THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT
The aim of this study was to investigate how frequently the different forms of work (frontal, individual and group) are used in the Serbian inclusive education. The sample consisted of 16 elementary schools in Serbia which pupils with sensory impairments attend (visual and auditory impairments: N=...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute for Human Rehabilitation
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | Human Research in Rehabilitation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://human.ba/wpdm-package/full-text-158/?wpdmdl=1220 |
| _version_ | 1797418967226122240 |
|---|---|
| author | Saša Stepanović |
| author_facet | Saša Stepanović |
| author_sort | Saša Stepanović |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study was to investigate how frequently the different forms of work (frontal, individual and group) are
used in the Serbian inclusive education. The sample consisted of 16 elementary schools in Serbia which pupils with
sensory impairments attend (visual and auditory impairments: N=69). Systematic observation has been used on 382
classes. Results have shown that in the majority of classes the frontal form was predominantly used (67.7%). Significantly
less present was the individual form (22.6%), while the variations of group work were the least frequently used.
Considering the goals of inclusive education with the fact that the social engagement of pupils with sensory impairments
in class can be beneficial, the frontal form alone is not enough for an effective teaching process. Despite its practicality,
it is necessary to use the frontal form in balance with other work forms in all the phases of the class. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:40:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c73f74f63be5455694b038b498b65e21 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2232-9935 2232-996X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:40:40Z |
| publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Human Rehabilitation |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Human Research in Rehabilitation |
| spelling | doaj.art-c73f74f63be5455694b038b498b65e212023-12-03T10:51:23ZengInstitute for Human RehabilitationHuman Research in Rehabilitation2232-99352232-996X2018-09-0182475410.21554/hrr.091805THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENTSaša Stepanović0Elementary School ‘’Mladost’’, Belgrade, SerbiaThe aim of this study was to investigate how frequently the different forms of work (frontal, individual and group) are used in the Serbian inclusive education. The sample consisted of 16 elementary schools in Serbia which pupils with sensory impairments attend (visual and auditory impairments: N=69). Systematic observation has been used on 382 classes. Results have shown that in the majority of classes the frontal form was predominantly used (67.7%). Significantly less present was the individual form (22.6%), while the variations of group work were the least frequently used. Considering the goals of inclusive education with the fact that the social engagement of pupils with sensory impairments in class can be beneficial, the frontal form alone is not enough for an effective teaching process. Despite its practicality, it is necessary to use the frontal form in balance with other work forms in all the phases of the class.https://human.ba/wpdm-package/full-text-158/?wpdmdl=1220frontal work formgroup work forminclusionindividual work formpupils with sensory impairmentswork forms of teaching |
| spellingShingle | Saša Stepanović THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT Human Research in Rehabilitation frontal work form group work form inclusion individual work form pupils with sensory impairments work forms of teaching |
| title | THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT |
| title_full | THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT |
| title_fullStr | THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT |
| title_short | THE FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF DIFFERENT WORK FORMS IN AN INCLUSIVE TEACHING ENVIRONMENT |
| title_sort | frequency of usage of different work forms in an inclusive teaching environment |
| topic | frontal work form group work form inclusion individual work form pupils with sensory impairments work forms of teaching |
| url | https://human.ba/wpdm-package/full-text-158/?wpdmdl=1220 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sasastepanovic thefrequencyofusageofdifferentworkformsinaninclusiveteachingenvironment AT sasastepanovic frequencyofusageofdifferentworkformsinaninclusiveteachingenvironment |