The Sharing Game

Economic games involving allocation of resources have been a useful tool for the study of decision making for both psychologists and economists. In two experiments involving a repeated-trials game over twenty opportunities, undergraduates made choices to distribute resources between themselves and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arthur Kennelly, Edmund Fantino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2007-06-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm07004.pdf
_version_ 1797725693869555712
author Arthur Kennelly
Edmund Fantino
author_facet Arthur Kennelly
Edmund Fantino
author_sort Arthur Kennelly
collection DOAJ
description Economic games involving allocation of resources have been a useful tool for the study of decision making for both psychologists and economists. In two experiments involving a repeated-trials game over twenty opportunities, undergraduates made choices to distribute resources between themselves and an unseen, passive other either optimally (for themselves) but non-competitively, equally but non-optimally, or least optimally but competitively. Surprisingly, whether participants were told that the anonymous other was another student or a computer did not matter. Using such terms as ``game'' and ``player'' in the course of the session was associated with an increased frequency of competitive interaction was found in the first experiment. In agreement with prior research, participants whose resources were backed by monetary incentive acted the most optimally. Overall, equality was the modal strategy employed, although it is clear that motivational context affects the allocation of resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:34:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c73903d37fb841398d62a95771a7018c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:34:57Z
publishDate 2007-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-c73903d37fb841398d62a95771a7018c2023-09-02T08:57:22ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752007-06-012NA204216The Sharing GameArthur KennellyEdmund FantinoEconomic games involving allocation of resources have been a useful tool for the study of decision making for both psychologists and economists. In two experiments involving a repeated-trials game over twenty opportunities, undergraduates made choices to distribute resources between themselves and an unseen, passive other either optimally (for themselves) but non-competitively, equally but non-optimally, or least optimally but competitively. Surprisingly, whether participants were told that the anonymous other was another student or a computer did not matter. Using such terms as ``game'' and ``player'' in the course of the session was associated with an increased frequency of competitive interaction was found in the first experiment. In agreement with prior research, participants whose resources were backed by monetary incentive acted the most optimally. Overall, equality was the modal strategy employed, although it is clear that motivational context affects the allocation of resources.http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm07004.pdfdistributive fairnessgenderhuman-computer interactionmonetary incentiveresource allocationSharing Game.
spellingShingle Arthur Kennelly
Edmund Fantino
The Sharing Game
Judgment and Decision Making
distributive fairness
gender
human-computer interaction
monetary incentive
resource allocation
Sharing Game.
title The Sharing Game
title_full The Sharing Game
title_fullStr The Sharing Game
title_full_unstemmed The Sharing Game
title_short The Sharing Game
title_sort sharing game
topic distributive fairness
gender
human-computer interaction
monetary incentive
resource allocation
Sharing Game.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm07004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT arthurkennelly thesharinggame
AT edmundfantino thesharinggame
AT arthurkennelly sharinggame
AT edmundfantino sharinggame