How should communities be meaningfully engaged (if at all) when setting priorities for biomedical research? Perspectives from the biomedical research community
Abstract Background There is now rising consensus that community engagement is ethically and scientifically essential for all types of health research. Yet debate continues about the moral aims, methods and appropriate timing in the research cycle for community engagement to occur, and whether the a...
Main Authors: | Josephine Borthwick, Natalia Evertsz, Bridget Pratt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00879-5 |
Similar Items
-
Sharing power in global health research: an ethical toolkit for designing priority-setting processes that meaningfully include communities
by: Bridget Pratt
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Developing a toolkit for engagement practice: sharing power with communities in priority-setting for global health research projects
by: Bridget Pratt
Published: (2020-03-01) -
How should multiple myeloma research change in a patient-oriented world? Findings and lessons from the pan-Canadian myeloma priority setting partnership
by: Sarah Bridges, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Achieving inclusive research priority-setting: what do people with lived experience and the public think is essential?
by: Bridget Pratt
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Priority setting for biomedical research including Covid-19 in the northeastern part of Iran
by: Rahim Akrami, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)