Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols

Abstract Background Resuscitation guidance has advanced; however, the predictive performance of the termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule has not been validated for different resuscitation protocols published by the American Heart Association (AHA). Methods A retrospective study validating the bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Yuan Lin, Yin-Yu Lai, Hung-Chieh Chang, Chien-Hsin Lu, Po-Wei Chiu, Yuh-Shin Kuo, Shao-Peng Huang, Ying-Hsin Chang, Chih-Hao Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00606-8
_version_ 1819052110051803136
author Yu-Yuan Lin
Yin-Yu Lai
Hung-Chieh Chang
Chien-Hsin Lu
Po-Wei Chiu
Yuh-Shin Kuo
Shao-Peng Huang
Ying-Hsin Chang
Chih-Hao Lin
author_facet Yu-Yuan Lin
Yin-Yu Lai
Hung-Chieh Chang
Chien-Hsin Lu
Po-Wei Chiu
Yuh-Shin Kuo
Shao-Peng Huang
Ying-Hsin Chang
Chih-Hao Lin
author_sort Yu-Yuan Lin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Resuscitation guidance has advanced; however, the predictive performance of the termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule has not been validated for different resuscitation protocols published by the American Heart Association (AHA). Methods A retrospective study validating the basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) TOR rules was conducted using an Utstein-style database in Tainan city, Taiwan. Adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, (using the AHA 2010 resuscitation protocol) and from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, (using the AHA 2015 resuscitation protocol) were included. The characteristics of rule performance were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Results Among 1260 eligible OHCA patients in 2015, 757 met the BLS TOR rule and 124 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 61.1% and 99.0%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 93.8% and 99.2%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. A total of 970 OHCA patients were enrolled in 2020, of whom 438 met the BLS TOR rule and 104 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 85.7% and 100%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 99.5% and 100%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. Conclusions Both the BLS and ALS TOR rules performed better when using the 2015 AHA resuscitation protocols compared to the 2010 protocols, with increased PPVs and decreased false-positive rates in predicting survival to discharge and good neurological outcomes at discharge. The BLS and ALS TOR rules can perform differently while the resuscitation protocols are updated. As the concepts and practices of resuscitation progress, the BLS and ALS TOR rules should be evaluated and validated accordingly.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:14:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c762282bccf54968934bb4fbeb10ab47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-227X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:14:37Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c762282bccf54968934bb4fbeb10ab472022-12-21T19:04:29ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2022-03-012211910.1186/s12873-022-00606-8Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocolsYu-Yuan Lin0Yin-Yu Lai1Hung-Chieh Chang2Chien-Hsin Lu3Po-Wei Chiu4Yuh-Shin Kuo5Shao-Peng Huang6Ying-Hsin Chang7Chih-Hao Lin8Department of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityAbstract Background Resuscitation guidance has advanced; however, the predictive performance of the termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule has not been validated for different resuscitation protocols published by the American Heart Association (AHA). Methods A retrospective study validating the basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) TOR rules was conducted using an Utstein-style database in Tainan city, Taiwan. Adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, (using the AHA 2010 resuscitation protocol) and from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, (using the AHA 2015 resuscitation protocol) were included. The characteristics of rule performance were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Results Among 1260 eligible OHCA patients in 2015, 757 met the BLS TOR rule and 124 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 61.1% and 99.0%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 93.8% and 99.2%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. A total of 970 OHCA patients were enrolled in 2020, of whom 438 met the BLS TOR rule and 104 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 85.7% and 100%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 99.5% and 100%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. Conclusions Both the BLS and ALS TOR rules performed better when using the 2015 AHA resuscitation protocols compared to the 2010 protocols, with increased PPVs and decreased false-positive rates in predicting survival to discharge and good neurological outcomes at discharge. The BLS and ALS TOR rules can perform differently while the resuscitation protocols are updated. As the concepts and practices of resuscitation progress, the BLS and ALS TOR rules should be evaluated and validated accordingly.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00606-8Out-of-hospital cardiac arrestPredictive performanceTermination of resuscitationResuscitationBasic life supportAdvanced life support
spellingShingle Yu-Yuan Lin
Yin-Yu Lai
Hung-Chieh Chang
Chien-Hsin Lu
Po-Wei Chiu
Yuh-Shin Kuo
Shao-Peng Huang
Ying-Hsin Chang
Chih-Hao Lin
Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
BMC Emergency Medicine
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Predictive performance
Termination of resuscitation
Resuscitation
Basic life support
Advanced life support
title Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
title_full Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
title_fullStr Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
title_full_unstemmed Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
title_short Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
title_sort predictive performances of als and bls termination of resuscitation rules in out of hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols
topic Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Predictive performance
Termination of resuscitation
Resuscitation
Basic life support
Advanced life support
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00606-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyuanlin predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT yinyulai predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT hungchiehchang predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT chienhsinlu predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT poweichiu predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT yuhshinkuo predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT shaopenghuang predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT yinghsinchang predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols
AT chihhaolin predictiveperformancesofalsandblsterminationofresuscitationrulesinoutofhospitalcardiacarrestfordifferentresuscitationprotocols