Negative results provide valuable evidence for conservation
A pervasive publication bias, whereby studies that report positive results are prioritised over those that report negative findings, has been shown to exist in the disciplines that conservation practice and policy draw information from. The bias reflects the preferential submission of positive resul...
Main Author: | Kevin A. Wood |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064420300663 |
Similar Items
-
Negative Results in European Psychology Journals
by: Martin Rachev Vasilev
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Principles for the production of evidence‐based guidance for conservation actions
by: Harriet Downey, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Boosting Immunity of the Registered Reports System in Psychology to the Pandemic
by: Kyoshiro Sasaki, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Navigating spaces between conservation research and practice: Are we making progress?
by: Rebecca M. Jarvis, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Joseph Carpue's file drawer experiment – A murder mystery from 1801
by: M. Felix Freshwater
Published: (2015-12-01)