Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A central aim for studying runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in genome-wide SNP data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenoty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simonson Matthew A, Howrigan Daniel P, Keller Matthew C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/12/460
_version_ 1811277772152111104
author Simonson Matthew A
Howrigan Daniel P
Keller Matthew C
author_facet Simonson Matthew A
Howrigan Daniel P
Keller Matthew C
author_sort Simonson Matthew A
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A central aim for studying runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in genome-wide SNP data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenotypes. However, it is unknown which current ROH detection program, and which set of parameters within a given program, is optimal for differentiating ROHs that are truly autozygous from ROHs that are homozygous at the marker level but vary at unmeasured variants between the markers.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>We simulated 120 Mb of sequence data in order to know the true state of autozygosity. We then extracted common variants from this sequence to mimic the properties of SNP platforms and performed ROH analyses using three popular ROH detection programs, PLINK, GERMLINE, and BEAGLE. We varied detection thresholds for each program (e.g., prior probabilities, lengths of ROHs) to understand their effects on detecting known autozygosity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Within the optimal thresholds for each program, PLINK outperformed GERMLINE and BEAGLE in detecting autozygosity from distant common ancestors. PLINK's sliding window algorithm worked best when using SNP data pruned for linkage disequilibrium (LD).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results provide both general and specific recommendations for maximizing autozygosity detection in genome-wide SNP data, and should apply equally well to research on whole-genome autozygosity burden or to research on whether specific autozygous regions are predictive using association mapping methods.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:22:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c72d71a40eb747e89b73ece90aa6df60
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2164
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:22:49Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Genomics
spelling doaj.art-c72d71a40eb747e89b73ece90aa6df602022-12-22T03:10:42ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642011-09-0112146010.1186/1471-2164-12-460Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithmsSimonson Matthew AHowrigan Daniel PKeller Matthew C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A central aim for studying runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in genome-wide SNP data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenotypes. However, it is unknown which current ROH detection program, and which set of parameters within a given program, is optimal for differentiating ROHs that are truly autozygous from ROHs that are homozygous at the marker level but vary at unmeasured variants between the markers.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>We simulated 120 Mb of sequence data in order to know the true state of autozygosity. We then extracted common variants from this sequence to mimic the properties of SNP platforms and performed ROH analyses using three popular ROH detection programs, PLINK, GERMLINE, and BEAGLE. We varied detection thresholds for each program (e.g., prior probabilities, lengths of ROHs) to understand their effects on detecting known autozygosity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Within the optimal thresholds for each program, PLINK outperformed GERMLINE and BEAGLE in detecting autozygosity from distant common ancestors. PLINK's sliding window algorithm worked best when using SNP data pruned for linkage disequilibrium (LD).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results provide both general and specific recommendations for maximizing autozygosity detection in genome-wide SNP data, and should apply equally well to research on whole-genome autozygosity burden or to research on whether specific autozygous regions are predictive using association mapping methods.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/12/460
spellingShingle Simonson Matthew A
Howrigan Daniel P
Keller Matthew C
Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
BMC Genomics
title Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
title_full Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
title_fullStr Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
title_short Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
title_sort detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity a comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/12/460
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsonmatthewa detectingautozygositythroughrunsofhomozygosityacomparisonofthreeautozygositydetectionalgorithms
AT howrigandanielp detectingautozygositythroughrunsofhomozygosityacomparisonofthreeautozygositydetectionalgorithms
AT kellermatthewc detectingautozygositythroughrunsofhomozygosityacomparisonofthreeautozygositydetectionalgorithms