Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools

<p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate  bones. The experiment produced three serie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erika Moretti, Simona Arrighi, Francesco Boschin, Jacopo Crezzini, Daniele Aureli, Annamaria Ronchitelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Ethnobiology 2015-12-01
Series:Ethnobiology Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349
_version_ 1811211745767718912
author Erika Moretti
Simona Arrighi
Francesco Boschin
Jacopo Crezzini
Daniele Aureli
Annamaria Ronchitelli
author_facet Erika Moretti
Simona Arrighi
Francesco Boschin
Jacopo Crezzini
Daniele Aureli
Annamaria Ronchitelli
author_sort Erika Moretti
collection DOAJ
description <p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate  bones. The experiment produced three series of three engravings on each bone with each of the experimental tools. The first series involved one single stroke; the second, two strokes in the same direction; and the third, multiple strokes using a to-and-fro movement. We analyzed the striations using a Hirox 3D digital microscope (KH-7700) and collected metric and profile data on the morphology of the cut marks. In order to describe the shape of each cross section, we calculated the ratio between the breadth at the top and the breadth at the floor of cut marks. Preliminary results show that both the tool type and the method of creating the cut mark influence the shape of the resulting groove. In our experiment, morphological parameters can be used to differentiate between marks produced using un-retouched flint flakes and those produced using burins. However, neither morphological nor morphometric analysis allows us to identify the mechanical motion used to produce the cuts, nor the state of the bone (fresh, boiled, or dry) at the moment of marking.</p><p lang="en-GB" align="JUSTIFY"> </p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:17:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c78d3264550d4fdfbc690d9e76f41f32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2159-8126
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:17:19Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Society of Ethnobiology
record_format Article
series Ethnobiology Letters
spelling doaj.art-c78d3264550d4fdfbc690d9e76f41f322022-12-22T03:46:35ZengSociety of EthnobiologyEthnobiology Letters2159-81262015-12-016226727510.14237/ebl.6.2.2015.349163Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone ToolsErika Moretti0Simona Arrighi1Francesco Boschin2Jacopo Crezzini3Daniele Aureli4Annamaria Ronchitelli5Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena. Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, UMR 7041 – ArScAn, Equipe AnTET, boite n°32, Maison René Ginouvès (MAE) 21 allée de l'université F-92023 Nanterre Cedex.Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.<p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate  bones. The experiment produced three series of three engravings on each bone with each of the experimental tools. The first series involved one single stroke; the second, two strokes in the same direction; and the third, multiple strokes using a to-and-fro movement. We analyzed the striations using a Hirox 3D digital microscope (KH-7700) and collected metric and profile data on the morphology of the cut marks. In order to describe the shape of each cross section, we calculated the ratio between the breadth at the top and the breadth at the floor of cut marks. Preliminary results show that both the tool type and the method of creating the cut mark influence the shape of the resulting groove. In our experiment, morphological parameters can be used to differentiate between marks produced using un-retouched flint flakes and those produced using burins. However, neither morphological nor morphometric analysis allows us to identify the mechanical motion used to produce the cuts, nor the state of the bone (fresh, boiled, or dry) at the moment of marking.</p><p lang="en-GB" align="JUSTIFY"> </p>http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349TaphonomyDigital microscopy3D imagingCut marksZooarchaeology
spellingShingle Erika Moretti
Simona Arrighi
Francesco Boschin
Jacopo Crezzini
Daniele Aureli
Annamaria Ronchitelli
Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
Ethnobiology Letters
Taphonomy
Digital microscopy
3D imaging
Cut marks
Zooarchaeology
title Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
title_full Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
title_fullStr Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
title_full_unstemmed Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
title_short Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
title_sort using 3d microscopy to analyze experimental cut marks on animal bones produced with different stone tools
topic Taphonomy
Digital microscopy
3D imaging
Cut marks
Zooarchaeology
url http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349
work_keys_str_mv AT erikamoretti using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools
AT simonaarrighi using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools
AT francescoboschin using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools
AT jacopocrezzini using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools
AT danieleaureli using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools
AT annamariaronchitelli using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools