A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database
Despite the increased usage of global soil property maps, a proper review of the maps rarely takes place. This study aims to explore the options for such a review with an application for the S-World global soil property database. Global soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content maps from S-World we...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/544 |
| _version_ | 1797533438938447872 |
|---|---|
| author | Jetse J. Stoorvogel Vera L. Mulder |
| author_facet | Jetse J. Stoorvogel Vera L. Mulder |
| author_sort | Jetse J. Stoorvogel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Despite the increased usage of global soil property maps, a proper review of the maps rarely takes place. This study aims to explore the options for such a review with an application for the S-World global soil property database. Global soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content maps from S-World were studied at two spatial resolutions in three steps. First, a comparative analysis with an ensemble of seven datasets derived from five other global soil databases was done. Second, a validation of S-World was done with independent soil observations from the WoSIS soil profile database. Third, a methodological evaluation of S-world took place by looking at the variation of soil properties per soil type and short distance variability. In the comparative analysis, S-World and the ensemble of other maps show similar spatial patterns. However, the ensemble locally shows large discrepancies (e.g., in boreal regions where typically SOC contents are high and the sampling density is low). Overall, the results show that S-World is not deviating strongly from the model ensemble (91% of the area falls within a 1.5% SOC range in the topsoil). The validation with the WoSIS database showed that S-World was able to capture a large part of the variation (with, e.g., a root mean square difference of 1.7% for SOC in the topsoil and a mean difference of 1.2%). Finally, the methodological evaluation revealed that estimates of the ranges of soil properties for the different soil types can be improved by using the larger WoSIS database. It is concluded that the review through the comparison, validation, and evaluation provides a good overview of the strengths and the weaknesses of S-World. The three approaches to review the database each provide specific insights regarding the quality of the database. Specific evaluation criteria for an application will determine whether S-World is a suitable soil database for use in global environmental studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T11:15:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c7cb59c1b066477698fb602710e22fed |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T11:15:31Z |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj.art-c7cb59c1b066477698fb602710e22fed2023-11-21T20:30:30ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-05-0110554410.3390/land10050544A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property DatabaseJetse J. Stoorvogel0Vera L. Mulder1Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsSoil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsDespite the increased usage of global soil property maps, a proper review of the maps rarely takes place. This study aims to explore the options for such a review with an application for the S-World global soil property database. Global soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content maps from S-World were studied at two spatial resolutions in three steps. First, a comparative analysis with an ensemble of seven datasets derived from five other global soil databases was done. Second, a validation of S-World was done with independent soil observations from the WoSIS soil profile database. Third, a methodological evaluation of S-world took place by looking at the variation of soil properties per soil type and short distance variability. In the comparative analysis, S-World and the ensemble of other maps show similar spatial patterns. However, the ensemble locally shows large discrepancies (e.g., in boreal regions where typically SOC contents are high and the sampling density is low). Overall, the results show that S-World is not deviating strongly from the model ensemble (91% of the area falls within a 1.5% SOC range in the topsoil). The validation with the WoSIS database showed that S-World was able to capture a large part of the variation (with, e.g., a root mean square difference of 1.7% for SOC in the topsoil and a mean difference of 1.2%). Finally, the methodological evaluation revealed that estimates of the ranges of soil properties for the different soil types can be improved by using the larger WoSIS database. It is concluded that the review through the comparison, validation, and evaluation provides a good overview of the strengths and the weaknesses of S-World. The three approaches to review the database each provide specific insights regarding the quality of the database. Specific evaluation criteria for an application will determine whether S-World is a suitable soil database for use in global environmental studies.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/544soil carbonsoil textureglobal soil mapensemble analysis |
| spellingShingle | Jetse J. Stoorvogel Vera L. Mulder A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database Land soil carbon soil texture global soil map ensemble analysis |
| title | A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database |
| title_full | A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database |
| title_fullStr | A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database |
| title_short | A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database |
| title_sort | comparison validation and evaluation of the s world global soil property database |
| topic | soil carbon soil texture global soil map ensemble analysis |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/544 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jetsejstoorvogel acomparisonvalidationandevaluationofthesworldglobalsoilpropertydatabase AT veralmulder acomparisonvalidationandevaluationofthesworldglobalsoilpropertydatabase AT jetsejstoorvogel comparisonvalidationandevaluationofthesworldglobalsoilpropertydatabase AT veralmulder comparisonvalidationandevaluationofthesworldglobalsoilpropertydatabase |