The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years it has been found that the combination of evolutionary game theory with population structures modelled in terms of dynamical graphs, in which individuals are allowed to sever unwanted social ties while keeping the goo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nowé Ann, Santos Francisco C, Van Segbroeck Sven, Pacheco Jorge M, Lenaerts Tom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-10-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/287
_version_ 1798029195880693760
author Nowé Ann
Santos Francisco C
Van Segbroeck Sven
Pacheco Jorge M
Lenaerts Tom
author_facet Nowé Ann
Santos Francisco C
Van Segbroeck Sven
Pacheco Jorge M
Lenaerts Tom
author_sort Nowé Ann
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years it has been found that the combination of evolutionary game theory with population structures modelled in terms of dynamical graphs, in which individuals are allowed to sever unwanted social ties while keeping the good ones, provides a viable solution to the conundrum of cooperation. It is well known that in reality individuals respond differently to disadvantageous interactions. Yet, the evolutionary mechanism determining the individuals' willingness to sever unfavourable ties remains unclear.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We introduce a novel way of thinking about the joint evolution of cooperation and social contacts. The struggle for survival between cooperators and defectors leads to an arms race for swiftness in adjusting social ties, based purely on a self-regarding, individual judgement. Since defectors are never able to establish social ties under mutual agreement, they break adverse ties more rapidly than cooperators, who tend to evolve stable and long-term relations. Ironically, defectors' constant search for partners to exploit leads to heterogeneous networks that improve the survivability of cooperators, compared to the traditional homogenous population assumption.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>When communities face the prisoner's dilemma, swift reaction to adverse ties evolves when competition is fierce between cooperators and defectors, providing an evolutionary basis for the necessity of individuals to adjust their social ties. Our results show how our innate resilience to change relates to mutual agreement between cooperators and how "loyalty" or persistent social ties bring along an evolutionary disadvantage, both from an individual and group perspective.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:20:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7683e0a9c894bcd9408207955bc2e4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:20:23Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
spelling doaj.art-c7683e0a9c894bcd9408207955bc2e4b2022-12-22T04:07:19ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482008-10-018128710.1186/1471-2148-8-287The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse tiesNowé AnnSantos Francisco CVan Segbroeck SvenPacheco Jorge MLenaerts Tom<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years it has been found that the combination of evolutionary game theory with population structures modelled in terms of dynamical graphs, in which individuals are allowed to sever unwanted social ties while keeping the good ones, provides a viable solution to the conundrum of cooperation. It is well known that in reality individuals respond differently to disadvantageous interactions. Yet, the evolutionary mechanism determining the individuals' willingness to sever unfavourable ties remains unclear.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We introduce a novel way of thinking about the joint evolution of cooperation and social contacts. The struggle for survival between cooperators and defectors leads to an arms race for swiftness in adjusting social ties, based purely on a self-regarding, individual judgement. Since defectors are never able to establish social ties under mutual agreement, they break adverse ties more rapidly than cooperators, who tend to evolve stable and long-term relations. Ironically, defectors' constant search for partners to exploit leads to heterogeneous networks that improve the survivability of cooperators, compared to the traditional homogenous population assumption.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>When communities face the prisoner's dilemma, swift reaction to adverse ties evolves when competition is fierce between cooperators and defectors, providing an evolutionary basis for the necessity of individuals to adjust their social ties. Our results show how our innate resilience to change relates to mutual agreement between cooperators and how "loyalty" or persistent social ties bring along an evolutionary disadvantage, both from an individual and group perspective.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/287
spellingShingle Nowé Ann
Santos Francisco C
Van Segbroeck Sven
Pacheco Jorge M
Lenaerts Tom
The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
BMC Evolutionary Biology
title The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
title_full The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
title_fullStr The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
title_short The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
title_sort evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/287
work_keys_str_mv AT noweann theevolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT santosfranciscoc theevolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT vansegbroecksven theevolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT pachecojorgem theevolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT lenaertstom theevolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT noweann evolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT santosfranciscoc evolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT vansegbroecksven evolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT pachecojorgem evolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties
AT lenaertstom evolutionofpromptreactiontoadverseties