Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to compare the effect of two preservative-free (PF) artificial tears, one containing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (control group) vs another containing hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar (HA + HP-guar) (study group), on the healing of the corneal epithelium...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Cañones-Zafra, Juan P. Abad, Miriam Castellanos, Cristina Muñiz, Haris Sideroudi, Miguel A. Teus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2023-11-01
Series:Ophthalmology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00847-1
_version_ 1797355947825299456
author Rafael Cañones-Zafra
Juan P. Abad
Miriam Castellanos
Cristina Muñiz
Haris Sideroudi
Miguel A. Teus
author_facet Rafael Cañones-Zafra
Juan P. Abad
Miriam Castellanos
Cristina Muñiz
Haris Sideroudi
Miguel A. Teus
author_sort Rafael Cañones-Zafra
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This study aimed to compare the effect of two preservative-free (PF) artificial tears, one containing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (control group) vs another containing hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar (HA + HP-guar) (study group), on the healing of the corneal epithelium and the ocular discomfort after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery. Methods A total of 68 patients that were scheduled to have PRK to correct myopia were randomized into two groups: 34 patients (68 eyes) in the study group and 34 patients (68 eyes) in the control group. Ocular examinations were performed on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 30, and 90, evaluating the diameter of the de-epithelized cornea, the fluorescein staining using the Oxford scale, the tear film osmolarity and stability (tear breakup time), and the pain using visual analog scale (VAS). Results On postoperative day 4, 97% of the study eyes vs 84.4% of the control eyes were completely re-epithelized (p = 0.01). Less ocular pain was observed on postoperative day 3 in the study group (5.0 (3.0–6.0) vs 6.0 (3.5–7.0), p = 0.03). No differences were observed beyond postoperative day 7 in the healing of the corneal epithelium, non-invasive Keratograph breakup time (NIKBUT), and the self-perceived ocular discomfort between the two groups. Conclusion The current study shows faster healing of the corneal epithelium and less ocular pain and discomfort in the first days after PRK with the use of topical lubricants containing HA + HP-guar compared to conventional CMC artificial tears, probably due to the different trophic effect of the aforementioned tears on the corneal epithelial cells. Trial Registration EudraCT No. 2020-003488-25.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:19:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7439a9a561b497dbd347468841c4589
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-8245
2193-6528
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:19:32Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Ophthalmology and Therapy
spelling doaj.art-c7439a9a561b497dbd347468841c45892024-01-14T12:14:19ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareOphthalmology and Therapy2193-82452193-65282023-11-0113139740710.1007/s40123-023-00847-1Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive KeratectomyRafael Cañones-Zafra0Juan P. Abad1Miriam Castellanos2Cristina Muñiz3Haris Sideroudi4Miguel A. Teus5Universidad de AlcaláClínica NovovisiónClínica NovovisiónClínica NovovisiónDemocritus University of ThraceUniversidad de AlcaláAbstract Introduction This study aimed to compare the effect of two preservative-free (PF) artificial tears, one containing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (control group) vs another containing hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar (HA + HP-guar) (study group), on the healing of the corneal epithelium and the ocular discomfort after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery. Methods A total of 68 patients that were scheduled to have PRK to correct myopia were randomized into two groups: 34 patients (68 eyes) in the study group and 34 patients (68 eyes) in the control group. Ocular examinations were performed on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 30, and 90, evaluating the diameter of the de-epithelized cornea, the fluorescein staining using the Oxford scale, the tear film osmolarity and stability (tear breakup time), and the pain using visual analog scale (VAS). Results On postoperative day 4, 97% of the study eyes vs 84.4% of the control eyes were completely re-epithelized (p = 0.01). Less ocular pain was observed on postoperative day 3 in the study group (5.0 (3.0–6.0) vs 6.0 (3.5–7.0), p = 0.03). No differences were observed beyond postoperative day 7 in the healing of the corneal epithelium, non-invasive Keratograph breakup time (NIKBUT), and the self-perceived ocular discomfort between the two groups. Conclusion The current study shows faster healing of the corneal epithelium and less ocular pain and discomfort in the first days after PRK with the use of topical lubricants containing HA + HP-guar compared to conventional CMC artificial tears, probably due to the different trophic effect of the aforementioned tears on the corneal epithelial cells. Trial Registration EudraCT No. 2020-003488-25.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00847-1Refractive surgeryDry eyesCarboxymethylcelluloseHyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guarArtificial tears
spellingShingle Rafael Cañones-Zafra
Juan P. Abad
Miriam Castellanos
Cristina Muñiz
Haris Sideroudi
Miguel A. Teus
Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Refractive surgery
Dry eyes
Carboxymethylcellulose
Hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar
Artificial tears
title Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short Comparison of Two Topical Lubricants on the Corneal Surface Recovery and Patient Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort comparison of two topical lubricants on the corneal surface recovery and patient discomfort after photorefractive keratectomy
topic Refractive surgery
Dry eyes
Carboxymethylcellulose
Hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar
Artificial tears
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00847-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelcanoneszafra comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT juanpabad comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT miriamcastellanos comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT cristinamuniz comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT harissideroudi comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT miguelateus comparisonoftwotopicallubricantsonthecornealsurfacerecoveryandpatientdiscomfortafterphotorefractivekeratectomy