A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case
The issue of fertility preservation in patients with cervical cancer is getting more and more common considering the improved effectiveness of early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. There is a number of evidence-based tactics available to the patients with diagnosed cervical cancer. These tactics...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Remedium Group LLC
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Медицинский совет |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/6068 |
| _version_ | 1797841655910367232 |
|---|---|
| author | I. E. Dmitrieva Y. O. Martirosyan L. G. Dzhanashvili V. O. Dementyeva L. V. Adamyan T. A. Nazarenko |
| author_facet | I. E. Dmitrieva Y. O. Martirosyan L. G. Dzhanashvili V. O. Dementyeva L. V. Adamyan T. A. Nazarenko |
| author_sort | I. E. Dmitrieva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The issue of fertility preservation in patients with cervical cancer is getting more and more common considering the improved effectiveness of early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. There is a number of evidence-based tactics available to the patients with diagnosed cervical cancer. These tactics have been proved effective and include methods such as ovarian transposition; oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Nonetheless, there are no existing medical algorithms to define the priority of actions that should be taken in such cases of restricted time. The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight an existing concern towards the decision-making process regarding fertility preservation in patients with cervical cancer.In this paper we report a clinical case of fertility preservation tactics in a patient undergone ovarian transposition. We pay attention to particular features of the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte retrieval process typical for such patients. The article discusses the subject of COS and oocyte retrieval effectiveness compared to patients who did not undergo ovarian transposition. The 35-year old patient presented 9 month after ovarian transposition to perform oocyte cryopreservation. As a result of COS 3 oocytes were aspirated, compared to 20 oocytes in another patient of comparable age and medical history, but with no ovarian transposition performed.Regarding particular conditions constraining ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval after ovarian transposition, we recommend to consider the possibility of performing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before ovarian transposition in patients with cervical cancer. Prioritizing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in case of having sufficient time before treatment could significantly improve possibilities of achieving genetically related offspring in a long-term perspective. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T16:35:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c7c5ea8a983e4debaf76998838c311b7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-701X 2658-5790 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T16:35:56Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | Remedium Group LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Медицинский совет |
| spelling | doaj.art-c7c5ea8a983e4debaf76998838c311b72023-04-23T06:56:56ZrusRemedium Group LLCМедицинский совет2079-701X2658-57902021-04-0103283210.21518/2079-701X-2021-3-28-325510A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical caseI. E. Dmitrieva0Y. O. Martirosyan1L. G. Dzhanashvili2V. O. Dementyeva3L. V. Adamyan4T. A. Nazarenko5Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and PerinatologyKulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and PerinatologyНациональный медицинский исследовательский центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. КулаковаНациональный медицинский исследовательский центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. КулаковаKulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology; Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryKulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology; Zdanovsky ClinicThe issue of fertility preservation in patients with cervical cancer is getting more and more common considering the improved effectiveness of early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. There is a number of evidence-based tactics available to the patients with diagnosed cervical cancer. These tactics have been proved effective and include methods such as ovarian transposition; oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Nonetheless, there are no existing medical algorithms to define the priority of actions that should be taken in such cases of restricted time. The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight an existing concern towards the decision-making process regarding fertility preservation in patients with cervical cancer.In this paper we report a clinical case of fertility preservation tactics in a patient undergone ovarian transposition. We pay attention to particular features of the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte retrieval process typical for such patients. The article discusses the subject of COS and oocyte retrieval effectiveness compared to patients who did not undergo ovarian transposition. The 35-year old patient presented 9 month after ovarian transposition to perform oocyte cryopreservation. As a result of COS 3 oocytes were aspirated, compared to 20 oocytes in another patient of comparable age and medical history, but with no ovarian transposition performed.Regarding particular conditions constraining ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval after ovarian transposition, we recommend to consider the possibility of performing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before ovarian transposition in patients with cervical cancer. Prioritizing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in case of having sufficient time before treatment could significantly improve possibilities of achieving genetically related offspring in a long-term perspective.https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/6068oncofertilityovarian transpositionfertility preservationcervical cancerradiotherapytransabdominal follicular aspiration |
| spellingShingle | I. E. Dmitrieva Y. O. Martirosyan L. G. Dzhanashvili V. O. Dementyeva L. V. Adamyan T. A. Nazarenko A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case Медицинский совет oncofertility ovarian transposition fertility preservation cervical cancer radiotherapy transabdominal follicular aspiration |
| title | A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case |
| title_full | A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case |
| title_fullStr | A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case |
| title_full_unstemmed | A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case |
| title_short | A challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer - a clinical case |
| title_sort | challenge of fertility preservation in the setting of cervical cancer a clinical case |
| topic | oncofertility ovarian transposition fertility preservation cervical cancer radiotherapy transabdominal follicular aspiration |
| url | https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/6068 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iedmitrieva achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT yomartirosyan achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT lgdzhanashvili achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT vodementyeva achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT lvadamyan achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT tanazarenko achallengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT iedmitrieva challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT yomartirosyan challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT lgdzhanashvili challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT vodementyeva challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT lvadamyan challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase AT tanazarenko challengeoffertilitypreservationinthesettingofcervicalcanceraclinicalcase |