L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français

The project of historical anthropology makes history and archaeology meet within the notion of material culture. However real and fruitful, such an encounter has not truly modified epistemological representations of archaeology or the latter’s relation to history. While archaeology proved most prest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Blaise Dufal
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Centre de Recherches Historiques
Series:L'Atelier du CRH
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/2597
_version_ 1797313541869404160
author Blaise Dufal
author_facet Blaise Dufal
author_sort Blaise Dufal
collection DOAJ
description The project of historical anthropology makes history and archaeology meet within the notion of material culture. However real and fruitful, such an encounter has not truly modified epistemological representations of archaeology or the latter’s relation to history. While archaeology proved most prestigious at the end of the 19th century, the first generation of the Annales tended to leave it aside. Archaeology is still considered as a minor subject, only providing further knowledge without ever shaping interpretation. This is due to the intermediary position held by archaeology, halfway between nature and culture. But today, this hybrid social science of objects takes on the full dimension of interdisciplinary bricolage and may be considered as a model pattern for the concrete practice of historians’ relations to other human and social sciences.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T02:33:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c79ee8e3bb5b4f13af6c47aba134c660
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1760-7914
language fra
last_indexed 2024-03-08T02:33:09Z
publisher Centre de Recherches Historiques
record_format Article
series L'Atelier du CRH
spelling doaj.art-c79ee8e3bb5b4f13af6c47aba134c6602024-02-13T13:59:55ZfraCentre de Recherches HistoriquesL'Atelier du CRH1760-7914610.4000/acrh.2597L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu françaisBlaise DufalThe project of historical anthropology makes history and archaeology meet within the notion of material culture. However real and fruitful, such an encounter has not truly modified epistemological representations of archaeology or the latter’s relation to history. While archaeology proved most prestigious at the end of the 19th century, the first generation of the Annales tended to leave it aside. Archaeology is still considered as a minor subject, only providing further knowledge without ever shaping interpretation. This is due to the intermediary position held by archaeology, halfway between nature and culture. But today, this hybrid social science of objects takes on the full dimension of interdisciplinary bricolage and may be considered as a model pattern for the concrete practice of historians’ relations to other human and social sciences.https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/2597historyarchaeologydisciplinary unconsciousmythologyLatour (Bruno)
spellingShingle Blaise Dufal
L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
L'Atelier du CRH
history
archaeology
disciplinary unconscious
mythology
Latour (Bruno)
title L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
title_full L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
title_fullStr L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
title_full_unstemmed L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
title_short L’archéologie enfermée dehors. Retour sur un malentendu français
title_sort l archeologie enfermee dehors retour sur un malentendu francais
topic history
archaeology
disciplinary unconscious
mythology
Latour (Bruno)
url https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/2597
work_keys_str_mv AT blaisedufal larcheologieenfermeedehorsretoursurunmalentendufrancais