Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to clinically evaluate and compare the efficacy and retention of various types of intracanal posts in the restoration of grossly decayed deciduous anterior teeth. The various posts used were polyethylene post, glass post, and composite post. Materials and Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manjul Mehra, Rashu Grover, Inder Kumar Pandit, Nikhil Srivastava, Neeraj Gugnani, Monika Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2016;volume=34;issue=3;spage=199;epage=203;aulast=Mehra
_version_ 1811201088691372032
author Manjul Mehra
Rashu Grover
Inder Kumar Pandit
Nikhil Srivastava
Neeraj Gugnani
Monika Gupta
author_facet Manjul Mehra
Rashu Grover
Inder Kumar Pandit
Nikhil Srivastava
Neeraj Gugnani
Monika Gupta
author_sort Manjul Mehra
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The aim of the present study was to clinically evaluate and compare the efficacy and retention of various types of intracanal posts in the restoration of grossly decayed deciduous anterior teeth. The various posts used were polyethylene post, glass post, and composite post. Materials and Methods: A total number of 16 patients with 45 grossly decayed primary anterior teeth were selected. After biomechanical preparation and obturation, patients were randomly divided on the basis of posts to be used into three groups (Group I: Polyethylene post; Group II: Glass post, and Group III: Composite post). Then, space was created in the obturated canal and posts were placed, followed by core build up. Results: After an interval of 12 months, 86.67% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post restored with polyethylene post (P > 0.005) and 93.3% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post that were restored with glass post (P > 0.005) whereas only 60% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post that were restored with composite post (P< 0.005). Only 20% of the teeth exhibited marginal discoloration in both Groups I and III and 13.33% in Group II and this was nonsignificant. Conclusion: Both glass post and polyethylene post proved to be effective. Glass post showed the maximum retention and marginal adaptation followed by polyethylene post. Thus, it appears to be of potential interest for use especially in clinical pediatric dentistry.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:15:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7f7dc9b75924a4a9b1441c0921d3ef6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-4388
1998-3905
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:15:00Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-c7f7dc9b75924a4a9b1441c0921d3ef62022-12-22T03:52:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052016-01-0134319920310.4103/0970-4388.186749Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical studyManjul MehraRashu GroverInder Kumar PanditNikhil SrivastavaNeeraj GugnaniMonika GuptaPurpose: The aim of the present study was to clinically evaluate and compare the efficacy and retention of various types of intracanal posts in the restoration of grossly decayed deciduous anterior teeth. The various posts used were polyethylene post, glass post, and composite post. Materials and Methods: A total number of 16 patients with 45 grossly decayed primary anterior teeth were selected. After biomechanical preparation and obturation, patients were randomly divided on the basis of posts to be used into three groups (Group I: Polyethylene post; Group II: Glass post, and Group III: Composite post). Then, space was created in the obturated canal and posts were placed, followed by core build up. Results: After an interval of 12 months, 86.67% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post restored with polyethylene post (P > 0.005) and 93.3% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post that were restored with glass post (P > 0.005) whereas only 60% of the teeth exhibited complete retention of the post that were restored with composite post (P< 0.005). Only 20% of the teeth exhibited marginal discoloration in both Groups I and III and 13.33% in Group II and this was nonsignificant. Conclusion: Both glass post and polyethylene post proved to be effective. Glass post showed the maximum retention and marginal adaptation followed by polyethylene post. Thus, it appears to be of potential interest for use especially in clinical pediatric dentistry.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2016;volume=34;issue=3;spage=199;epage=203;aulast=MehraCariesintracanal postsprimary anteriors
spellingShingle Manjul Mehra
Rashu Grover
Inder Kumar Pandit
Nikhil Srivastava
Neeraj Gugnani
Monika Gupta
Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Caries
intracanal posts
primary anteriors
title Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
title_full Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
title_fullStr Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
title_short Management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems: A clinical study
title_sort management of grossly decayed primary anteriors using various intracanal post systems a clinical study
topic Caries
intracanal posts
primary anteriors
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2016;volume=34;issue=3;spage=199;epage=203;aulast=Mehra
work_keys_str_mv AT manjulmehra managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy
AT rashugrover managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy
AT inderkumarpandit managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy
AT nikhilsrivastava managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy
AT neerajgugnani managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy
AT monikagupta managementofgrosslydecayedprimaryanteriorsusingvariousintracanalpostsystemsaclinicalstudy