Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

Long-term Glucocorticoid (GC) use results in compromised bone strength and fractures, and several treatment recommendations have been developed to prevent fractures, but none have been validated in a real-world setting. This study aims to create a treatment decision tool and compares this tool to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia-Feng Chen, Shan-Fu Yu, Wen-Chan Chiu, Chi-Hua Ko, Chung-Yuan Hsu, Han-Ming Lai, Ying-Chou Chen, Yu-Jih Su, Hong-Yo Kang, Tien-Tsai Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/4/452
_version_ 1797298511865184256
author Jia-Feng Chen
Shan-Fu Yu
Wen-Chan Chiu
Chi-Hua Ko
Chung-Yuan Hsu
Han-Ming Lai
Ying-Chou Chen
Yu-Jih Su
Hong-Yo Kang
Tien-Tsai Cheng
author_facet Jia-Feng Chen
Shan-Fu Yu
Wen-Chan Chiu
Chi-Hua Ko
Chung-Yuan Hsu
Han-Ming Lai
Ying-Chou Chen
Yu-Jih Su
Hong-Yo Kang
Tien-Tsai Cheng
author_sort Jia-Feng Chen
collection DOAJ
description Long-term Glucocorticoid (GC) use results in compromised bone strength and fractures, and several treatment recommendations have been developed to prevent fractures, but none have been validated in a real-world setting. This study aims to create a treatment decision tool and compares this tool to the treatment suggestions from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society (IOF-ECTS), and GC-adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (GC-FRAX), above the intervention threshold. We utilized registry data gathered at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, between September 2014 and April 2021. This research is a single-center, observational, and case-controlled study. We recruited participants using prednisone for at least 2.5 mg/day or the equivalent dose for over 3 months, excluding those younger than 40, those with malignancies, or those currently undergoing anti-osteoporosis therapy. The primary endpoint was new fragility fractures within 3 years, including morphometric vertebral fractures detected at baseline and with a follow-up thoracic–lumbar spine X-ray. Participants were randomly allocated into derivation and validation sets. We developed the Steroid-Associated Fracture Evaluation (SAFE) tool in the derivation cohort by assessing the weights of exploratory variables via logistic regression. Prediction performance was compared in the validation set by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity. A total of 424 treatment-naïve subjects were enrolled, and 83 (19.6%) experienced new fractures within 3 years. The final formula of the SAFE tool includes osteoporosis (1 point), an accumulated GC dose ≥ 750 mg within 6 months (or equivalent prednisolone of ≥4.5 mg/day for 6 months) (1 point), a BMI ≥ 23.5 (1 point), previous fractures (1 point), and elderliness of ≥70 years (2 points). In the validation set, a treatment decision based on the SAFE ≥ 2 points demonstrated an AUC of 0.65, with a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 75.9/54.0/58.9, with an ACR of 0.56 (100.0/11.0/31.0), IOF-ECTS 0.61 (75.9/46.0/52.7), and GC-FRAX 0.62 (82.8/42.0/51.2). Among current GIOP recommendations, the SAFE score serves as an appropriate treatment decision tool with increased accuracy and specificity.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:35:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7f0d7449fe74dee9ff3c388e3ccf7ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:35:55Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-c7f0d7449fe74dee9ff3c388e3ccf7ae2024-02-23T15:13:56ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182024-02-0114445210.3390/diagnostics14040452Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced OsteoporosisJia-Feng Chen0Shan-Fu Yu1Wen-Chan Chiu2Chi-Hua Ko3Chung-Yuan Hsu4Han-Ming Lai5Ying-Chou Chen6Yu-Jih Su7Hong-Yo Kang8Tien-Tsai Cheng9Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, TaiwanLong-term Glucocorticoid (GC) use results in compromised bone strength and fractures, and several treatment recommendations have been developed to prevent fractures, but none have been validated in a real-world setting. This study aims to create a treatment decision tool and compares this tool to the treatment suggestions from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society (IOF-ECTS), and GC-adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (GC-FRAX), above the intervention threshold. We utilized registry data gathered at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, between September 2014 and April 2021. This research is a single-center, observational, and case-controlled study. We recruited participants using prednisone for at least 2.5 mg/day or the equivalent dose for over 3 months, excluding those younger than 40, those with malignancies, or those currently undergoing anti-osteoporosis therapy. The primary endpoint was new fragility fractures within 3 years, including morphometric vertebral fractures detected at baseline and with a follow-up thoracic–lumbar spine X-ray. Participants were randomly allocated into derivation and validation sets. We developed the Steroid-Associated Fracture Evaluation (SAFE) tool in the derivation cohort by assessing the weights of exploratory variables via logistic regression. Prediction performance was compared in the validation set by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity. A total of 424 treatment-naïve subjects were enrolled, and 83 (19.6%) experienced new fractures within 3 years. The final formula of the SAFE tool includes osteoporosis (1 point), an accumulated GC dose ≥ 750 mg within 6 months (or equivalent prednisolone of ≥4.5 mg/day for 6 months) (1 point), a BMI ≥ 23.5 (1 point), previous fractures (1 point), and elderliness of ≥70 years (2 points). In the validation set, a treatment decision based on the SAFE ≥ 2 points demonstrated an AUC of 0.65, with a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 75.9/54.0/58.9, with an ACR of 0.56 (100.0/11.0/31.0), IOF-ECTS 0.61 (75.9/46.0/52.7), and GC-FRAX 0.62 (82.8/42.0/51.2). Among current GIOP recommendations, the SAFE score serves as an appropriate treatment decision tool with increased accuracy and specificity.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/4/452corticosteroidsfracture risk assessmentosteoporosisscreeningfracture preventiontreatment
spellingShingle Jia-Feng Chen
Shan-Fu Yu
Wen-Chan Chiu
Chi-Hua Ko
Chung-Yuan Hsu
Han-Ming Lai
Ying-Chou Chen
Yu-Jih Su
Hong-Yo Kang
Tien-Tsai Cheng
Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
Diagnostics
corticosteroids
fracture risk assessment
osteoporosis
screening
fracture prevention
treatment
title Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
title_full Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
title_fullStr Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
title_short Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
title_sort development and comparison of treatment decision tools for glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis
topic corticosteroids
fracture risk assessment
osteoporosis
screening
fracture prevention
treatment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/4/452
work_keys_str_mv AT jiafengchen developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT shanfuyu developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT wenchanchiu developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT chihuako developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT chungyuanhsu developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT hanminglai developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT yingchouchen developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT yujihsu developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT hongyokang developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis
AT tientsaicheng developmentandcomparisonoftreatmentdecisiontoolsforglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosis