redox flow batteries
single cell performance
storage capacity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202300238
work_keys_str_mv AT nicomans theeffectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery
AT henningmkrieg theeffectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery
AT derikjvanderwesthuizen theeffectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery
AT nicomans effectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery
AT henningmkrieg effectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery
AT derikjvanderwesthuizen effectofelectrolytecompositionontheperformanceofasinglecellironchromiumflowbattery