Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.

Objectives and Approach Free School Meals (FSM) has commonly been used as a proxy for economic disadvantage or low socio-economic background within educational research in the UK, as eligibility is based upon receipt of government welfare benefits. It is also used by government in funding decisions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katy Huxley, Rhys Davies, Catherine Foster, Chris Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2022-08-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/1988
_version_ 1797430696554266624
author Katy Huxley
Rhys Davies
Catherine Foster
Chris Taylor
author_facet Katy Huxley
Rhys Davies
Catherine Foster
Chris Taylor
author_sort Katy Huxley
collection DOAJ
description Objectives and Approach Free School Meals (FSM) has commonly been used as a proxy for economic disadvantage or low socio-economic background within educational research in the UK, as eligibility is based upon receipt of government welfare benefits. It is also used by government in funding decisions for schools. However, in December 2021 the Welsh Government announced that the offer of FSM will be expanded to all pupils in primary schools, meaning that this measure will no longer be available as a proxy. Our objective is therefore to considers the potential of other administrative sources of socio-economic information to fill this gap. Linking administrative education data and Census 2011 data for Wales, we undertook descriptive and regression analyses to consider how Census measures of deprivation act compared to the FSM measure in predicting attainment. Results Our descriptive results show that not all pupils who are eligible for FSM are captured by the Census measures. However, our regression results indicate that socio-economic indicators from the Census – namely highest household qualification, approximated social grade and economic inactivity – all behave in a similar fashion to that of the proxy measure, FSM in association with pupil attainment. Conclusion We consider results in comparison to studies using survey data, and discuss implications for the future measurement of economic disadvantage in Wales among primary school pupils.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:31:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7103f9daa29410da4e30285b854dc48
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:31:17Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-c7103f9daa29410da4e30285b854dc482023-12-02T03:52:13ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082022-08-017310.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1988Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.Katy Huxley0Rhys Davies1Catherine Foster2Chris Taylor3Cardiff UniversityCardiff UniversityCardiff UniversityCardiff UniversityObjectives and Approach Free School Meals (FSM) has commonly been used as a proxy for economic disadvantage or low socio-economic background within educational research in the UK, as eligibility is based upon receipt of government welfare benefits. It is also used by government in funding decisions for schools. However, in December 2021 the Welsh Government announced that the offer of FSM will be expanded to all pupils in primary schools, meaning that this measure will no longer be available as a proxy. Our objective is therefore to considers the potential of other administrative sources of socio-economic information to fill this gap. Linking administrative education data and Census 2011 data for Wales, we undertook descriptive and regression analyses to consider how Census measures of deprivation act compared to the FSM measure in predicting attainment. Results Our descriptive results show that not all pupils who are eligible for FSM are captured by the Census measures. However, our regression results indicate that socio-economic indicators from the Census – namely highest household qualification, approximated social grade and economic inactivity – all behave in a similar fashion to that of the proxy measure, FSM in association with pupil attainment. Conclusion We consider results in comparison to studies using survey data, and discuss implications for the future measurement of economic disadvantage in Wales among primary school pupils. https://ijpds.org/article/view/1988EducationCensusWalesFree School MealsSocio-economic disadvantage
spellingShingle Katy Huxley
Rhys Davies
Catherine Foster
Chris Taylor
Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
International Journal of Population Data Science
Education
Census
Wales
Free School Meals
Socio-economic disadvantage
title Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
title_full Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
title_fullStr Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
title_short Comparing socio-economic measures as predictors of educational attainment.
title_sort comparing socio economic measures as predictors of educational attainment
topic Education
Census
Wales
Free School Meals
Socio-economic disadvantage
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/1988
work_keys_str_mv AT katyhuxley comparingsocioeconomicmeasuresaspredictorsofeducationalattainment
AT rhysdavies comparingsocioeconomicmeasuresaspredictorsofeducationalattainment
AT catherinefoster comparingsocioeconomicmeasuresaspredictorsofeducationalattainment
AT christaylor comparingsocioeconomicmeasuresaspredictorsofeducationalattainment