Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa
Biological control for sustainable plant protection in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is gaining attention due to low crop productivity caused by pests, increasing costs of agrochemicals, and their harmful impact on health and the environment. A valuable case is the Push–pull technology (PPT) developed by...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2232696 |
| _version_ | 1797680448717979648 |
|---|---|
| author | Olufemi Samson Adesina Stephen Whitfield Susannah M. Sallu Steven M. Sait Jimmy Pittchar |
| author_facet | Olufemi Samson Adesina Stephen Whitfield Susannah M. Sallu Steven M. Sait Jimmy Pittchar |
| author_sort | Olufemi Samson Adesina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Biological control for sustainable plant protection in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is gaining attention due to low crop productivity caused by pests, increasing costs of agrochemicals, and their harmful impact on health and the environment. A valuable case is the Push–pull technology (PPT) developed by the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE). However, evidence for the success of PPT in reducing pest prevalence has not translated from experimentation and demonstration to wider-scale on-farm uptake. A systematic review was conducted to explore the research gaps, benefits of PPT, adoption determinants, barriers to uptake, and how farmers choose to adopt and adapt the technology. The study found a large body of evidence on the biophysical benefits of PPT, which comes from a relatively narrow set of ICIPE-led or managed experiments in Western Kenya. Besides, evidence of its social and economic benefits is less robust. Documented barriers to adoption include initial establishment costs, labour intensiveness, risk averseness of farmers, socio-cultural rigidity, and inadequate access to information and inputs. The review highlights the need for qualitative research, an in-depth examination of the social dynamics of innovation and decision-making processes on farms, and institutions’ role in shaping innovation for sustainable agricultural development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:30:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c7256cdb6a7b47e7a0df19e6ab4845e7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1473-5903 1747-762X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:30:11Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability |
| spelling | doaj.art-c7256cdb6a7b47e7a0df19e6ab4845e72023-09-20T10:18:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability1473-59031747-762X2023-12-0121110.1080/14735903.2023.22326962232696Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan AfricaOlufemi Samson Adesina0Stephen Whitfield1Susannah M. Sallu2Steven M. Sait3Jimmy Pittchar4University of LeedsUniversity of LeedsUniversity of LeedsUniversity of LeedsInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and EcologyBiological control for sustainable plant protection in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is gaining attention due to low crop productivity caused by pests, increasing costs of agrochemicals, and their harmful impact on health and the environment. A valuable case is the Push–pull technology (PPT) developed by the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE). However, evidence for the success of PPT in reducing pest prevalence has not translated from experimentation and demonstration to wider-scale on-farm uptake. A systematic review was conducted to explore the research gaps, benefits of PPT, adoption determinants, barriers to uptake, and how farmers choose to adopt and adapt the technology. The study found a large body of evidence on the biophysical benefits of PPT, which comes from a relatively narrow set of ICIPE-led or managed experiments in Western Kenya. Besides, evidence of its social and economic benefits is less robust. Documented barriers to adoption include initial establishment costs, labour intensiveness, risk averseness of farmers, socio-cultural rigidity, and inadequate access to information and inputs. The review highlights the need for qualitative research, an in-depth examination of the social dynamics of innovation and decision-making processes on farms, and institutions’ role in shaping innovation for sustainable agricultural development.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2232696push–pull technologybiocontrolintegrated pest managementagricultural innovationafrica |
| spellingShingle | Olufemi Samson Adesina Stephen Whitfield Susannah M. Sallu Steven M. Sait Jimmy Pittchar Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability push–pull technology biocontrol integrated pest management agricultural innovation africa |
| title | Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa |
| title_full | Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa |
| title_fullStr | Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa |
| title_short | Bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research: a systematic review of push–pull biocontrol technology in sub-Saharan Africa |
| title_sort | bridging the gap in agricultural innovation research a systematic review of push pull biocontrol technology in sub saharan africa |
| topic | push–pull technology biocontrol integrated pest management agricultural innovation africa |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2232696 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olufemisamsonadesina bridgingthegapinagriculturalinnovationresearchasystematicreviewofpushpullbiocontroltechnologyinsubsaharanafrica AT stephenwhitfield bridgingthegapinagriculturalinnovationresearchasystematicreviewofpushpullbiocontroltechnologyinsubsaharanafrica AT susannahmsallu bridgingthegapinagriculturalinnovationresearchasystematicreviewofpushpullbiocontroltechnologyinsubsaharanafrica AT stevenmsait bridgingthegapinagriculturalinnovationresearchasystematicreviewofpushpullbiocontroltechnologyinsubsaharanafrica AT jimmypittchar bridgingthegapinagriculturalinnovationresearchasystematicreviewofpushpullbiocontroltechnologyinsubsaharanafrica |