Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective

This article provides empirical evidence of ‘defensive mediatization strategies’ in the field of sport. These are strategies used by actors individually and collectively to control and sometimes avoid media publicity—for example, by refusing requests for media interviews, or in the case of an organi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neil O’Boyle, Aaron Gallagher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Journalism and Media
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/4/2/42
_version_ 1797593945578930176
author Neil O’Boyle
Aaron Gallagher
author_facet Neil O’Boyle
Aaron Gallagher
author_sort Neil O’Boyle
collection DOAJ
description This article provides empirical evidence of ‘defensive mediatization strategies’ in the field of sport. These are strategies used by actors individually and collectively to control and sometimes avoid media publicity—for example, by refusing requests for media interviews, or in the case of an organization, by making media literacy training available to its staff. In this article, we use the concept of defensive mediatization strategies to identify and illuminate some of the challenges facing professional sports journalists in the postbroadcast era. The article draws on findings from an ongoing study of the relationships between professional sports organizations, athletes, and journalists, but reports only on interviews conducted with experienced sports journalists in Ireland and Britain (<i>n</i> = 16). Our analysis identifies a number of defensive mediatization strategies used by sports organizations, including increased levels of in-house media, differential treatment of journalists, and an increasingly competitive stance towards journalism generally. We also consider a potentially more pernicious strategy: the hiring of professional sports journalists as internal communications advisers—a switching of role positions that might be termed ‘poacher turned gamekeeper’. The article organizes findings according to the three categories of defensive mediatization strategies identified in the extant literature (<i>persistence</i>, <i>shielding</i>, and <i>immunization</i>) and proposes a fourth category, which we label <i>steering</i>.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:16:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c6e0e4b45d2e4e089acc5bbf54ddce42
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-5172
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:16:44Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journalism and Media
spelling doaj.art-c6e0e4b45d2e4e089acc5bbf54ddce422023-11-18T11:09:49ZengMDPI AGJournalism and Media2673-51722023-05-014266567810.3390/journalmedia4020042Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s PerspectiveNeil O’Boyle0Aaron Gallagher1School of Communications, Dublin City University, D9 Dublin, IrelandSchool of Communications, Dublin City University, D9 Dublin, IrelandThis article provides empirical evidence of ‘defensive mediatization strategies’ in the field of sport. These are strategies used by actors individually and collectively to control and sometimes avoid media publicity—for example, by refusing requests for media interviews, or in the case of an organization, by making media literacy training available to its staff. In this article, we use the concept of defensive mediatization strategies to identify and illuminate some of the challenges facing professional sports journalists in the postbroadcast era. The article draws on findings from an ongoing study of the relationships between professional sports organizations, athletes, and journalists, but reports only on interviews conducted with experienced sports journalists in Ireland and Britain (<i>n</i> = 16). Our analysis identifies a number of defensive mediatization strategies used by sports organizations, including increased levels of in-house media, differential treatment of journalists, and an increasingly competitive stance towards journalism generally. We also consider a potentially more pernicious strategy: the hiring of professional sports journalists as internal communications advisers—a switching of role positions that might be termed ‘poacher turned gamekeeper’. The article organizes findings according to the three categories of defensive mediatization strategies identified in the extant literature (<i>persistence</i>, <i>shielding</i>, and <i>immunization</i>) and proposes a fourth category, which we label <i>steering</i>.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/4/2/42sports journalistssports organizationsdefensive mediatizationIrelandBritain
spellingShingle Neil O’Boyle
Aaron Gallagher
Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
Journalism and Media
sports journalists
sports organizations
defensive mediatization
Ireland
Britain
title Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
title_full Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
title_fullStr Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
title_short Sports Organizations and Their Defensive Mediatization Strategies: The Sports Journalist’s Perspective
title_sort sports organizations and their defensive mediatization strategies the sports journalist s perspective
topic sports journalists
sports organizations
defensive mediatization
Ireland
Britain
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/4/2/42
work_keys_str_mv AT neiloboyle sportsorganizationsandtheirdefensivemediatizationstrategiesthesportsjournalistsperspective
AT aarongallagher sportsorganizationsandtheirdefensivemediatizationstrategiesthesportsjournalistsperspective