The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce

In this study, we sought to evaluate and compare the effects of constant and dynamic lighting on red and green leaf lettuce (<i>Lactuca sativa</i> L. Red Cos and Lobjoits Green cos) cultivated in a controlled environment. Plants were illuminated with the combination of red 662 and 638 nm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akvilė Viršilė, Jurga Miliauskienė, Perttu Juhani Haimi, Kristina Laužikė, Giedrė Samuolienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1802
_version_ 1797547371140218880
author Akvilė Viršilė
Jurga Miliauskienė
Perttu Juhani Haimi
Kristina Laužikė
Giedrė Samuolienė
author_facet Akvilė Viršilė
Jurga Miliauskienė
Perttu Juhani Haimi
Kristina Laužikė
Giedrė Samuolienė
author_sort Akvilė Viršilė
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we sought to evaluate and compare the effects of constant and dynamic lighting on red and green leaf lettuce (<i>Lactuca sativa</i> L. Red Cos and Lobjoits Green cos) cultivated in a controlled environment. Plants were illuminated with the combination of red 662 and 638 nm, blue 452 nm, and far-red 737 nm at 16 h photoperiod and constant daily light integral (DLI) of each component. Five constant or dynamic lighting treatments were performed: (BR) constant flux of both B452 and R662; (B*R) constant flux of R662, but the DLI of B452 condensed in 8 h in the middle of photoperiod doubling the PPFD of blue light; (BR*) constant flux of B452, but the DLI of R662 light condensed in the middle of photoperiod; (BdynR) constant flux of R662, but the flux of B452 varies in the sinusoidal profile during 16 h photoperiod, imitating diurnal increase and decrease in lighting intensity; and (BRdyn) constant flux of B452, but the flux of R662 varies in sinusoidal profile. The lettuce’s response to dynamic lighting strategies was cultivar specific. Dynamic lighting strategies, mimicking natural lighting fluctuations, did not have a remarkable effect on photosynthesis and antioxidative parameters, but the dynamic flux of blue light component had a pronounced effect on higher macro and microelement contents in lettuce leaves.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:43:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c78160d5621045d6accaf2b8b842b632
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:43:16Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-c78160d5621045d6accaf2b8b842b6322023-11-20T21:37:36ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952020-11-011011180210.3390/agronomy10111802The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf LettuceAkvilė Viršilė0Jurga Miliauskienė1Perttu Juhani Haimi2Kristina Laužikė3Giedrė Samuolienė4Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Horticulture, Kaunas str. 30, 54333 Babtai, LithuaniaLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Horticulture, Kaunas str. 30, 54333 Babtai, LithuaniaLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Horticulture, Kaunas str. 30, 54333 Babtai, LithuaniaLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Horticulture, Kaunas str. 30, 54333 Babtai, LithuaniaLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Horticulture, Kaunas str. 30, 54333 Babtai, LithuaniaIn this study, we sought to evaluate and compare the effects of constant and dynamic lighting on red and green leaf lettuce (<i>Lactuca sativa</i> L. Red Cos and Lobjoits Green cos) cultivated in a controlled environment. Plants were illuminated with the combination of red 662 and 638 nm, blue 452 nm, and far-red 737 nm at 16 h photoperiod and constant daily light integral (DLI) of each component. Five constant or dynamic lighting treatments were performed: (BR) constant flux of both B452 and R662; (B*R) constant flux of R662, but the DLI of B452 condensed in 8 h in the middle of photoperiod doubling the PPFD of blue light; (BR*) constant flux of B452, but the DLI of R662 light condensed in the middle of photoperiod; (BdynR) constant flux of R662, but the flux of B452 varies in the sinusoidal profile during 16 h photoperiod, imitating diurnal increase and decrease in lighting intensity; and (BRdyn) constant flux of B452, but the flux of R662 varies in sinusoidal profile. The lettuce’s response to dynamic lighting strategies was cultivar specific. Dynamic lighting strategies, mimicking natural lighting fluctuations, did not have a remarkable effect on photosynthesis and antioxidative parameters, but the dynamic flux of blue light component had a pronounced effect on higher macro and microelement contents in lettuce leaves.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1802antioxidant powerlight emitting diodesmacroelementsmicroelementssoluble sugars
spellingShingle Akvilė Viršilė
Jurga Miliauskienė
Perttu Juhani Haimi
Kristina Laužikė
Giedrė Samuolienė
The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
Agronomy
antioxidant power
light emitting diodes
macroelements
microelements
soluble sugars
title The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
title_full The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
title_fullStr The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
title_short The Comparison of Constant and Dynamic Red and Blue Light Irradiation Effects on Red and Green Leaf Lettuce
title_sort comparison of constant and dynamic red and blue light irradiation effects on red and green leaf lettuce
topic antioxidant power
light emitting diodes
macroelements
microelements
soluble sugars
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1802
work_keys_str_mv AT akvilevirsile thecomparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT jurgamiliauskiene thecomparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT perttujuhanihaimi thecomparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT kristinalauzike thecomparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT giedresamuoliene thecomparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT akvilevirsile comparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT jurgamiliauskiene comparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT perttujuhanihaimi comparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT kristinalauzike comparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce
AT giedresamuoliene comparisonofconstantanddynamicredandbluelightirradiationeffectsonredandgreenleaflettuce