Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives: The aim of this prospective, multi-centered and multi-arm parallel randomized trial was to test the hypothesis that modified sitting positions including hamstring stretch position (HSP) and squatting position (SP) would reduce needle - bone contact events and increase the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Özgür Özhan, Ceyda Özhan Çaparlar, Mehmet Anıl Süzer, Mehmet Burak Eskin, Bülent Atik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001420302219
_version_ 1811201276260646912
author Mehmet Özgür Özhan
Ceyda Özhan Çaparlar
Mehmet Anıl Süzer
Mehmet Burak Eskin
Bülent Atik
author_facet Mehmet Özgür Özhan
Ceyda Özhan Çaparlar
Mehmet Anıl Süzer
Mehmet Burak Eskin
Bülent Atik
author_sort Mehmet Özgür Özhan
collection DOAJ
description Background and objectives: The aim of this prospective, multi-centered and multi-arm parallel randomized trial was to test the hypothesis that modified sitting positions including hamstring stretch position (HSP) and squatting position (SP) would reduce needle - bone contact events and increase the success rate of combined spinal - epidural anesthesia (CSEA) compared to traditional sitting position (TSP) in patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty. Patients and methods: Three hundred and sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients, aged between 45-85 years were randomly allocated to one of three groups using computer-generated simple randomization: group TSP (n = 120), group HSP (n = 120), and group SP (n = 120). Primary outcome measures were the number of needle-bone contact and success rates. Secondary outcome measure was the ease of interspinous space identification. Results: Seven patients in group SP and four of HSP could not tolerate their position and were excluded. Number of needle-bone contact, success rates, and grade of interspinous space identification were similar between groups (p = 1.000). Independent of positioning, the success rates were higher in patients whose interspinous space was graded as easy compared to difficult or impossible (p < 0.001). Success rates reduced, interspinous space identification became more challenging, and number of needle – bone contact increased as patient’s body mass index (BMI) increased (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SP and HSP may be used as alternatives to the TSP. BMI and ease of interspinous space identification may be considered important determinants for CSEA success.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:19:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7748575a93e431eb1e2886d10a326f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-0014
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:19:22Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-c7748575a93e431eb1e2886d10a326f82022-12-22T03:52:10ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142021-03-01712129136Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trialMehmet Özgür Özhan0Ceyda Özhan Çaparlar1Mehmet Anıl Süzer2Mehmet Burak Eskin3Bülent Atik4Private Çankaya Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, TurkeyUniversity of Medical Sciences Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, TurkeyPrivate Çankaya Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, TurkeyUniversity of Medical Sciences Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, TurkeyBalikesir University Medical Faculty Health Practice and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Balikesir, Turkey; Corresponding author.Background and objectives: The aim of this prospective, multi-centered and multi-arm parallel randomized trial was to test the hypothesis that modified sitting positions including hamstring stretch position (HSP) and squatting position (SP) would reduce needle - bone contact events and increase the success rate of combined spinal - epidural anesthesia (CSEA) compared to traditional sitting position (TSP) in patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty. Patients and methods: Three hundred and sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients, aged between 45-85 years were randomly allocated to one of three groups using computer-generated simple randomization: group TSP (n = 120), group HSP (n = 120), and group SP (n = 120). Primary outcome measures were the number of needle-bone contact and success rates. Secondary outcome measure was the ease of interspinous space identification. Results: Seven patients in group SP and four of HSP could not tolerate their position and were excluded. Number of needle-bone contact, success rates, and grade of interspinous space identification were similar between groups (p = 1.000). Independent of positioning, the success rates were higher in patients whose interspinous space was graded as easy compared to difficult or impossible (p < 0.001). Success rates reduced, interspinous space identification became more challenging, and number of needle – bone contact increased as patient’s body mass index (BMI) increased (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SP and HSP may be used as alternatives to the TSP. BMI and ease of interspinous space identification may be considered important determinants for CSEA success.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001420302219Traditional sitting positionHamstring stretch positionSquatting positionCombined spinal epidural anesthesiaArthroplasty
spellingShingle Mehmet Özgür Özhan
Ceyda Özhan Çaparlar
Mehmet Anıl Süzer
Mehmet Burak Eskin
Bülent Atik
Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Traditional sitting position
Hamstring stretch position
Squatting position
Combined spinal epidural anesthesia
Arthroplasty
title Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal epidural anesthesia a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Traditional sitting position
Hamstring stretch position
Squatting position
Combined spinal epidural anesthesia
Arthroplasty
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001420302219
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetozgurozhan comparisonofthreesittingpositionsforcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ceydaozhancaparlar comparisonofthreesittingpositionsforcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehmetanılsuzer comparisonofthreesittingpositionsforcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehmetburakeskin comparisonofthreesittingpositionsforcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bulentatik comparisonofthreesittingpositionsforcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial