Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods.
Fabricating method may affect the surface properties and biological characteristics of provisional restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by the conventional, digital subtractive and addi...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249551 |
| _version_ | 1818716559753871360 |
|---|---|
| author | Rashin Giti Shima Dabiri Mohammad Motamedifar Reza Derafshi |
| author_facet | Rashin Giti Shima Dabiri Mohammad Motamedifar Reza Derafshi |
| author_sort | Rashin Giti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Fabricating method may affect the surface properties and biological characteristics of provisional restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by the conventional, digital subtractive and additive methods. Sixty-six bar-shaped specimens (2×4×10 mm) were fabricated by using provisional restorative materials through the conventional, digital subtractive and additive methods (n = 22 per group). Ten specimens of each group were used for surface roughness and plaque accumulation tests, 10 specimens for cytotoxicity assay, and 2 specimens of each group were used for qualitative assessment by scanning electron microscopy. The Ra (roughness average) and Rz (roughness height) values (μm) were measured via profilometer, and visual inspection was performed through scanning electron microscopy. Plaque accumulation of Streptococcus mutans and cytotoxicity on human gingival fibroblast-like cells were evaluated. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Surface roughness, biofilm accumulation and cytotoxicity were significantly different among the groups (P<0.05). Surface roughness was significantly higher in the conventional group (P<0.05); however, the two other groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). Significantly higher bacterial attachment was observed in the additive group than the subtractive (P<0.001) and conventional group (P = 0.025); while, the conventional and subtractive groups were statistically similar (P = 0.111). Regarding the cytotoxicity, the additive group had significantly higher cell viability than the subtractive group (P = 0.006); yet, the conventional group was not significantly different from the additive (P = 0.354) and subtractive group (P = 0.101). Surface roughness was the highest in conventionally cured group; but, the additive group had the most plaque accumulation and lowest cytotoxicity. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T19:21:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c76704d398af437c840b877ef88e0248 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T19:21:11Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-c76704d398af437c840b877ef88e02482022-12-21T21:35:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01164e024955110.1371/journal.pone.0249551Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods.Rashin GitiShima DabiriMohammad MotamedifarReza DerafshiFabricating method may affect the surface properties and biological characteristics of provisional restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by the conventional, digital subtractive and additive methods. Sixty-six bar-shaped specimens (2×4×10 mm) were fabricated by using provisional restorative materials through the conventional, digital subtractive and additive methods (n = 22 per group). Ten specimens of each group were used for surface roughness and plaque accumulation tests, 10 specimens for cytotoxicity assay, and 2 specimens of each group were used for qualitative assessment by scanning electron microscopy. The Ra (roughness average) and Rz (roughness height) values (μm) were measured via profilometer, and visual inspection was performed through scanning electron microscopy. Plaque accumulation of Streptococcus mutans and cytotoxicity on human gingival fibroblast-like cells were evaluated. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Surface roughness, biofilm accumulation and cytotoxicity were significantly different among the groups (P<0.05). Surface roughness was significantly higher in the conventional group (P<0.05); however, the two other groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). Significantly higher bacterial attachment was observed in the additive group than the subtractive (P<0.001) and conventional group (P = 0.025); while, the conventional and subtractive groups were statistically similar (P = 0.111). Regarding the cytotoxicity, the additive group had significantly higher cell viability than the subtractive group (P = 0.006); yet, the conventional group was not significantly different from the additive (P = 0.354) and subtractive group (P = 0.101). Surface roughness was the highest in conventionally cured group; but, the additive group had the most plaque accumulation and lowest cytotoxicity.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249551 |
| spellingShingle | Rashin Giti Shima Dabiri Mohammad Motamedifar Reza Derafshi Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. PLoS ONE |
| title | Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. |
| title_full | Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. |
| title_fullStr | Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. |
| title_short | Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. |
| title_sort | surface roughness plaque accumulation and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249551 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rashingiti surfaceroughnessplaqueaccumulationandcytotoxicityofprovisionalrestorativematerialsfabricatedbydifferentmethods AT shimadabiri surfaceroughnessplaqueaccumulationandcytotoxicityofprovisionalrestorativematerialsfabricatedbydifferentmethods AT mohammadmotamedifar surfaceroughnessplaqueaccumulationandcytotoxicityofprovisionalrestorativematerialsfabricatedbydifferentmethods AT rezaderafshi surfaceroughnessplaqueaccumulationandcytotoxicityofprovisionalrestorativematerialsfabricatedbydifferentmethods |