Biologics for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis: An Australian cost-utility analysisCapsule Summary
Background: Biologics are a good therapeutic option for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis; however, they come with significant cost to the health care system. Objective: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of outpatient biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinum...
Main Authors: | Helen Y. Sun, BSc(Med)Hons, Elena Keller, MHEcon, Harish Suresh, BAct(Co-op), Deshan F. Sebaratnam, FACD |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-12-01
|
Series: | JAAD International |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328721000456 |
Similar Items
-
Evaluating the impact of new anticoagulants in the hospital setting
by: Braidy N, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01) -
A real-world economic analysis of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy: results of the CANOVA observational longitudinal study
by: Emanuela Zagni, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Cost-consequence analysis of tocilizumab versus adalimumab and etanercept among rheumatoid arthritis patients in Saudi Arabia: a single-center study
by: Areej S. Albahdal, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab for treating plaque psoriasis in children and young people: systematic review and economic evaluation
by: Ana Duarte, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Cost per responder of adalimumab biosimilars versus methotrexate in patients with psoriasis: a real-life experience
by: Martina Maurelli, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)