Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial

Abstract Background Whole-body vibration training (WBV) performed on a vibration platform can significantly improve physical performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It has been suggested that an important mechanism of this improvement is based on an improvement in balance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rainer Gloeckl, Tessa Schneeberger, Daniela Leitl, Tobias Reinold, Christoph Nell, Inga Jarosch, Klaus Kenn, Andreas R. Koczulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01688-x
_version_ 1818403095149805568
author Rainer Gloeckl
Tessa Schneeberger
Daniela Leitl
Tobias Reinold
Christoph Nell
Inga Jarosch
Klaus Kenn
Andreas R. Koczulla
author_facet Rainer Gloeckl
Tessa Schneeberger
Daniela Leitl
Tobias Reinold
Christoph Nell
Inga Jarosch
Klaus Kenn
Andreas R. Koczulla
author_sort Rainer Gloeckl
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Whole-body vibration training (WBV) performed on a vibration platform can significantly improve physical performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It has been suggested that an important mechanism of this improvement is based on an improvement in balance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of WBV compared to conventional balance training. Methods 48 patients with severe COPD (FEV1: 37 ± 7%predicted) and low exercise performance (6 min walk distance (6MWD): 55 ± 10%predicted) were included in this randomized controlled trial during a 3 week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. All patients completed a standardized endurance and strength training program. Additionally, patients performed 4 different balance exercises 3x/week for 2 sets of 1 min each, either on a vibration platform (Galileo) at varying frequencies (5–26 Hz) (WBV) or on a conventional balance board (BAL). The primary outcome parameter was the change in balance performance during a semi tandem stance with closed eyes assessed on a force measurement platform. Muscular power during a countermovement jump, the 6MWD, and 4 m gait speed test (4MGST) were secondary outcomes. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analyses. Results Static balance performance improved significantly more (p = 0.032) in favor of WBV (path length during semi-tandem stand: − 168 ± 231 mm vs. + 1 ± 234 mm). Muscular power also increased significantly more (p = 0.001) in the WBV group (+ 2.3 ± 2.5 W/kg vs. − 0.1 ± 2.0 W/kg). 6MWD improved to a similar extent in both groups (WBV: 48 ± 46 m, p < 0.001 vs. BAL: 38 ± 32 m; p < 0.001) whereas the 4MGST increased significantly only in the WBV-group (0.08 ± 0.14 m/s2, p = 0.018 vs. 0.01 ± 0.11 m/s2, p = 0.71). Conclusions WBV can improve balance performance and muscular power significantly more compared to conventional balance training. Trial registration: Clinical-Trials registration number: NCT03157986; date of registration: May 17, 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT03157986&cntry=&state=&city=&dist  =
first_indexed 2024-12-14T08:18:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6dc6d8fb4b743bb9c5fe095cc90362f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1465-993X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T08:18:48Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj.art-c6dc6d8fb4b743bb9c5fe095cc90362f2022-12-21T23:09:51ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-993X2021-05-0122111010.1186/s12931-021-01688-xWhole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trialRainer Gloeckl0Tessa Schneeberger1Daniela Leitl2Tobias Reinold3Christoph Nell4Inga Jarosch5Klaus Kenn6Andreas R. Koczulla7Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchDepartment of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchDepartment of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Philipps University of MarburgDepartment of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchDepartment of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchDepartment of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, German Center for Lung ResearchAbstract Background Whole-body vibration training (WBV) performed on a vibration platform can significantly improve physical performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It has been suggested that an important mechanism of this improvement is based on an improvement in balance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of WBV compared to conventional balance training. Methods 48 patients with severe COPD (FEV1: 37 ± 7%predicted) and low exercise performance (6 min walk distance (6MWD): 55 ± 10%predicted) were included in this randomized controlled trial during a 3 week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. All patients completed a standardized endurance and strength training program. Additionally, patients performed 4 different balance exercises 3x/week for 2 sets of 1 min each, either on a vibration platform (Galileo) at varying frequencies (5–26 Hz) (WBV) or on a conventional balance board (BAL). The primary outcome parameter was the change in balance performance during a semi tandem stance with closed eyes assessed on a force measurement platform. Muscular power during a countermovement jump, the 6MWD, and 4 m gait speed test (4MGST) were secondary outcomes. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analyses. Results Static balance performance improved significantly more (p = 0.032) in favor of WBV (path length during semi-tandem stand: − 168 ± 231 mm vs. + 1 ± 234 mm). Muscular power also increased significantly more (p = 0.001) in the WBV group (+ 2.3 ± 2.5 W/kg vs. − 0.1 ± 2.0 W/kg). 6MWD improved to a similar extent in both groups (WBV: 48 ± 46 m, p < 0.001 vs. BAL: 38 ± 32 m; p < 0.001) whereas the 4MGST increased significantly only in the WBV-group (0.08 ± 0.14 m/s2, p = 0.018 vs. 0.01 ± 0.11 m/s2, p = 0.71). Conclusions WBV can improve balance performance and muscular power significantly more compared to conventional balance training. Trial registration: Clinical-Trials registration number: NCT03157986; date of registration: May 17, 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT03157986&cntry=&state=&city=&dist  =https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01688-xChronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePulmonary rehabilitationExerciseNeuromuscular powerForce measurement platformVibration platform
spellingShingle Rainer Gloeckl
Tessa Schneeberger
Daniela Leitl
Tobias Reinold
Christoph Nell
Inga Jarosch
Klaus Kenn
Andreas R. Koczulla
Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
Respiratory Research
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Pulmonary rehabilitation
Exercise
Neuromuscular power
Force measurement platform
Vibration platform
title Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort whole body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe copd a randomized controlled trial
topic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Pulmonary rehabilitation
Exercise
Neuromuscular power
Force measurement platform
Vibration platform
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01688-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rainergloeckl wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tessaschneeberger wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danielaleitl wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tobiasreinold wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christophnell wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ingajarosch wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klauskenn wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andreasrkoczulla wholebodyvibrationtrainingversusconventionalbalancetraininginpatientswithseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial