Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients

Abstract Background The treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has rapidly evolved over the past decade, in both transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), resulting in reported improved clinical outcomes. Operator experience and technical improvements have impr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankur Panchal, Andreas Kyvernitakis, Geetha Rayarao, Mark Doyle, Robert W. W. Biederman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-10-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01689-3
_version_ 1818918401835270144
author Ankur Panchal
Andreas Kyvernitakis
Geetha Rayarao
Mark Doyle
Robert W. W. Biederman
author_facet Ankur Panchal
Andreas Kyvernitakis
Geetha Rayarao
Mark Doyle
Robert W. W. Biederman
author_sort Ankur Panchal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has rapidly evolved over the past decade, in both transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), resulting in reported improved clinical outcomes. Operator experience and technical improvements have improved outcomes especially for patients undergoing TAVR. We sought to determine and compare 1-year outcomes using a contemporary meta-analysis. Method We searched the Medline (MESH), Cochrane and Google scholar databases using keywords “AS”, “atrial fibrillation” (AFib) and “stroke”. We performed a meta-analysis to compare TAVR with SAVR populations for post-procedural stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1-year. Results A total of 23 studies met criteria for analysis with total population of 66,857 patients, of which 61,913 had TAVR and 4944 had SAVR. Temporal trends demonstrated overall improvement in outcome for both, TAVR and SAVR groups through the decade. Outcomes, in terms of stroke (3.1% vs. 5%), all-cause (12.4% vs. 10.3%) and cardiovascular mortality (7.2% vs. 6.2%) were similar at 1-year, in TAVR versus SAVR, respectively. Conclusion Despite overall gradual improvement in both TAVR and SAVR outcomes over the decade, there is a statistical overlap in confidence intervals for all-cause, cardiovascular mortality and postprocedural stroke at 1-year. While 23 individual studies demonstrate considerable advantages of each technique in certain cohorts, integrating over 65,000 pts with our stratified surgical analysis suggests that TAVR is comparable to SAVR for low and intermediate risk population while superior to SAVR only in the highest-risk population for short and intermediate term outcomes. This has substantial socio-economic implications as we contemplate expanding our TAVR indications to low/intermediate risk populations.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:49:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7d533550d7d4b31a2f34d1005254658
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:49:23Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-c7d533550d7d4b31a2f34d10052546582022-12-21T19:59:19ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902021-10-0116111110.1186/s13019-021-01689-3Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patientsAnkur Panchal0Andreas Kyvernitakis1Geetha Rayarao2Mark Doyle3Robert W. W. Biederman4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterDepartment of Cardiovascular disease, Allegheny General HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular disease, Allegheny General HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular disease, Allegheny General HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular disease, Allegheny General HospitalAbstract Background The treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has rapidly evolved over the past decade, in both transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), resulting in reported improved clinical outcomes. Operator experience and technical improvements have improved outcomes especially for patients undergoing TAVR. We sought to determine and compare 1-year outcomes using a contemporary meta-analysis. Method We searched the Medline (MESH), Cochrane and Google scholar databases using keywords “AS”, “atrial fibrillation” (AFib) and “stroke”. We performed a meta-analysis to compare TAVR with SAVR populations for post-procedural stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1-year. Results A total of 23 studies met criteria for analysis with total population of 66,857 patients, of which 61,913 had TAVR and 4944 had SAVR. Temporal trends demonstrated overall improvement in outcome for both, TAVR and SAVR groups through the decade. Outcomes, in terms of stroke (3.1% vs. 5%), all-cause (12.4% vs. 10.3%) and cardiovascular mortality (7.2% vs. 6.2%) were similar at 1-year, in TAVR versus SAVR, respectively. Conclusion Despite overall gradual improvement in both TAVR and SAVR outcomes over the decade, there is a statistical overlap in confidence intervals for all-cause, cardiovascular mortality and postprocedural stroke at 1-year. While 23 individual studies demonstrate considerable advantages of each technique in certain cohorts, integrating over 65,000 pts with our stratified surgical analysis suggests that TAVR is comparable to SAVR for low and intermediate risk population while superior to SAVR only in the highest-risk population for short and intermediate term outcomes. This has substantial socio-economic implications as we contemplate expanding our TAVR indications to low/intermediate risk populations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01689-3TAVRSAVRAortic stenosisStrokeAtrial fibrillationMortality
spellingShingle Ankur Panchal
Andreas Kyvernitakis
Geetha Rayarao
Mark Doyle
Robert W. W. Biederman
Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
TAVR
SAVR
Aortic stenosis
Stroke
Atrial fibrillation
Mortality
title Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
title_full Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
title_fullStr Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
title_full_unstemmed Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
title_short Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients
title_sort propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement a meta analysis of over 65 000 patients
topic TAVR
SAVR
Aortic stenosis
Stroke
Atrial fibrillation
Mortality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01689-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ankurpanchal propitioustemporalchangesinclinicaloutcomesaftertranscathetercomparedtosurgicalaorticvalvereplacementametaanalysisofover65000patients
AT andreaskyvernitakis propitioustemporalchangesinclinicaloutcomesaftertranscathetercomparedtosurgicalaorticvalvereplacementametaanalysisofover65000patients
AT geetharayarao propitioustemporalchangesinclinicaloutcomesaftertranscathetercomparedtosurgicalaorticvalvereplacementametaanalysisofover65000patients
AT markdoyle propitioustemporalchangesinclinicaloutcomesaftertranscathetercomparedtosurgicalaorticvalvereplacementametaanalysisofover65000patients
AT robertwwbiederman propitioustemporalchangesinclinicaloutcomesaftertranscathetercomparedtosurgicalaorticvalvereplacementametaanalysisofover65000patients