Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
<p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate bones. The experiment produced three serie...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society of Ethnobiology
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Ethnobiology Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349 |
_version_ | 1811211745767718912 |
---|---|
author | Erika Moretti Simona Arrighi Francesco Boschin Jacopo Crezzini Daniele Aureli Annamaria Ronchitelli |
author_facet | Erika Moretti Simona Arrighi Francesco Boschin Jacopo Crezzini Daniele Aureli Annamaria Ronchitelli |
author_sort | Erika Moretti |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate bones. The experiment produced three series of three engravings on each bone with each of the experimental tools. The first series involved one single stroke; the second, two strokes in the same direction; and the third, multiple strokes using a to-and-fro movement. We analyzed the striations using a Hirox 3D digital microscope (KH-7700) and collected metric and profile data on the morphology of the cut marks. In order to describe the shape of each cross section, we calculated the ratio between the breadth at the top and the breadth at the floor of cut marks. Preliminary results show that both the tool type and the method of creating the cut mark influence the shape of the resulting groove. In our experiment, morphological parameters can be used to differentiate between marks produced using un-retouched flint flakes and those produced using burins. However, neither morphological nor morphometric analysis allows us to identify the mechanical motion used to produce the cuts, nor the state of the bone (fresh, boiled, or dry) at the moment of marking.</p><p lang="en-GB" align="JUSTIFY"> </p> |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:17:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c78d3264550d4fdfbc690d9e76f41f32 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2159-8126 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:17:19Z |
publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
publisher | Society of Ethnobiology |
record_format | Article |
series | Ethnobiology Letters |
spelling | doaj.art-c78d3264550d4fdfbc690d9e76f41f322022-12-22T03:46:35ZengSociety of EthnobiologyEthnobiology Letters2159-81262015-12-016226727510.14237/ebl.6.2.2015.349163Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone ToolsErika Moretti0Simona Arrighi1Francesco Boschin2Jacopo Crezzini3Daniele Aureli4Annamaria Ronchitelli5Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.CeSQ, Centro Studi sul Quaternario ONLUS. Via Nuova dell'Ammazzatoio 7, I - 52037 Sansepolcro (Arezzo). Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena. Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, UMR 7041 – ArScAn, Equipe AnTET, boite n°32, Maison René Ginouvès (MAE) 21 allée de l'université F-92023 Nanterre Cedex.Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Unità di Ricerca Preistoria e Antropologia, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena.<p>This study uses a combination of digital microscopic analysis and experimental archaeology to assess stone tool cut marks on animal bones. We used two un-retouched flint flakes and two burins to inflict cut marks on fresh, boiled, and dry ungulate bones. The experiment produced three series of three engravings on each bone with each of the experimental tools. The first series involved one single stroke; the second, two strokes in the same direction; and the third, multiple strokes using a to-and-fro movement. We analyzed the striations using a Hirox 3D digital microscope (KH-7700) and collected metric and profile data on the morphology of the cut marks. In order to describe the shape of each cross section, we calculated the ratio between the breadth at the top and the breadth at the floor of cut marks. Preliminary results show that both the tool type and the method of creating the cut mark influence the shape of the resulting groove. In our experiment, morphological parameters can be used to differentiate between marks produced using un-retouched flint flakes and those produced using burins. However, neither morphological nor morphometric analysis allows us to identify the mechanical motion used to produce the cuts, nor the state of the bone (fresh, boiled, or dry) at the moment of marking.</p><p lang="en-GB" align="JUSTIFY"> </p>http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349TaphonomyDigital microscopy3D imagingCut marksZooarchaeology |
spellingShingle | Erika Moretti Simona Arrighi Francesco Boschin Jacopo Crezzini Daniele Aureli Annamaria Ronchitelli Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools Ethnobiology Letters Taphonomy Digital microscopy 3D imaging Cut marks Zooarchaeology |
title | Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools |
title_full | Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools |
title_fullStr | Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools |
title_short | Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools |
title_sort | using 3d microscopy to analyze experimental cut marks on animal bones produced with different stone tools |
topic | Taphonomy Digital microscopy 3D imaging Cut marks Zooarchaeology |
url | http://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erikamoretti using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools AT simonaarrighi using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools AT francescoboschin using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools AT jacopocrezzini using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools AT danieleaureli using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools AT annamariaronchitelli using3dmicroscopytoanalyzeexperimentalcutmarksonanimalbonesproducedwithdifferentstonetools |