Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences
Although habitat loss has large, consistently negative effects on biodiversity, its genetic consequences are not yet fully understood. This is because measuring the genetic consequences of habitat loss requires accounting for major methodological limitations like the confounding effect of habitat fr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.01101/full |
_version_ | 1818065425016029184 |
---|---|
author | Carolina S. Carvalho Éder C. M. Lanes Amanda R. Silva Amanda R. Silva Cecilio F. Caldeira Nelson Carvalho-Filho Markus Gastauer Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca Wilson Nascimento Júnior Guilherme Oliveira José O. Siqueira Pedro L. Viana Rodolfo Jaffé Rodolfo Jaffé |
author_facet | Carolina S. Carvalho Éder C. M. Lanes Amanda R. Silva Amanda R. Silva Cecilio F. Caldeira Nelson Carvalho-Filho Markus Gastauer Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca Wilson Nascimento Júnior Guilherme Oliveira José O. Siqueira Pedro L. Viana Rodolfo Jaffé Rodolfo Jaffé |
author_sort | Carolina S. Carvalho |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Although habitat loss has large, consistently negative effects on biodiversity, its genetic consequences are not yet fully understood. This is because measuring the genetic consequences of habitat loss requires accounting for major methodological limitations like the confounding effect of habitat fragmentation, historical processes underpinning genetic differentiation, time-lags between the onset of disturbances and genetic outcomes, and the need for large numbers of samples, genetic markers, and replicated landscapes to ensure sufficient statistical power. In this paper we overcame all these challenges to assess the genetic consequences of extreme habitat loss driven by mining in two herbs endemic to Amazonian savannas. Relying on genotyping-by-sequencing of hundreds of individuals collected across two mining landscapes, we identified thousands of neutral and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each species and used these to evaluate population structure, genetic diversity, and gene flow. Since open-pit mining in our study region rarely involves habitat fragmentation, we were able to assess the independent effect of habitat loss. We also accounted for the underlying population structure when assessing landscape effects on genetic diversity and gene flow, examined the sensitivity of our analyses to the resolution of spatial data, and used annual species and cross-year analyses to minimize and quantify possible time-lag effects. We found that both species are remarkably resilient, as genetic diversity and gene flow patterns were unaffected by habitat loss. Whereas historical habitat amount was found to influence inbreeding; heterozygosity and inbreeding were not affected by habitat loss in either species, and gene flow was mainly influenced by geographic distance, pre-mining land cover, and local climate. Our study demonstrates that it is not possible to generalize about the genetic consequences of habitat loss, and implies that future conservation efforts need to consider species-specific genetic information. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:51:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c72f07c650484c85831385e8e59106f8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-8021 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:51:41Z |
publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Genetics |
spelling | doaj.art-c72f07c650484c85831385e8e59106f82022-12-22T01:44:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212019-11-011010.3389/fgene.2019.01101455095Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic ConsequencesCarolina S. Carvalho0Éder C. M. Lanes1Amanda R. Silva2Amanda R. Silva3Cecilio F. Caldeira4Nelson Carvalho-Filho5Markus Gastauer6Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca7Wilson Nascimento Júnior8Guilherme Oliveira9José O. Siqueira10Pedro L. Viana11Rodolfo Jaffé12Rodolfo Jaffé13Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, BrazilInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, BrazilDepartamento de Ecologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilAlthough habitat loss has large, consistently negative effects on biodiversity, its genetic consequences are not yet fully understood. This is because measuring the genetic consequences of habitat loss requires accounting for major methodological limitations like the confounding effect of habitat fragmentation, historical processes underpinning genetic differentiation, time-lags between the onset of disturbances and genetic outcomes, and the need for large numbers of samples, genetic markers, and replicated landscapes to ensure sufficient statistical power. In this paper we overcame all these challenges to assess the genetic consequences of extreme habitat loss driven by mining in two herbs endemic to Amazonian savannas. Relying on genotyping-by-sequencing of hundreds of individuals collected across two mining landscapes, we identified thousands of neutral and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each species and used these to evaluate population structure, genetic diversity, and gene flow. Since open-pit mining in our study region rarely involves habitat fragmentation, we were able to assess the independent effect of habitat loss. We also accounted for the underlying population structure when assessing landscape effects on genetic diversity and gene flow, examined the sensitivity of our analyses to the resolution of spatial data, and used annual species and cross-year analyses to minimize and quantify possible time-lag effects. We found that both species are remarkably resilient, as genetic diversity and gene flow patterns were unaffected by habitat loss. Whereas historical habitat amount was found to influence inbreeding; heterozygosity and inbreeding were not affected by habitat loss in either species, and gene flow was mainly influenced by geographic distance, pre-mining land cover, and local climate. Our study demonstrates that it is not possible to generalize about the genetic consequences of habitat loss, and implies that future conservation efforts need to consider species-specific genetic information.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.01101/fullgene flowgenetic diversityisolation by resistancelandscape genomicsopen-pit miningRAD sequencing |
spellingShingle | Carolina S. Carvalho Éder C. M. Lanes Amanda R. Silva Amanda R. Silva Cecilio F. Caldeira Nelson Carvalho-Filho Markus Gastauer Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca Wilson Nascimento Júnior Guilherme Oliveira José O. Siqueira Pedro L. Viana Rodolfo Jaffé Rodolfo Jaffé Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences Frontiers in Genetics gene flow genetic diversity isolation by resistance landscape genomics open-pit mining RAD sequencing |
title | Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences |
title_full | Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences |
title_fullStr | Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences |
title_short | Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences |
title_sort | habitat loss does not always entail negative genetic consequences |
topic | gene flow genetic diversity isolation by resistance landscape genomics open-pit mining RAD sequencing |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.01101/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinascarvalho habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT edercmlanes habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT amandarsilva habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT amandarsilva habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT ceciliofcaldeira habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT nelsoncarvalhofilho habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT markusgastauer habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT veralimperatrizfonseca habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT wilsonnascimentojunior habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT guilhermeoliveira habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT joseosiqueira habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT pedrolviana habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT rodolfojaffe habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences AT rodolfojaffe habitatlossdoesnotalwaysentailnegativegeneticconsequences |