Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier

Fedchenko Glacier experienced a large thickness loss since the first scientific investigations in 1928. As the largest glacier in the Pamir Mountains, this glacier plays an important role for the regional glacier mass budget. We use a series of Global Navigation Satellite Systems observations from 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. LAMBRECHT, C. MAYER, A. WENDT, D. FLORICIOIU, C. VÖLKSEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018-08-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000527/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155885772242944
author A. LAMBRECHT
C. MAYER
A. WENDT
D. FLORICIOIU
C. VÖLKSEN
author_facet A. LAMBRECHT
C. MAYER
A. WENDT
D. FLORICIOIU
C. VÖLKSEN
author_sort A. LAMBRECHT
collection DOAJ
description Fedchenko Glacier experienced a large thickness loss since the first scientific investigations in 1928. As the largest glacier in the Pamir Mountains, this glacier plays an important role for the regional glacier mass budget. We use a series of Global Navigation Satellite Systems observations from 2009 to 2016 and TanDEM-X elevation models from 2011 to 2016 to investigate recent elevation changes. Accounting for radar wave penetration minimizes biases in elevation that can otherwise reach up to 6 m in dry snow on Fedchenko Glacier, with mean values of 3–4 m in the high accumulation regions. The seasonal elevation changes reach up to ±5 m. The glacier surface elevation decreased along its entire length over multi-year periods. Thinning rates increased between 2000 and 2016 by a factor of 1.8 compared with 1928–2000, resulting in peak values of 1.5 m a−1. Even the highest accumulation basins above 5000 m elevation have been affected by glacier thinning with change rates between −0.2 and −0.4 m a−1 from 2009 to 2016. The estimated glacier-wide mass-balance rates are −0.27 ± 0.05 m w.e. a−1 for 2000 to 2011 and −0.51 ± 0.04 m w.e. a−1 between 2011 and 2016.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7503777794346679d2659445afc9ce9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:08Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-c7503777794346679d2659445afc9ce92023-03-09T12:40:38ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522018-08-016463764810.1017/jog.2018.52Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacierA. LAMBRECHT0C. MAYER1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4608A. WENDT2D. FLORICIOIU3C. VÖLKSEN4Geodesy and Glaciology, Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich, GermanyGeodesy and Glaciology, Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich, GermanyGeodesy and Glaciology, Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich, GermanyRemote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling, GermanyGeodesy and Glaciology, Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich, GermanyFedchenko Glacier experienced a large thickness loss since the first scientific investigations in 1928. As the largest glacier in the Pamir Mountains, this glacier plays an important role for the regional glacier mass budget. We use a series of Global Navigation Satellite Systems observations from 2009 to 2016 and TanDEM-X elevation models from 2011 to 2016 to investigate recent elevation changes. Accounting for radar wave penetration minimizes biases in elevation that can otherwise reach up to 6 m in dry snow on Fedchenko Glacier, with mean values of 3–4 m in the high accumulation regions. The seasonal elevation changes reach up to ±5 m. The glacier surface elevation decreased along its entire length over multi-year periods. Thinning rates increased between 2000 and 2016 by a factor of 1.8 compared with 1928–2000, resulting in peak values of 1.5 m a−1. Even the highest accumulation basins above 5000 m elevation have been affected by glacier thinning with change rates between −0.2 and −0.4 m a−1 from 2009 to 2016. The estimated glacier-wide mass-balance rates are −0.27 ± 0.05 m w.e. a−1 for 2000 to 2011 and −0.51 ± 0.04 m w.e. a−1 between 2011 and 2016.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000527/type/journal_articleapplied glaciologyglacier fluctuationsglacier monitoringmountain glaciersremote sensing
spellingShingle A. LAMBRECHT
C. MAYER
A. WENDT
D. FLORICIOIU
C. VÖLKSEN
Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
Journal of Glaciology
applied glaciology
glacier fluctuations
glacier monitoring
mountain glaciers
remote sensing
title Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
title_full Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
title_fullStr Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
title_full_unstemmed Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
title_short Elevation change of Fedchenko Glacier, Pamir Mountains, from GNSS field measurements and TanDEM-X elevation models, with a focus on the upper glacier
title_sort elevation change of fedchenko glacier pamir mountains from gnss field measurements and tandem x elevation models with a focus on the upper glacier
topic applied glaciology
glacier fluctuations
glacier monitoring
mountain glaciers
remote sensing
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000527/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT alambrecht elevationchangeoffedchenkoglacierpamirmountainsfromgnssfieldmeasurementsandtandemxelevationmodelswithafocusontheupperglacier
AT cmayer elevationchangeoffedchenkoglacierpamirmountainsfromgnssfieldmeasurementsandtandemxelevationmodelswithafocusontheupperglacier
AT awendt elevationchangeoffedchenkoglacierpamirmountainsfromgnssfieldmeasurementsandtandemxelevationmodelswithafocusontheupperglacier
AT dfloricioiu elevationchangeoffedchenkoglacierpamirmountainsfromgnssfieldmeasurementsandtandemxelevationmodelswithafocusontheupperglacier
AT cvolksen elevationchangeoffedchenkoglacierpamirmountainsfromgnssfieldmeasurementsandtandemxelevationmodelswithafocusontheupperglacier